- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Messages
- 1,329
have you seen the 320mb 8800GTS prices lately?
Since 1-3 months ago, they've actually GONE UP.
You cannot, now, buy one (unless you get a ridiculous MIR rebate deal, but even then) for under ~$300. In fact, Newegg scarcely has one in stock for under $280. I remember seeing them all over the place for $250-260 some months ago.
Then let's look at the 8600GT and 8600GTS. Performance on these cards, unless overclocked, is roughly that of 7600gt-7900gt or less. the 7950gt 256mb, in fact, even beats out the 8600gts in many tests! The price of the 8600gts is about 2/3 that of the 8800gts 320mb, so why not just spend the extra $100-125? Don't you see something wrong with that? The 8600GTS is a $130 card, the 8600GT is a $100 card, 'nuff said.
So what's the problem? NVIDIA makes good cards!
they do, but...
In considering your next video card purchase - you may want to take a closer look at ATI's offerings. I personally am going to try to hold out for a mid-end ATI HD 2600XT card so that I don't have to purchase a NVIDIA card. The reasoning behind this is because of the price increase of the 8800GTS 320MB cards and relatively abysmal 8600gt(s) performance. If you want more of this kind of crap, keep buying NVIDIA and shutting ATI out of your mind for being late to the party. (bear in mind that I'm running a 6800GT 256MB right now)
I will agree that the HD2900XT launch was mostly a flop. However, the card does show a LITTLE promise (overclocking, newer FSAA modes etc etc).
I'm no ATI zealot, but I do hate anything that even remotely looks monopolistic (see Intel circa Pentium 2 era). NVIDIA is starting to stink of monopolistic practices, so I urge you all to atleast LOOK at ATI's offerings!
Since 1-3 months ago, they've actually GONE UP.
You cannot, now, buy one (unless you get a ridiculous MIR rebate deal, but even then) for under ~$300. In fact, Newegg scarcely has one in stock for under $280. I remember seeing them all over the place for $250-260 some months ago.
Then let's look at the 8600GT and 8600GTS. Performance on these cards, unless overclocked, is roughly that of 7600gt-7900gt or less. the 7950gt 256mb, in fact, even beats out the 8600gts in many tests! The price of the 8600gts is about 2/3 that of the 8800gts 320mb, so why not just spend the extra $100-125? Don't you see something wrong with that? The 8600GTS is a $130 card, the 8600GT is a $100 card, 'nuff said.
So what's the problem? NVIDIA makes good cards!
they do, but...
In considering your next video card purchase - you may want to take a closer look at ATI's offerings. I personally am going to try to hold out for a mid-end ATI HD 2600XT card so that I don't have to purchase a NVIDIA card. The reasoning behind this is because of the price increase of the 8800GTS 320MB cards and relatively abysmal 8600gt(s) performance. If you want more of this kind of crap, keep buying NVIDIA and shutting ATI out of your mind for being late to the party. (bear in mind that I'm running a 6800GT 256MB right now)
I will agree that the HD2900XT launch was mostly a flop. However, the card does show a LITTLE promise (overclocking, newer FSAA modes etc etc).
I'm no ATI zealot, but I do hate anything that even remotely looks monopolistic (see Intel circa Pentium 2 era). NVIDIA is starting to stink of monopolistic practices, so I urge you all to atleast LOOK at ATI's offerings!