Mozilla: Google Has Made YouTube Slower on Edge and Firefox

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Jul 25, 2018.

  1. Megalith

    Megalith 24-bit/48kHz Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,004
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Google’s new design for YouTube reportedly loads up to five times slower on Edge and Firefox than on Chrome. Being that a deprecated API is involved, many believe the company is intentionally stifling its competitors. Firefox and Edge users may revert to the original design by installing certain extensions.

    In a thread on Twitter, Mozilla's Technical Program Manager has stated that YouTube's Polymer redesign relies heavily on the deprecated Shadow DOM v0 API, which is only available in Chrome. This in turn makes the site around five times slower on competing browsers such as Microsoft Edge and Mozila Firefox.
     
  2. macksomerville

    macksomerville [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,970
    Joined:
    May 18, 2000
    When will these morons in Corporations learn...
     
  3. Tiberian

    Tiberian DILLIGAFuck

    Messages:
    5,725
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2012
    I saw this earlier, thought "OK, I'll test it..." and I use Firefox ESR 52.9.0. I have a great number of addons/extensions already because of course Firefox allows/allowed for that level, and I stick with the older ESR 52 release 'cause most all of the addons/extensions I use no longer function on the newer versions after v57, no thanks to Mozilla. So I loaded the YouTube Classic addon, loaded the YouTube main page, voila, way waaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyy faster. It doesn't double load the page like it did prior to adding that extension, so I disabled the extension, restarted the browser, and did the same main page load - double loaded, slower, less efficient.

    Upon enabling that addon once more I decided to load a video in a new tab and voila, it loaded damned faster, way waaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyy faster than normal.

    So yeah, Google, about that shadow API thing, what the fuck are you people doing? o_O:cautious::rolleyes:
     
    MrTryfe, ktos2, blkt and 1 other person like this.
  4. theplaidfad

    theplaidfad Lurker

    Messages:
    1,046
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    When money doesn't exist... in other words, never.
     
    Wierdo and heatlesssun like this.
  5. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,443
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Just use the brave browser and get no ads at all. Much faster loads.
     
    Maxx, risc and arr4ws like this.
  6. GlowingGhoul

    GlowingGhoul Whines about Whiners

    Messages:
    445
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2013
    I thought Google only wants the best for us, that's why they 'curate' information and tell us what's credible and what's "fake news". I find all these suggestion of Google acting in an underhanded, unethical manner to be highly suspect. <sarc off>
     
  7. Ultima99

    Ultima99 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,888
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    What's wrong Google? Can't win on your own strengths anymore?
     
    ktos2, Maxx, HoffY and 6 others like this.
  8. The Mad Atheist

    The Mad Atheist Gawd

    Messages:
    915
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Stopped updating FF when DownThemAll was no longer supported, I also use Palemoon.
     
    jahsoul and Armenius like this.
  9. mynamehere

    mynamehere [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,764
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Becoming an all encompassing Googlopoly.
    Creating the Alphabet Matrix
    We are the Google, You will be Alphabetized. Resistance is futile.
    They're trying to bring forth the Googleverse.
    They're taking over all that is popular, and making it function far better, or only on their wares so that we abandon all others so they can usher in an all powerful Googleocracy.
     
  10. Derfman

    Derfman [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,216
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Made the switch to Firefox for the first time in years a little while back. Google Chrome is yesterdays news.
     
    d8lock, MrTryfe, ktos2 and 3 others like this.
  11. katanaD

    katanaD [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,987
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2016
    wait... are you telling me that a company.. might make its own products work better together then when using a competitors product??



    someone quick.. get me my fainting couch


    :rolleyes:
     
    Trixar and cyclone3d like this.
  12. Tiberian

    Tiberian DILLIGAFuck

    Messages:
    5,725
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2012
    There's nothing wrong with that, but when such a company actively does something that intentionally causes competing products to suffer performance loss or hamper it in any respects for those competitors to make use of, that's when it crosses over into anti-competitive practices and it becomes a serious issue which is potentially what's happening here.
     
    MrTryfe, ktos2, HoffY and 7 others like this.
  13. BSmith

    BSmith [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,324
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Simple solution. Just stop using Youtube. Ta-da!
     
    clockdogg likes this.
  14. cyclone3d

    cyclone3d [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,980
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    You mean like nVidia and Gameworks?
     
    Vercinaigh and Wierdo like this.
  15. polonyc2

    polonyc2 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    16,371
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    how do I delete the userscript if I want to later on?
     
  16. sfsuphysics

    sfsuphysics I don't get it

    Messages:
    13,684
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    I dont care about firefox vs chrome, does it load 5 times slower than it used to? Or is chrome just 5 times faster now? That is a major distinction.
     
    SticKx911 likes this.
  17. Jagger100

    Jagger100 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,451
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    You mean where's the government and enforcing anti-trust? Google either spin off the browser or YouTube.
     
  18. next-Jin

    next-Jin [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,146
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Excellent point.

    Frankly it’s fair game as far as I’m concerned, be better IE/FF.
     
  19. jtm55

    jtm55 Gawd

    Messages:
    530
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Hi All

    As I don't use Chrome I'm glad I don't use YouTube either.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2018
  20. ZeqOBpf6

    ZeqOBpf6 Gawd

    Messages:
    592
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    You know who would be most disappointed by this? 2008 Google.
     
  21. Azrak

    Azrak Gawd

    Messages:
    774
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2015
    Make the competition look slow and.... profit.

    Now where have I seen this before...... hmmm.
     
    Vercinaigh likes this.
  22. blkt

    blkt Gawd

    Messages:
    666
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    This. I'm so glad ESR exists, along with Waterfox (yes it supports most classic addons/extensions) and the Pale Moon / Basilisk projects.
     
  23. Exavior

    Exavior [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,652
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2005
    I am sorry, what is the issue here?

    I use edge as my browser. I just brought up youtube. First time the main page took about 1 - 2 seconds to load. Every video I clicked on loaded instantly. Went back to home page and it loaded instantly. So I don't see any issues here with loading.

    That said it could be my connection. I work in the office of an ISP. So I have a 1Gbps right into our core router before I reach our peer site 1 hop away where we have a direct peer agreement Google. But it sounded like the issue wasn't due to transmit but was how the browser had to struggle trying to render the page.
     
  24. tetris42

    tetris42 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,518
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Didn't Microsoft do that to Wordperfect also?
     
  25. cyberguyz

    cyberguyz Gawd

    Messages:
    694
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Well Google. Was a $5B fine not enough?
     
  26. lcpiper

    lcpiper [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,492
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008

    Sounds to me that it's YouTube's decision that has brought this about and not Google's. Now maybe Google had a hand in convincing Youtube that this was good for them, but there could be truth in that as well.

    Ahh yes, I get it, both Google and Youtube are subsidiaries of Alphabet
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2018
  27. Tiberian

    Tiberian DILLIGAFuck

    Messages:
    5,725
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2012
    I know I'll regret saying this but, you do realize of course that Google owns YouTube so, in effect, it could just be called GooTube for all anyone would really care. Even in spite of Google supposedly letting YouTube operate in a separate entity sense of things, I'm pretty sure things are still rather tightly controlled considering the importance of YouTube to Google in this day and age.
     
    Vercinaigh likes this.
  28. Hitti2

    Hitti2 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    335
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Whats funny is that i cannot play html5 on android chrome beta.
     
  29. lcpiper

    lcpiper [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,492
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008

    I just corrected my previous post but no, at the time I didn't realize that Alphabet owned both Google and Youtube.
     
  30. janis2018

    janis2018 n00b

    Messages:
    43
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2018
    Chrome is slower on some procesors and edge, firefock is fastest. internet shuts dow on firefock some times. true youtobe is now slower.
     
  31. TorxT3D

    TorxT3D Gawd

    Messages:
    651
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Time for a youtube replacement, asap
     
  32. Chupachup

    Chupachup Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    435
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2014
    It appears as though they are! It seems the Firefux and Edge development teams decided to zig and both Chrome and Youtube development teams decided to zag! There is no law stating browser developers must always tack in unison and there are remedies for the non-Chrome browsers- it's not as if YouTube is shutting them out.

    Why shouldn't one Alphabet property be built to function better with another Alphabet property? Why should Alphabet's property development be dictated by two other browsers/companies who, together, do not make up a majority of the usage?

    All I hear is a lot of, "Mommy?! They won't play their game MY way!" and "They made a car that's faster than ours on THEIR track!"

    If Mozilla and Microsoft don't like it, they have a few options-
    1. Keep their product the same and continue on their own path. Hoping that YouTube sees a falloff in views that would cause them to change.
    2. Change their product to be more compatible with other services on the web.
    3. Make it easier for their user base to decide if they wish to install extensions to be compatible with various online services as they are being accessed.

    If you don't like it, you have several options as well-
    1. Stay with what you have.
    2. Install applicable extensions for your browser or switch to Chrome to speed up YouTube.
    3. Move on to another video venue.
    #Freedom

    EDIT: I wanted to note, this is almost part and parcel the same thing I said back in the days when IE was the dominant browser and it was the likes of Mozilla and Google having a similar whine and cheese fest. It's called competition for a reason. Innovate, adapt or die!
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2018
    lcpiper likes this.
  33. lcpiper

    lcpiper [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,492
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Chupachup is right from where I sit.
     
  34. ZeqOBpf6

    ZeqOBpf6 Gawd

    Messages:
    592
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    I was unable to replicate this until tinkering around with Firefox.

    If your YouTube experience is the same on Chrome and Firefox and you would like to try out the new and deliberately hampered version on Firefox

    Open NoScript
    Temporarily Allow GoogleTagManager.com

    To reverse, mark GoogleTagManager.com as untrusted again.


    Big difference between making your site run faster on your browser and making your site run slower on someone else's browser.
     
  35. mtrupi

    mtrupi Gawd

    Messages:
    727
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2007
    This is timely. I was just wondering if I was just imagining a difference.
     
  36. Exavior

    Exavior [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,652
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2005
    But that isn't supposed to be the cause. It is supposed to be that Google is still supporting some standard that everyone else dropped some time ago and as a result of them deciding to use this old standard throughout YouTube any browser that is more up to date on following HTML5 standards should be having a few seconds of trouble trying to convert old legacy code into the new standard. Will agree about what the difference between making it better on your platform, vs making it worse on others. That is a big difference. And in this case Google made an API that only works with Chrome and then coded YouTube to work with that meaning that they are trying to make YouTube be a chrome only site.
     
  37. KG-Prime90

    KG-Prime90 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    251
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2013
    Hmn, i'm on firefox esr, no problems with youtube being slow, it loads instantly as always, new youtube tabs load instantly. I have 100 tabs or more open 24/7 in my browser, currently have 16 youtube tabs open.