triviumnate
Gawd
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2005
- Messages
- 852
the demo is amazing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get some friends and pickup the 4 pack. comes out to like 34.50$ or something per game.
SSSSHHHHHHH don't tell people you can pay anything other than 50 bucks. We want to weed the dumb ones out.
L4D was an awesome game. However...
I'm having a hard time bringing myself to play L4D2. I think I've logged 20 minutes into the demo...if that. I don't know what it is- I'm not tired of L4D, and this is a new game. I think it is the community...the games I've played blew, and so did the players. I'm tired of idiots running around not knowing what the fuck they are doing, etc. etc. That is going to make me hate the game. As said by me before, if the game community is going to be like the original L4D when it first released, I'd be all over it...but lately, the L4D community sucks ass. I'm hoping the true players only get L4D2, but we'll see. Also, I got tons of lag, which was another huge reason.
In my opinion, this kind of elitist attitude is what ruins game communities. I've found both L4D and Demigod players to have this kind of attitude, and it is what causes new players to the game to leave it. What is a 'true' player? I would argue that there is no such thing, as each person has their own opinion on how they want to play the game.
A true player isn't someone who hasn't even bothered to complete the single player campaigns, doesn't quit as soon as they start losing, and doesn't scream at people when they dont accept their "leadership"
Hate to burst your bubble , but its the Internet. If you can't handle social situations then maybe you should play console games by yourself. There are going to be people that act in ways you may not like. Deal with it. I will agree with you that some people who connect to a game are absolutely annoying and probably pride themselves in being so, But you shouldn't let those people ruin the game for you. Just find a different server or tune them out. Remember if you don't pay any attention to them, they will go away.
I just dont play multiplayer games anymore, period. Because 95% of my online experiences have been nothing more than exercises in frustration.
I just dont play multiplayer games anymore, period. Because 95% of my online experiences have been nothing more than exercises in frustration.
Played it for 15 min on 360, got bored and deleted it, same with first L4D. Give me Dead Rising 2 please
In my opinion, this kind of elitist attitude is what ruins game communities. I've found both L4D and Demigod players to have this kind of attitude, and it is what causes new players to the game to leave it. What is a 'true' player? I would argue that there is no such thing, as each person has their own opinion on how they want to play the game.
Though you do sound a bit elitist I have to agree I can't really enjoy a game with internet people but am lucky enough to have 4 solid people I play with.
Played it for 15 min on 360, got bored and deleted it, same with first L4D. Give me Dead Rising 2 please
Hate to burst your bubble , but its the Internet. If you can't handle social situations then maybe you should play console games by yourself. There are going to be people that act in ways you may not like. Deal with it. I will agree with you that some people who connect to a game are absolutely annoying and probably pride themselves in being so, But you shouldn't let those people ruin the game for you. Just find a different server or tune them out. Remember if you don't pay any attention to them, they will go away.
Ding. There's been a lot of that lately. Back in the heyday of PC gaming, 32 on 32 matches didn't suffer much from one or even several people being morons, ragequitting, sucking, or being AFK. Now with 4 vs. 4 (L4D) and 8 vs. 8 (Battlefield Heroes), the problem is much more apparent. I think while developers would like to believe their matchmaking services are aggressive enough to keep servers full, they simply aren't. It might not be a problem with the programing, but that the pool of "available" players isn't enough. It's game design I've seen supported more often now, and it's simply self-defeating.Or maybe it's just that with only 4 people (or 8) the inevitable dickweed has more influence than he would in something like Battlefield.
The demo is pretty boring because single player and campaign are boring.
From what I've seen with the new infected and style of gameplay, it will be awesome. The sheer amount of strategy that can be implemented because of the new infected is ridiculous. I'm glad it's more than just: wait for boom and then lets go in with hunters.
Though you do sound a bit elitist I have to agree I can't really enjoy a game with internet people but am lucky enough to have 4 solid people I play with.
What is it with this elitist bullshit? If they're fucking tards, they're fucking tards. No debate
Epic battle with a bunch of friends
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I felt that the gun and hand textures were lower than in L4D1.
- The guns are better. Matchette is ovrepowered some I think. One one of my plays I went through the whole demo only using it. (on advanced).
- New infected are really good. Brings some variety.
- Some of the weapons seem improperly scaled. Like the Desert Eagle. It is HUGE. I should make some comparison screen shots of the DE with the AK47, UZI, G3, and others. For some reason I think the Desert Eagle would be the largest.
Other then that it feels exactly the same as the original. Not even close to being worth $50 to me.
I'll wait and get it for $25 or less, just like I did with L4D1.
This demo sucks
well, the fact that it won't play without stuttering sucks,
and yes I defragged and verified the game files and disabled multi-core
I have a gtx285 and 4.5Ghz. and new drivers and it still all stuttering sound and video
sigh....
valve used to be the best now they're just another EA....