GotNoRice
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2001
- Messages
- 12,067
Ive been trying to get to the bottom of this problem for a long time. Basically we have crazy high power bills, and it just keeps getting higher. Right now were paying between $500 and $700 a month for power depending on if were using the AC or not. This is particularly frustrating because weve taken significant steps toward reducing our power consumption and yet its still gone higher. We got rid of an extra freezer in the garage still went higher. We got a new energy efficient washer and dryer, still went higher. We havnt used our AC for pretty much this entire last month because its been cool, and we still got a ~$570 bill.
I dont really know a good way to find out exactly what is using power or not. I came up with the idea of going to our power meter with a stop watch, and measuring how long it takes for the black mark on the flat spinning metal disc to make one complete revolution that is what these timings correspond to.
We started by taking a timing with everything on (computers and TVs and stuff, but not the oven or the AC or anything). This was to represent typical usage.
Minutes:Seconds:Milliseconds (doing this with a stop watch so there is maybe ½ second margin of error)
00:12:02 base time that is supposed to represent normal usage
Then we turned off every major device in the house (not the fridge, but basically everything with an off switch like lights, computers, tvs)
00:35:38 After turning off 5 computers and 3 TVs and some random lights.
From here is where things differ. We took two sets of easurements, and they are both based on turning fuses off or on. For the first set of timings, we started from the top of the fuse box and worked our way down, taking a timing after each fuse was turned off until they were all essentially turned off.
00:37:90 Washer/Oven/Family Room Fuse turned off
00:37:81 Dishwasher/Garbage Disposal/cooktop (stove I guess)
01:08:47 Kitchen/Dryer
01:30:99 Unmarked (not sure what this one is for)
01:33:49 Furnace
02:07:67 Lights/Plugs
04:00:23 Downstairs
--:--:-- Bedrooms (it was almost not moving, so we gave up before the time was complete)
Now these first set of timings seemed like they said a lot. Turning the computers and the TVs off (base timings) represented about a 23 second increase, but turning off the unmarked fuse represented a 22 second increase, turning off the lights/plugs fuse resulted in a 34 second increase, and turning off downstairs resulted in a 1 minute, 53 second increase. I started to think though, is it the increase in seconds that is relevant, or is it the total amount of time compared to the previous value. Like for example, Turning off the downstairs fuse resulted in almost a 2 minute increase, and double the previous measurement, but the initial measurement after we turned off the computers and TVs resulted in only a 23 second increase, but that was triple the previous time (~12 seconds to ~36 seconds). So what is significant?
We then did a 2nd set of timings. This time, all the fuses were on except for the one single fuse we were testing at that moment. All the devices inside that could be turned off, were still turned off, just as they have been throughout the test. Also, this time we tested the Kitchen and Dryer, and the dishwasher/disposal and cooktop, etc separately. I guess they are on the same fuses, but each have their own sub-fuse or something like that, whatever-
00:37:54 00:39:03 Base timing, all fuses on (took the time twice)
00:38:26 Dryer
01:01:49 Kitchen
00:47:03 cooktop
00:34:81 Dishwasher/Disposal (Dont really understand how this could be lower than the base timing, but I measured it twice)
00:37:07 Family Room/Washer
00:35:28 - Oven
00:35:58 Unmarked
00:35:88 Furnace
00:39:63 Lights/Plugs
00:40:68 Downstairs
00:48:85 Bedrooms
00:33:58 Timing again with all the fuses on, not sure why it was lower than the base timing, though its kind of hard to keep a 5 person family from turning stuff on during the hour it took to test this stuff.
Now the biggest thing that I dont understand is how the results from the two tests are so completely different. In the first test, we saw large increases in time when we turned off the unmarked fuse, lights/plugs, and downstairs, yet during the 2nd test, these only represented small if not insignificant increases in time. The only thing in the 2nd test that showed a significant amount of time increase was the kitchen.
Remember, increase in time = Decrease in power usage.
After having spent a total of about 2 and a half hours on this, I seem to have more questions than answers. I know that turning off 5 computers and 3 large TVs results in a significant decrease in power usage duh. I also know that the kitchen uses a lot of power duh. What I still dont know is why were paying $500+ while everyone I talk to pays no more than $200, even when they have as much electric shit running in their house as we do. Was timing the flat metal disc just a stupid way to do this or what? Sigh
Any help would be appreciated. Maybe if you guys have one of those old Westinghouse analog power meters like we do, run out there and do a quick timing and see how long it takes the flat metal disc to make one complete rotation. We got about 12 seconds with an average amount of stuff on, and about 36 seconds with most stuff turned off. Would be interesting to see how that compares to everyone else.
I dont really know a good way to find out exactly what is using power or not. I came up with the idea of going to our power meter with a stop watch, and measuring how long it takes for the black mark on the flat spinning metal disc to make one complete revolution that is what these timings correspond to.
We started by taking a timing with everything on (computers and TVs and stuff, but not the oven or the AC or anything). This was to represent typical usage.
Minutes:Seconds:Milliseconds (doing this with a stop watch so there is maybe ½ second margin of error)
00:12:02 base time that is supposed to represent normal usage
Then we turned off every major device in the house (not the fridge, but basically everything with an off switch like lights, computers, tvs)
00:35:38 After turning off 5 computers and 3 TVs and some random lights.
From here is where things differ. We took two sets of easurements, and they are both based on turning fuses off or on. For the first set of timings, we started from the top of the fuse box and worked our way down, taking a timing after each fuse was turned off until they were all essentially turned off.
00:37:90 Washer/Oven/Family Room Fuse turned off
00:37:81 Dishwasher/Garbage Disposal/cooktop (stove I guess)
01:08:47 Kitchen/Dryer
01:30:99 Unmarked (not sure what this one is for)
01:33:49 Furnace
02:07:67 Lights/Plugs
04:00:23 Downstairs
--:--:-- Bedrooms (it was almost not moving, so we gave up before the time was complete)
Now these first set of timings seemed like they said a lot. Turning the computers and the TVs off (base timings) represented about a 23 second increase, but turning off the unmarked fuse represented a 22 second increase, turning off the lights/plugs fuse resulted in a 34 second increase, and turning off downstairs resulted in a 1 minute, 53 second increase. I started to think though, is it the increase in seconds that is relevant, or is it the total amount of time compared to the previous value. Like for example, Turning off the downstairs fuse resulted in almost a 2 minute increase, and double the previous measurement, but the initial measurement after we turned off the computers and TVs resulted in only a 23 second increase, but that was triple the previous time (~12 seconds to ~36 seconds). So what is significant?
We then did a 2nd set of timings. This time, all the fuses were on except for the one single fuse we were testing at that moment. All the devices inside that could be turned off, were still turned off, just as they have been throughout the test. Also, this time we tested the Kitchen and Dryer, and the dishwasher/disposal and cooktop, etc separately. I guess they are on the same fuses, but each have their own sub-fuse or something like that, whatever-
00:37:54 00:39:03 Base timing, all fuses on (took the time twice)
00:38:26 Dryer
01:01:49 Kitchen
00:47:03 cooktop
00:34:81 Dishwasher/Disposal (Dont really understand how this could be lower than the base timing, but I measured it twice)
00:37:07 Family Room/Washer
00:35:28 - Oven
00:35:58 Unmarked
00:35:88 Furnace
00:39:63 Lights/Plugs
00:40:68 Downstairs
00:48:85 Bedrooms
00:33:58 Timing again with all the fuses on, not sure why it was lower than the base timing, though its kind of hard to keep a 5 person family from turning stuff on during the hour it took to test this stuff.
Now the biggest thing that I dont understand is how the results from the two tests are so completely different. In the first test, we saw large increases in time when we turned off the unmarked fuse, lights/plugs, and downstairs, yet during the 2nd test, these only represented small if not insignificant increases in time. The only thing in the 2nd test that showed a significant amount of time increase was the kitchen.
Remember, increase in time = Decrease in power usage.
After having spent a total of about 2 and a half hours on this, I seem to have more questions than answers. I know that turning off 5 computers and 3 large TVs results in a significant decrease in power usage duh. I also know that the kitchen uses a lot of power duh. What I still dont know is why were paying $500+ while everyone I talk to pays no more than $200, even when they have as much electric shit running in their house as we do. Was timing the flat metal disc just a stupid way to do this or what? Sigh
Any help would be appreciated. Maybe if you guys have one of those old Westinghouse analog power meters like we do, run out there and do a quick timing and see how long it takes the flat metal disc to make one complete rotation. We got about 12 seconds with an average amount of stuff on, and about 36 seconds with most stuff turned off. Would be interesting to see how that compares to everyone else.