Here Is the Official "AMD Radeon VII: World's First 7nm Gaming GPU" Reveal Trailer

Discussion in '[H]ard|OCP Front Page News' started by cageymaru, Jan 9, 2019.

  1. cageymaru

    cageymaru [H]ard|News

    Messages:
    18,623
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Here is the official AMD Radeon VII reveal trailer. The AMD Radeon VII is the world's first 7 nm gaming GPU. It has 3840 stream processors, 16 GB of HBM memory, 1 TB/s memory bandwidth, and features AMD FreeSync 2 HDR technology. Some details mentioned during AMD president and CEO Dr. Lisa Su's keynote speech include 60 compute units that run at up to 1.8 GHz, 4K max settings gaming, a $699 SEP (suggested etail price) and a February 7, 2019 launch date.

    AMD Radeon VII graphics brings maximum performance for hardcore enthusiast gamers, delivering incredible, ultra-smooth gaming experiences at consistently high FPS, in 1440p, ultrawide and 4K resolutions. Dominate your games and shatter records with the world's first 7nm gaming GPU, future-ready and built to meet the demands of high-performance gameplay.
     
  2. Rahh

    Rahh [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,549
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Here's hoping it performs!
     
    mynamehere likes this.
  3. andrewaggb

    andrewaggb Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    358
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    As I understand it:

    Pro's - Slightly cheaper than a 2080, equivalent performance, double the ram.
    Con's - No RTX, No CUDA.

    My Concerns: 16GB of HBM2 (if it's anything like Vega) suggests limited availability and that prices won't change much.
    Unknowns: Power consumption. It's 7nm so power might be comparable to nvidia this time around but we'll have to see.

    Other thoughts: Might be a good machine learning card vs the RTX 2080 with all the ram and raw processing power, depends how much the tensor cores help a given problem. Though you'll have to use custom AMD builds of tensorflow and may have less or no support in other frameworks.
     
  4. Twisted Kidney

    Twisted Kidney 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,386
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Please don't suck.
    Please don't suck.
    Please don't suck.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2019
    spikeline, c3k, GhostCow and 19 others like this.
  5. obiwansotti

    obiwansotti Gawd

    Messages:
    999
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2002
    What a bummer, 2080 performance at 2080 prices without the 2080 feature set.

    Only people who would really be interested in such a card are the people who need the 16GB of ram.
     
  6. dook43

    dook43 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,903
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    You're overestimating the amount of people that care about RTX
     
  7. Lakados

    Lakados Gawd

    Messages:
    1,014
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    In all fairness I was expecting at best 2070 performance at 2070 pricing without the 2000 series features. So they did better than I thought they would, now if they can actually build them and have them in stock and with luck maybe get something cool done with EKWB while they are at it I will be happy. I mean worst case nVidia drops $100 off the 2080 to counter so in either event that would be a win.
     
  8. andrewaggb

    andrewaggb Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    358
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    I think if an 8gb version was $100 cheaper and had otherwise equivalent performance that would be a good card to offer but I believe they are just offering their 7nm datacenter vega to consumers now. I suspect it's the exact same board and so they don't have to change anything to offer it this way.
     
    Jounar likes this.
  9. kirbyrj

    kirbyrj Why oh why didn't I take the BLUE pill?

    Messages:
    23,478
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Hopefully we get some "mainstream" cards soon.
     
    patchfile27 likes this.
  10. AlphaFox

    AlphaFox Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    282
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2016
    didnt you hear, $699 is the new mainstream, just like $1200 iPhones.
     
  11. and713

    and713 [H]Lite

    Messages:
    91
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Sounds like a good card to me, competitive at high end and a way to stabilize market cap until Navi is ready.
     
  12. El Derpo

    El Derpo Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    204
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2018
    You mean the raytracing that's literally unusable on the 2080?
     
  13. Lakados

    Lakados Gawd

    Messages:
    1,014
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    Mainstream is still running 1080p at <= 60hz, that makes up 2/3'rds of the gaming monitors still in use, so that puts them clear in the $300 card range which both AMD and nVidia have solid offerings for currently available for which these cards will offer no tangible benefit.
     
    Inacurate, Kinestron and Rahh like this.
  14. Snooble

    Snooble Gawd

    Messages:
    857
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    So let me get this straight :

    The took what was essentially the Vega 64, put it through the 7nm process bumped up the speed, doubled the memory, added no new technology to compete with the 2080 goods and it costs almost 2x as much as the current Vega 64, currently the same as the 2080 cards we see on NewEgg.

    Who in the fuck would blow the same amount of cash for older technology?

    AMD totally screwed themselves by not starting at a lower price point.

    "Here's your new updated Cavalier with just a turbo on it boys. Enjoy that 2.4 Ecotec!"
     
    trandoanhung1991, Elios and ptrout like this.
  15. pendragon1

    pendragon1 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,624
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    those feet at the end better belong to Ruby or im gonna be pissed!
     
  16. dook43

    dook43 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,903
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Nothing has changed with respect to the "technology" in question. DX12 is still the latest graphics API. If the performance is there, it will merit the cost... if it isn't, it won't.
    Not many enthusiasts are super interested in paying $1200 to barely run 1080P raytracing.
     
    Revdarian, Teenk9, hlfbkd420 and 3 others like this.
  17. Stiglite

    Stiglite n00bie

    Messages:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2019
    If the price and performance of the new Radeon can only trade blows with the 2080 I'm not impressed. The Radeon could be a great deal if they kept the price closer to ~500. Its too bad the price is so high I was hoping that we could see video cards get back to a somewhat reasonable price point again.
     
  18. Lakados

    Lakados Gawd

    Messages:
    1,014
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    The 2070 can be found around that price and is more than reasonable for what it offers at 1080 and 1440 which is where more than 80% of all gamers are playing at, so I am not sure what you are expecting.
     
    DF-1 likes this.
  19. Rahh

    Rahh [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,549
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    It comes with 3 AAA games and is $100 less than the 2080 while outperforming it. Most only have issues with no RTX but even the 2080 can't do RTX so there's no argument there. Not sure why anyone would be unhappy about this? Lower prices is always better I agree but would you pay $100 more for a 2080 that doesn't perform as well?
     
    DF-1 and Revdarian like this.
  20. 1Nocturnal101

    1Nocturnal101 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    338
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    Lol
    It probably isn't going to suck, but it probably won't be mind blowing either.

    Either way my hopes are on Navi for AMD as long as the arch is good they might be able to match on rasterization workloads or exceed them.
     
  21. Chebsy

    Chebsy Gawd

    Messages:
    515
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    I wonder why AMD reduced the number of stream processors when compared to Vega 64 ?
     
  22. 1Nocturnal101

    1Nocturnal101 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    338
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    After the updates the 2080 does fine with RTX fps I mean you aren't going to get 4k performance but reasonable 2k isn't out the window according to all the benchmarks, the 2080ti gets 60-90fps now at 1080p, and the 2060 apparantly targets 60fps or greater at 1080p with RTX in low, it's new so really without DLSS it's hard to quantify.

     
    trandoanhung1991 and Elios like this.
  23. Krizby

    Krizby n00bie

    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2017
    Since Radeon VII has 25% more perf/w than Vega 64 (say in one of the slide) while RTX 2080 is 90% more efficient than Vega 64 (source: Techpowerup's reviews), that means RTX 2080 is 65% more efficient, multiply that by 2080's TDP and we have a 350W TDP for Radeon VII (if anything the 3 fans 2.5 slot cooler already told us how much of a power hog this card is).
     
  24. tangoseal

    tangoseal [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,552
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Well AMD is pretty damn fast at compute tasks and in many more ways than nVidia, however, nVidia has its strengths too so I wont argue with the lack of Cuda.

    2ndly I am not sure if RTX is a big deal and if it is wasn't AMD suppose to implement some form of ray tracing on a hardware level soon anyways? I do not know enough about this though and am probably repeating fud or rumors.
     
  25. oldmanbal

    oldmanbal [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,926
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Feelsbad for everyone hoping for a mainstream card getting announced. They almost didn't even release this card so at least there's something for AMD enthusiasts to jam out on in 4k.
     
  26. SpeedyVV

    SpeedyVV [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,212
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2007
    I am very disappointed with the price/performance.

    No launch, so I am hoping that they are sandbagging! F*cking portuguese blood, always living in "hope".
     
  27. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,628
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    I thought lisa su said same power as 64... Or was it power envelope? Hnmm
     
  28. Krizby

    Krizby n00bie

    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2017
    Probably same power as Vega 64 LC edition
     
  29. Soulmetzger

    Soulmetzger [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,252
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    I'm kind of stuck with the green team because of having a G-sync monitor but I am more than happy AMD is trying to throw some heat nvidia's way.
     
  30. NickJames

    NickJames Viagra Required

    Messages:
    6,501
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Those boots at the end, are they bringing Ruby back?
     
  31. Stiglite

    Stiglite n00bie

    Messages:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2019
    If you shop around a 2080 can be found for around ~$700 with 2 free AAA games. At this price if performance is similar I would prefer the 2080 over the new Vega as it does have the RTX features that might be beneficial for future games. 16 gigs of ram is not needed for the performance level of this cards capabilities. AMD should have cut out some of the ram as well as the price and they might have a winner.
     
    trandoanhung1991 likes this.
  32. Ski

    Ski Gawd

    Messages:
    917
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Gonna try to follow up with both of you comments with one of my own. I'm looking at this from a 3d artist and rendering perspective and based on the tentative analysis of the specs (or lack there of in this case) AMD is clearly not in the market for GPU rendering because it requires CUDA cores, so their intent is pretty clear they're not interested. Which is understandable but troubling none the less because Nvidia will continue to have monopolistic control in this market. And unlike the severe amount of negativity RTX is getting with their raytracing engine, when it comes to gpu rendering, this is where it excels and if these early test benchmarks from Chaosgroup's VRay are any indication, then it's going to be an attractive seller.

    Flipping the script back to gaming, and admittedly I'm only a light gamer these days so have no skin in the game. But anyways, if the performance is only marginally better than the 2080, and the fact 90% of gamers won't ever take full advantage of 16GB of VRAM, and they're pricing it exactly as the same as the already overpriced 2080, no CUDA cores, then unfortunately in this humble mother fuckers opinion AMD dropped the ball, especially with the pricing. Unless they were to set the floor at $599 (and I could argue all day even $499 would be more attractive) then it's going to be difficult to convince the hobbyist gamer, or loyalist to jump ship.

    At the end of the day nobody is going to care about watts or any, gamers are going to speak with their wallets, and sadly for me I have no choice but to play Nvidia's long term strategy because I would love nothing more than to give them the bird after their arbitrary NDA's and forced Geforce program scandal. This is what happens when in a capitalistic system where there is no competition, progress stagnates and consumers lose to corporate interests and their shareholders.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2019
    trandoanhung1991 likes this.
  33. Flexion

    Flexion [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,551
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    If the same card was $500 to 550 AMD would have a winner.
     
    Nasty_Savage, Aioeyu and Ski like this.
  34. jardows

    jardows [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,329
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2015
    It's not that AMD aren't interested, but they cannot legally put CUDA cores into their products, as it is Nvidia proprietary technology. AMD does excel at OpenCL tasks, and there are plenty of applications that take advantage of that. Perhaps not the applications you use, but they are out there. The only thing AMD can do is make the best OpenCL performing cards they can, and work to increase the use of OpenCL over CUDA, which would be something not really discussed at this level unless there was a major breakthrough in OpenCL.
     
  35. DPI

    DPI Nitpick Police

    Messages:
    10,988
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    Still waiting for the heat.

    And guess what Nvidia does to 2080 price right before this comes out (assuming they even feel the need, which is in question now).
     
    trandoanhung1991 and Flexion like this.
  36. Rookie_One

    Rookie_One n00bie

    Messages:
    2
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2018
    Have to say : a suggested etail price ?
     
  37. El Derpo

    El Derpo Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    204
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2018
    NVIDIA won't lower anything.
     
    Flexion likes this.
  38. Snooble

    Snooble Gawd

    Messages:
    857
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    I'm guessing that Nvidia is going to compete by using the 2070 instead of the 2080. I'm betting we see sales on the 2070 then a permanent price decrease.

    When it's on sale is already an attractive card, if Nvidia plays smart they'll lower the cost to gain the mainstream buyers confidence again instead of trying to milk every one they can.

    The 2080 and the Radeon 7 are equal priced. Not many will buy the 7 and it's sad that AMD is attempting to dethrone Nvidia with what is ultimately a lesser product.

    We have a saying in the Canadian Air Force : "Yesterday's technology tomorrow!"... This seems to be how AMD is attempting competition.
     
  39. Flexion

    Flexion [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,551
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    If the GTX 1180 is actually real then the Radeon 7 is going to be a tough sell. Apparently the rumored 1180 is simply a 2080 card with the tensor cores taken out. (probably made from salvaged chips that are defective, etc.) I'm sure those would sell at a similar price or even lower.

    This is where I saw the rumored 1180 https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1180-spotted-on-gfxbench
     
  40. ecuador

    ecuador Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    176
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    The 16GB makes no sense. Is it an architecture limitation, like they HAD to ship it with 16GB if they wanted that many compute units or something like that?
     
    Lakados likes this.