- Joined
- Apr 10, 2005
- Messages
- 17,200
you would need some serious pressure to get the coolant through all those tiny jets... it would kill my system. lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you might be right, you might be suprised.revenant said:you would need some serious pressure to get the coolant through all those tiny jets... it would kill my system. lol.
Actually I lost nothing on my overclock by running a Storm off a Aquastream with 6mm tubing. Temps were not as good but who cares if the overclock remains the same and you are withing 1-2c?revenant said:you would need some serious pressure to get the coolant through all those tiny jets... it would kill my system. lol.
WarlordBB said:I love all you AC peeps (TN, RC you know I do) but I'm gonna have to side with BillA and Cathar on this one (even though no one asked my opinion).
The amount of contributions, knowledge, experience, testing, analysis, help and overall furthering of the WC cause represented by these two individuals combined is astounding. I for one think that they have a right to say, essentially, "bring some evidence to the table or STFU".
I have nothing against theseeker but, frankly, he doesn't deserve for me (or anyone else) to believe him unless he's willing to give at least a tiny bit of proof.
Now I also realize he may not care if I believe him or not but that's not the point I'm arguing.
If I put one of my projects into Open Source and someone who I knew had little to no direct experience with my particular area of programming made a post that essentially amounted to, "I took your code and made it better", AND they didn't offer any evidence to support the claim, I'd be pretty ticked and I'd also be inclined to not believe them.
And I have no where near the level of expertise in my own field as these guys do in theirs. Although I do consider myself very accomplish I don't fool myself thinking I'm the best of the best, and these guys are. And that ain't !!!!!! talk, that's just plain ole fact.
2 C is absolutely huge, if it's verifiable gain. it's fucking epic when you are talking about a high end block like the G4, let alone the G5.theseeker said:Sorry for not replying sooner, I have been out of town.
Frankly I do not care if you believe me or not. I once remapped a chip in Porsche with the help of one my control engineers and I had many doubters until I twisted one of the axles due to, too much torque. I said it before and I will say it again. The difference was only 2 degrees! I dont think that type of gain requires an investigation or a full blown test by Toms Hardware. I simply did this for fun and because I have the resources at my finger tips. Additionally, the new block is in my new house, therfore no testing was conducted back to back in a controlled environment.
Lastly, if you look at my past post's you will notice that I have nothing but the utmost respect for Cathar.
BillA said:if its an e-penis thing thats cool for him
he claims to have bested the Storm, I asked for numbers
to date there is no photo (remember, 'other' changes too), nor any numbers
"Why is it that everyone is a liar or a cheat to you?"
TN, how do you distinguish between true and false ?
I am 60 years old and do not believe in Santa Claus or god.
I did a parametric analysis of the Storm and improved it, prior to receiving Stew's suggestions. Interestingly my changes and Stew's were very similar. So I certainly agree that this wb could be improved as I have done so. BigBucks claims to have spent money using a metal that cannot work to best a product the design of which he is manifestly ignorant. The guy is a liar and you all are gullible.
A snake oil salesman; you all believe that with lots of $$$ anything is possible. BigBucks convinced you that he had $$$, then claimed to have spent some $ (??) using unknown engn skills with a piss poor metal.
TN
why do you believe claims w/o any evidence whatsoever ?
DFI Daishi said:2 C is absolutely huge, if it's verifiable gain. it's fucking epic when you are talking about a high end block like the G4, let alone the G5.
i don't take this claim too seriously unless you get that bad boy on some kind of calibrated test equipment, but i don't think that you realize just how large an accomplishment you claim to have made.
the reason for all the disbelief is that what you are claiming would be a quantum leap forward, regardless of the expense, and your reported gains are totally inexplicable.
at the moment, i'll give you the benifit of the doubt and chalk up the gains to either un calibrated equipment or that you've just happend to find the golden city with this block.
i just hope that you realize that 2C improvement is amazing.....the spread between the best on the market and the worst is only around 4C.
I think you need help Bill......BillA said:you would be well advised to learn something about the subject
full, and I mean REALLY FULL, of shit
you, the seeker
liar, you bet; thats you
employees ? another lie I bet
company name please
I'm in Shoreacres TX and I use NUMBERS to describe performance
old stuff http://www.thermal-management-testing.com/
EDIT
I have been been shot at, held with a gun to my head, and killed
god is your fiction
So the 2c drop in temp could have been a better mount, different room temps, etc.Cathar said:In physics terms, given a 14x14mm heat source size, the resultant effect of the lower thermal conductivity of inconel over silver mean that even if the convectional transfer co-efficient of the water-metal interface, in the same sort of design, were raised to infinity, then at best the inconel based wb could only ever exceed the silver based version by around 0.5C on a 100W heat load across that 14x14mm heat load area.
Infinity is a big number though. Even if we presume that the new block achieved a convectional transfer co-efficient 10x that of the Storm/G5, keeping in mind that the scale between something like a Maze 3 and a G5 is just ~3x in terms of the convectional rate, then the G5 would still be performing better due to inconel's lower thermal conductivity.
No, I think what he is saying is it HAS to be. It is an impossibility for the iconel block to perform better than the G5R1ckCa1n said:So the 2c drop in temp could have been a better mount, different room temps, etc.
BillA said:you would be well advised to learn something about the subject
full, and I mean REALLY FULL, of shit
you, the seeker
liar, you bet; thats you
employees ? another lie I bet
company name please
I'm in Shoreacres TX and I use NUMBERS to describe performance
old stuff http://www.thermal-management-testing.com/
EDIT
I have been been shot at, held with a gun to my head, and killed
god is your fiction
lol, why I'm a gear head; burned out on peopleR1ckCa1n said:I think you need help Bill......
Ice Czar said:yes
http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=12194&
youd be buying a peice of history
and here are pics of the G7
http://www.employees.org/~slf/g7/
BillA said:I would not have expected that cup/wall ratio
Susquehannock said:Silver is nice but the extra cost far outweighs the slight advantage it provides over Copper.
copper oxidizes over time when exposed to air. common copper oxide is green to green-blue. it's not actually the oxide that is green, but i can't remember if it's the hydroxide or hydrate that gives it that colour.........Happy Hopping said:but I notice from someone pic that there is a color change thru out the year on the G4 due to the fact that it's copper. The color seems to change to green.
DFI Daishi said:c.
silver oxidixes more or less black......blue-black, blue-grey in around there.......
Happy Hopping said:Okay, in jewelery stores that sells silver, those silver jewelery remains as silver color forever. So how can they oxidizes?
Anyhow, is there any chance that when the G7 is fully available directly from Cathar, that the G5 will be release to Swiftech to replace the current G4?
zer0signal667 said:Regarding corrosion... galvanic corrosion can only occur if there is a path for current to flow. It flows one way through the water, and presumably through the computer case to complete the circuit. Isolate the parts from the case and you break your circuit, thereby (in theory) preventing galvanic corrosion.
Also, aluminum is notorious for corroding in such systems because it has a penchant for pitting.
Happy Hopping said:we spent the last 5 pages in this thread talk about corrosion. But even if there are radiator made of Al, they are all anodized in anyway. So why the big concern?
Anyhoo, in the odd chance that it does happen:
1) When will we see corrosion from the time you bought the system? It's been 1.5 decades since I took organic chem., so I don't remember the formula
2) Let's say it happen: what will be the physical damage to the computer, specificially which components?
take a look at an old silver spoon that never gets used and seldom gets polished for an example of what i mean. the oxide coating rubs off pretty easily, polishing you block, spoon, jewlery or whatever else, but if you just leave it sitting there, it gets an ugly black coating of oxide on it.Happy Hopping said:Okay, in jewelery stores that sells silver, those silver jewelery remains as silver color forever. So how can they oxidizes?
Happy Hopping said:Okay, in jewelery stores that sells silver, those silver jewelery remains as silver color forever. So how can they oxidizes?
>>>>>
It's a little more complicated than that actually. You see, a large majority of the SilverDFI Daishi said:take a look at an old silver spoon that never gets used and seldom gets polished for an example of what i mean. the oxide coating rubs off pretty easily, polishing you block, spoon, jewlery or whatever else, but if you just leave it sitting there, it gets an ugly black coating of oxide on it.
>>>>
There ya go.nikhsub1 said:Corrosion can happen very quickly. Just don't use al with copper or silver, period.
![]()
nikhsub1 said:Corrosion can happen very quickly. Just don't use al with copper or silver, period.
![]()
Ice Czar said:yes
http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=12194&
youd be buying a peice of history
and here are pics of the G7
http://www.employees.org/~slf/g7/
Pump output 600 l/h 132 lmp. gal./h. 158 U.S. gal./h.
Delivery head 1,50 m/wat.col. 4 ft. 11 in./wat.col.
Power consumption 10 W
Hose connection (suction side) Ø13mm (1/2")
Hose connection (pressure side) Ø13mm (1/2")
Dimensions: lenght x width x height 147 x 75 x 118 5.8 x 3 x 4.7 in.
This is for the G5 but since the G7 is a variation on the G5 I'm sure it applies.Q: What tubing size support is available?
A: The following options are available:
* By default the block is fitted with nickel plated barbs suitable for 1/2" inner diameter tubing.
* Optionally the default barbs may be substituted with nickel plated barbs suitable for 3/8" inner diameter tubing upon request.
* Barbs suitable for 5/16" (8mm) inner diameter tubing are also available on request, but these will not be nickel plated.
* The block may be requested without barbs fitted (for a small discount). the block has 3/8" BSPP threaded ports for attaching barbs of one's choice.
have you actually heard the DDC in opperation? i honestly haven't but the thing is rated for 22 db opperation: damn quiet if you ask me.Happy Hopping said:Thanks for the info about the ID thing. As to DangerDen, I just can't stand their high pitch noise
DFI Daishi said:have you actually heard the DDC in opperation? i honestly haven't but the thing is rated for 22 db opperation: damn quiet if you ask me.
unless you have heard it first hand and KNOW that it is too loud for you, i would really suggest looking into it, especially since in many situations even your HDDs will make more noise than that pump will.
the same pump is sold by swiftech as the MCP 350, in case you didn't already know.