DarkStar02
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2006
- Messages
- 2,144
No point, it's 7+ months into the future.
The new vizio's are supposed to be out this fall.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No point, it's 7+ months into the future.
Yes, if you read the press release, they will be releasing them with dp1.3, which doesn't exist yet.Why is that? Perhaps they are waiting for some custom or new integrated chips to be available?
Do they have something 40 inch or smaller and designed to be a computer monitor?The new vizio's are supposed to be out this fall.
I talked with people at seiki and they agreed I could be a beta tester, put the display through its paces/review/etc.
Hoping they are not just blowing smoke and come through.
I talked with people at seiki and they agreed I could be a beta tester, put the display through its paces/review/etc.
Hoping they are not just blowing smoke and come through.
I talked with people at seiki and they agreed I could be a beta tester, put the display through its paces/review/etc.
Hoping they are not just blowing smoke and come through.
But first and foremost seiki is budget product. I somewhat doubt for that to be in high priority list, especially if it will require something extra from hardware side or extra manpower when developing firmwares. I'd rather ask Seiki to put gamma tuning not in engineering mode but in normal UI.
40" 4K is 110PPI, which is a match for the 34" 1440p 21:9 an darn close to the 108PPI of a 27" 1440P.
That means you could build one *AWESOME* PLP with a 40" 4K and 2x 27"1440p in portrait.
The Seiki Pro has 4x PiP as well so on paper it may be able to take 4 independent inputs and be treated as a bezel-less 2x2 1080p monitor array. That would be great for controlling multiple servers and still have a fantastic workstation display.
I talked with people at seiki and they agreed I could be a beta tester, put the display through its paces/review/etc.
Hoping they are not just blowing smoke and come through.
I might be wrong, but IIRC amd freesync should come in DP 1.2a. Thus i guess that in DP 1.3 as well. It is optional though, so vendor is not forced to add support for that to claim support for DP 1.3, so i wouldn't bet on all DP 1.3 displays having adaptive-sync.
[X]eltic;1040971265 said:If these monitors come with DisplayPort 1.3, does that mean they come with Adaptive-Sync?
i keep splashing money over my screen and nothign happensi want a custom board for my 39" 4k, or a new HDMI 2.0 TV for sale on amazon!
BTW: do we even have DP 1.3 video cards?
i can dream, but a 40" 21:9 5k version of this with DP1.3 ( capable of 120hz @ full resolution ) would be the ultimate, same height as a 32" monitor but 40" wide for full perhipheral vision.
To each his own. I would delete from considered purchase list right away after noticing 21:9 . Actually .. same with 5K. If you need several most expensive top gpus to drive 4K, put even more load on them?
display tech is finally frogleaping GPUs afetr a decade of lagging behind.4k finally replaced 1600p as high end desk resolution. it took less than 2 years from 30Hz to be replaced by 60Hz g-Sync displays.Now we are having not one, but 2 5k monitors to buy. granted they are still tiled, but as soon as DP 1.3 hits the GPU market we will finally see 5k dispalys for gaming. i would probably hold my upgraditis until we have DP 1.3 VGA and true 5k@60Hz displays without tiling.
Note how fast GPU power will be growing in the near future. Driving 4K or 5K will not be a problem.
100% Correct.
When the 390x hits and the 980Ti is released it should give another 25% power ontop of what we have now so in SLI/Crossfire ( 50% more power) UHD gaming shouldnt be a problem. Many people play older games or lower requirement games, the top 10 most played games on steam could run @ 4k 90/144+ fps with 2 x 980Ti's im sure and those games can benefit from UHD just as much as a new game and look amazing.
So your right, with some tweaking of the game settings right now 4k/5k is possible and by the end of next year when the new cards are out ( 10 series Nvidia , 4xx series AMD ? ) they will be pushing 60fps on a single card no problem @ 4k/5k
120HZ 5k with DP1.3 is definatley something to look out for, even pushing beyond 60 upto 90 is going to be a serious improvement and effectively gives your eyes even more resolution every second than 60fps 4k. So yea 40" 120hz 5k please in VA format with flicker free technology and some HDMi 2.0's ( and curved if the image remains consistently good with no bleed )
There are estimates Titan XXL will be 50%+ comparing to 980. Then dual SLI will solve all 4K problems though not above 60Hz. But chips in 14nm technology coming 2016 will eliminate above the 60Hz too, just at the time 4K above 60Hz might get established. However, the quest never ends: 8K technology is looming, it looks there will always be problems to solve .
You say that but at 8k we are reaching the limit of the human eye for useful purposes. I cant remember where i read it but recently i think there was an article just about this that 8k would be the final resting point of displays for a VERY long time. the fact that you need to be over 60" TV in a living room to notice too much of a difference with 4k oer 1080p speaks volumes, then again a 5" phones pixels are not visible at arms lengh at 720p unless you have amazing eye sight, even then 1080p makes it impossible. somewhere in the middle we have large screens and are still sat close, thats where the monitor comes in and at 4k 28" its pretty hard to see the pixels at a normal seating distance some say even a 32" is a bit too high ppi...
8k = 32million pixels ( as im sure you know ! ) so at that point your going to need a 120" + screen or even 160" or more !? to tell from standard room distances (not even cinema distances ) and as for a monitor .... lets just say 16k would litterally be going past what the human eye could discern from the varying formats of TV,Projector,Monitor size to distance ratio.but yea, VR might benefit with 4k per eye but 8k is going to be the sensible limit for decades to come id imagine
All this chit chat is nice and all, but what we really need is some news on concrete release dates (and pricing, but that's just being demanding)
The arguments about what the eye can and can not see is for viewing television content. High contrast content such as text is much more noticeable. Also for using a TV as a monitor once tends to sit much closer.
Just three 4K monitors is 12K pixels which is even much higher than 8K.