imagine!
l....o..........l
I would love to see that...seriously...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
imagine!
imagine!
that is like computer porn... uncensored girl on girl action right there...
If that chart is realistic, that will be stunning.
Edit: I remember my title reading How Long before playing Crysis Warhead at 60fps constant 1920x1200 4xAA. But yah, must be at 4xAA, maximum settings! Mod probably shortened it for the long title.
Will the next gen video cards be able to do this, or perhaps the next next gen. This game has been out for quite some time and it's sad to see you can't play it without dropping below 60fps yet, even with all these monster dual gpu cards out.
If that chart is realistic, that will be stunning.
Crysis Warhead DX10 4x 1900x1200
Is that on 3 GTX285 or Quad GTX295?
no need to quote all the pics like that. just remove the image tags when quoting a reply with several pics.wow nice, any SS's during a firefight?
very high and high look different but tbh high looks just fine. why dont you just try it for yourself?For those of you who have somehow managed to get into the enthusiast shaders and other settings at higher resolutions, how is it? Is it really a cut above other games? Personally I can never judge a game looking at stills or trying to imagine what it would be like at a higher frame rate. I have to see it at a respectable frame rate in person to really form an opinion.
very high and high look different but tbh high looks just fine. why dont you just try it for yourself?
you have a gtx275 and just 20inch 1680x1050 screen right? you should be able to run it just fine on very high with about 35fps average. also if you dont look at the fps counter you will never know when you are dipping in the mid to upper 20s in Crysis.Well as I hinted, I don't have the hardware to really get it at a respectable frame rate. I can run it, but I personally think if you are dipping into 20s it gets hard to tell if it really looks good or not. Things don't move naturally.
you have a gtx275 and just 20inch 1680x1050 screen right? you should be able to run it just fine on very high.
well 4x AA does takes its toll. still your original question makes no sense. you could still put it on very high settings and see what it looks like. its not like it would be a slideshow for you especially if you left AA off for a bit.Are you kidding? It doesn't run with everything on very high. Not at frame rates that are any good. Sorry I forgot to mention 4xaa is a must have.
well 4x AA does takes its toll. still your original question makes no sense. you could still put it on very high settings and see what it looks like. its not like it would be a slideshow for you especially if you left AA off for a bit.
dual gpu results
well yeah and its ass ugly on those settings too. medium is a massive bump in visuals.looks more like its on minimum on all settings
with a gpu setup like that I see even an overclocked i7 being a bottleneck.Well 60fps may be here with the built in bench program, its actual "balls to the walls" fire fights at 60 fps (ave) is what I'm looking forwards too. Perhaps with an oc'd i7 and 3xSLI GT300 refreshes.