Makeroflostsouls
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2008
- Messages
- 2,821
No it does not do 120hz over the HDMI, It's limited to 60hz.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CRT draws very differently. Personally I prefer 85hz, and better yet 96hz - 100hz on a fw900 crt. Due to the way a crt redraws, crt's exhibit no blur/smear on fast motion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refresh_rate
In the case of modern, low response time + overdrive 120hz*input* LCD computer monitors - the response time compensation ~ overdrive combined with the screen update rate to the pixels (not the fps) comes into play from what I understand. According to this article, at 8.3ms per screen update (120 screen updates/second ~ 120hz) on high/very high overdrive, the pixels "relax" much faster than at longer screen updates of 60hz at 16.6 ~ 16.7 ms each. These updates are sent regardless of your frame rate, resulting in some duplication at lower frame rates, but the overdrive at 8.3ms per screen update should still reduce the smearing.
.
If this review is correct, it might give some insight. It also has some nice diagrams and further details on the page linked beyond what I pasted below, and on the 60hz testing on the page that comes before it.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/monitors/display/samsung-sm2233rz_10.html#sect0
What about 120Hz then? Subjectively, RTC artifacts disappeared when I changed the refresh rate, but why?
The response time does not change much. The average is 3.3 milliseconds (GtG), which is only 0.1 less than at 60Hz. This difference may be just due to measurement inaccuracies.
The RTC error in percent is somewhat lower: an average of 7.3% and a maximum of 40%. This is better than at 60Hz (9.6% average) but not much different.
The RTC error relaxation time is the answer. The diagram is made to the same scale as for the 60Hz refresh rate so that you could easily see the difference. The average relaxation time was 15.2 milliseconds but now is only 6.6 milliseconds. It means that the RTC errors are not just lower but also vanish from the screen faster!
I want to illustrate this with a series of pictures showing the movement of a black square along a gray background at 60Hz and 120Hz refresh rates. The square is moving from left to right and its movement is captured each 8.3 milliseconds – the picture update period at a refresh rate of 120Hz.
The gain of nearing 120fps+ average or going higher (to maintain the fps vs scene complexity dips) in reaction based gaming would be that you would be see more "recent" or "current" action every 8.3ms - always providing a new unique frame per screen update of 120hz, as opposed to every 16.6ms. Some games tear worse than others though and some people are proponents of keeping their frame rate below the refresh rate of the monitor in an attempt to avoid tearing.
Can someone help me here?
I have a gtx580 and I want this monitor but I dont have a display port. How can I get this monitor to run at 120hz without a display port? What kind of adapter would I need?
Would it just be smarter overall to buy a asus vg278 instead of this?
S27A750D
Just thrown a rig together to mount this puppy, a great monitor, allows you to sit back, outstanding gaming performance, loving this, no bleed, no dead pixels, solid colors through the whole gamut, bright but crisp with it. Highly recomended.
Agree. I feel like I struck gold when I picked up the 750D at Tigerdirect for $399... now they are discontinued and price is sky high. I continue to be amazed by the gaming experience this baby provides, BF3 on ultra at 100+ fps is just amazing on this thing!
Any opinions on chancing one of the factory refurbs available on Ebay?
$530 seems like a decent deal and in my experience refurbs seem to have less assembly-related QC issues because they are almost always checked individually and by hand. The 750D looks better than the 950, costs less, and the standard frame mounting makes it less prone to that BLB caused by pinching on the asymmetric 950 mount.
Link to refurb
so i ordered one of these yesterday i no pcmonitors.org used to have a review and calibration settings for this which is no longer there anyone got any recommendations would appreciate it
§·H·ï·Z·N·ï·L·T·ï;1038017207 said:This Samsung performs on the same level as my 21" Sony CRT's.
I notice no input/respone time lag at all on this screen, it's very smooth.
It has the CRT feel I was going for which I never thought I would find in a flat panel.
My PC room with the lights off goes completly black so glare is not an issue for me, but I could see it being an issues for others in a room with windows.
Just make sure you have the room dark behind you and you will be fine.
Here's some pics...
I love mine but sicne I went from 2x6970 in CFX to a GTX 690 I have had the display out of range or not optimal message pop on me quite often
I'm curious to know if anyone has seen the Asus VG278H compared to this monitor (in person with some good testing time in)
This display has 120 Hz on Nvidia Cards? Or 120 hz only for amd cards? Also some people write that this display has fan inside. Its true? How often this message pop up? Every hour? Every few mins? What about pixel size?
S27A750D has ghosting? What display is better and fasrer: XL2420T or this?
Where lower input lag? S27A750D works with latest NVIDIA drivers? 306.23
Sorry to hear that.Well as the post starter I thought I'd give a follow-up. My 750D has been getting worse and worse with the DisplayPort issues and I've finally had it. I've contacted Samsung and have been escalated to their care department, demanding a replacement 950D to be shipped. Honestly this is the very first time I've been disappointed with a Samsung product, however it seems like so far their support is following through with this since I am still under warranty. What a bummer too...the 750D was a beautiful monitor other than the DP outages.