[H] 680i & Yorkfield Support Statement from NV

FrgMstr

Just Plain Mean
Staff member
Joined
May 18, 1997
Messages
49,694
Read the story here.

The (680i) MCP fully supports both dual core Wolfdale and quad core Yorkfield, but at the board level, a motherboard circuit change is required for quad core YF.
 

ManicOne

Gawd
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
731
Definitely a result of NV/Intel bad blood. NV refusing to licence SLI on Intel chipsets, Intel hitting back with this Yorkfield crap. Weren't the ES Yorkfields fine on 680i? If that's the case these two companies need to get their shit together.

Biggest CPU manufacturer fighting biggest GPU manufacturer = all lose out.
 

astrojunke

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
245
"Intel is about to have their own video cards and “SLI” solutions in the market, possibly as early as 2008, and Intel is betting that when that happens, there will be little need for NVIDIA chipsets in the market place"

Nice finally Nvidia might have some competition. Me personally would rather have Intel chipsets and be able to SLI. I would never buy a 680i mobo after all the bad things I've heard.
 

qdemn7

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
May 2, 2002
Messages
4,378
So.....

Could, (and should), Nvidia sue Intel for restraint of trade, IF Intel simply refuses to license their CPUs to Nvidia after 2008?

What's your opinion Kyle?
 

BillParrish

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
7,520
/shrug, all Intel has to do is not disclose to Nvidia the engineering data for Nehalem board development and I would think the Nvidia chipset business would be mortally wounded. Is there some existing agreement that Intel must honor and share Nehalem engineering ?



Intel is about to have their own video cards and “SLI” solutions in the market, possibly as early as 2008
huh ? Skulltrail uses Nvidia chips embedded on the Intel board to provide SLI but are you talking about Intel coming up with their own proprietary video card "teaming" scheme ?

ALL INTEL INSIDE ! (Why does that make my wallet cringe in fear ? )
 

Zok

Limp Gawd
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Messages
193
I guess I've been living under a rock - since when did Intel announce / someone leak information that Intel would be producing dedicated graphics cards? I can't find any info on the net either... Someone help me out here please.
 

ManicOne

Gawd
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
731
So.....

Could, (and should), Nvidia sue Intel for restraint of trade, IF Intel simply refuses to license their CPUs to Nvidia after 2008?

What's your opinion Kyle?
Works both ways. NV refusing to license SLI on Intel chipsets means in court it would be hard for NV to win. They've kind of dug their own grave. Anyway, where does it say Intel is going to stop NV from making their own version of chipset?
 

Dan_D

Extremely [H]
Joined
Feb 9, 2002
Messages
56,217
Definitely a result of NV/Intel bad blood. NV refusing to licence SLI on Intel chipsets, Intel hitting back with this Yorkfield crap. Weren't the ES Yorkfields fine on 680i? If that's the case these two companies need to get their shit together.

Biggest CPU manufacturer fighting biggest GPU manufacturer = all lose out.
I don't think that this went down like that at all. I seriously doubt that Intel designed Yorkfield and Wolfdale chips with the goal of making them incompatible with 680i SLI boards.
 

ManicOne

Gawd
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
731
I don't think that this went down like that at all. I seriously doubt that Intel designed Yorkfield and Wolfdale chips with the goal of making them incompatible with 680i SLI boards.
I would agree with you but there seems to be a lot of peeps on different forums saying their engineering sample Yorkies run fine. Just what changed between ES and commercial release?
 

Dan_D

Extremely [H]
Joined
Feb 9, 2002
Messages
56,217
I would agree with you but there seems to be a lot of peeps on different forums saying their engineering sample Yorkies run fine. Just what changed between ES and commercial release?
I wasn't aware that any of the Yorkfield Engineering samples worked on 680i SLI boards. If that is indeed the case then perhaps I was wrong concerning the hatred between Intel and NVIDIA.
 

silent-circuit

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Sep 18, 2005
Messages
16,133
I want to know exactly what this 'circuit change' is. If it's something that requires balls and a soldering iron I'll be among the first to give in a shot. I suspect it'd be a variation on what a few people over at XS have already done to improve the voltage regulation of the board and reduce or eliminate vdroop. If it's at the PCB level, which it may well be... eh.
 

onegoodsoul

Weaksauce
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
64
The sad thing is that a lot of board manufacturers (Abit, Asus, Evga, etc) are going to "take a hit on their PR chin" over this when really they had nothing to due with it. In the end, the end consumers (us), who paid $200 plus for their 680i board takes the biggest hit.

Imagine a world where Nvidia and Intel worked together to ensure compatibility so that the customer doesn't get burned. This would be a world where Intel and Nvidia grew their consumer base instead of shrinking it.

I am sure a few Intel/Nvidia folks will move over to the AMD/Crossfire solution over this in the coming several months. Let's see if AMD can release the products to keep them there.

Competition is a good thing.
 

Slade

2[H]4U
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
2,539
As it stands, nVidia really is the company with a lot to lose. If they don't sort things out with Intel, AMD can really shine with their native solutions that cover CPU, MB and GPU and work best together.

If nvidia wants to play ball as the king of the hill GPU maker, they have to work with intel to make SLI work there too even if it hurts their mb board share. Though if nvidia can come up with something more stable, better performing, cheaper than intel on a mb front, then all the power to them.
 

Nenu

[H]ardened
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
19,199
This isnt so bad for NVidia.
Intel have produced a chip that isnt compatible with 680i so they will probably take the rap for it.
NVidia make a new board and sell lots more!

Unless it can be proven that NVidia changed the design or introduced a flaw, NVidia shouldnt look bad.
I dont think this is any form of company fighting, just the way it goes.
 

twatt

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Mar 16, 2002
Messages
1,315
Intel coming up with their own video card and SLI solution. And AMD/ATI.

So we use to have two (I guess you can say three or more) companies making cpu's, a few making chipsets, a couple making video cards. Now companies are consolidating more and more. Pretty soon it will basically be two companies for cpu, gpu and chipset.

Good for business, bad for us.
 

FrgMstr

Just Plain Mean
Staff member
Joined
May 18, 1997
Messages
49,694
A good flashback read from April of this year.

State of the Silicon Union - Q207

I got some of it wrong, but even if AMD would have scaled to 3GHz as expected, which they still might, things would be back on track for them somewhat. But anyway, the statement above made me remember saying this back in April.

I think the “big guy” in the technology market that looks to be most vulnerable in the near future is NVIDIA. Undoubtedly it is doing almost everything correct at the moment, but it is about to have fierce competitors that it has never faced before in the GPU market. Most notably is Intel. It is no secret that Intel is structuring to move into the GPU market in the coming years.
 

BillParrish

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
7,520
Yep time to buy 1000 shares of Intel.

NVIDIA stresses that we look forward to the next-gen chipset for support, which of course requires buying a new motherboard.
lol , a reworked 680i with a pci-e 2.0 add on chip, next gen HA !

And I feel for the recent 680i buyers but look at what Intel has done to Intel customers over the last 14 mounts,

Board after board with minimal performance increases, same cpu respun with new numbers but NO performance increase. It is not like the new ones are any faster than my OCed E6300 I bought the first day C2D's were available. OK more cache, /yawn. We (that hang around here and places like it ) are knowledable enough to avoid the major BS but the average consumer ?

Intel is clearly in the divers seat and within the 6 months has started acting that way, at least it seems that way to me. An you know, they are in business first and foremost to make money. But dear God no, we do not need another Microsoft on the hardware side.
 

conscript

2[H]4U
Joined
Mar 19, 2001
Messages
2,600
I don't understand why NV didn't license SLi to intel in the first place. I mean, AMD licenses Crossfire to intel, and you'd think they'd be more in a position to say no and they don't? Or is that a remnant of the old ATI agreeing to it and AMD inheriting it? Either way, this little squabble certainly bumps AMD's spider platform's attractiveness in my eyes, and come Q2 if AMD gets their 45nm up to decent speeds, that's exactly the route I'm going. Speed is great, but not at the cost of incompatability.
 

rennyf77

2[H]4U
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
2,865
purely conjecture on my part, but this intel nvidia mash up may simply be about intel seeing profitability in the discrete graphics market. both company's boards are ubiquitous among enthusiasts, when was the last time you went to frys and didn't see as many intel boards as nvidia boards? considering this stalemate, and intel's dominance in the cpu market, challenging nvidia on the gpu front seems almost practical.
 

michael.pa2

2[H]4U
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
2,998
If Intel does enter the graphics race,it could be the kick in the pants Nvidia needs.They've faced little competition from ATI,and they've counted on people buying their motherboards just to get SLI.With the money and resources Intel has,they could give them real competition.Their motherboard chipsets are clearly superior,add their own graphics cards and SLI alternative,and Nvidia could be in trouble.
 

MultiMan

n00b
Joined
Oct 31, 2007
Messages
10
I don't understand why NV didn't license SLi to intel in the first place. I mean, AMD licenses Crossfire to intel, and you'd think they'd be more in a position to say no and they don't? Or is that a remnant of the old ATI agreeing to it and AMD inheriting it?...
Well, as I understand it, nVidia doesn't even allow Crossfire certification logo besides their own on PSU boxes. They don't want anyone to believe that Crossfire is even remotely similar/as good as SLi. This could be one reason they held back licensing SLi to Intel.
 

spincut

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
1,191
One problem though, is anyone REALLY going to be tempted to buy an intel graphics card over an Nvidia? SLI solutions is one thing, but video cards.... i dunno
 

Hypernova

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Messages
2,028
One problem though, is anyone REALLY going to be tempted to buy an intel graphics card over an Nvidia? SLI solutions is one thing, but video cards.... i dunno
Who knows? Intel does have years of experience making highly efficient GFX shader pipes for their chip sets. Coupled with possible 32nm process advantage by 2009 who knows what hundreds of those currently low power pipes combined can do?

With the market possibly split into Intel/AMD for complete solutions Nvedia would become the odd man out. should both camp decide to hold back technical details to Nvedia to handicap Nvedia it could be in a real shit hole.
 

michael.pa2

2[H]4U
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
2,998
One problem though, is anyone REALLY going to be tempted to buy an intel graphics card over an Nvidia? SLI solutions is one thing, but video cards.... i dunno
If their cards are better,you can bet people will buy them.Especially coupled with their own SLI motherboards that have the stability Intel chipsets are known for.It's a logical next step for Intel,they know the only reason people buy Nvidia's MB's is for the SLI,( it certainly isn't for their dependability).By developing their own cards,they not only open a new area for profit,they also probably drastically cut down Nvidia's competition in motherboard sales.
 

jon67

Gawd
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
576
Well, as I understand it, nVidia doesn't even allow Crossfire certification logo besides their own on PSU boxes. They don't want anyone to believe that Crossfire is even remotely similar/as good as SLi. This could be one reason they held back licensing SLi to Intel.
Ironically, HD3870 CF turns out to be just as good or better than 8800GT SLI, at least without AA/AF:

http://en.expreview.com/?p=53&page=4

Conclusion is, Nvidia needs to get into the CPU business. But do they have what it takes?
 

Caliche

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
356
I find it hard to believe that Intel could just jump in the Graphic's market! It took Nvidia years or research and development to get where they are. With that said, does Intel has a patent sharing technology agreement with Nvidia, because they must have, if Intel believe's that they can get in the Graphics market and have a competitive solution over the Big 2!

If Intel has the business concept and strategy of "Doing what is good for Intel but not doing good for the Group also"....fella's than we are in for a rough future!
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
41
Intel is in the graphics business, granted, none of us think about this much because it's only integrated graphics, but it wasn't so long ago that Intel tried to become a player in the high-end segment. Doesn't anybody remember the i740 graphics card? It was availible at the same time as GeForce2, Ati's Rage, and 3DFX's Voodoo.
 

Toytown

Gawd
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
996
My gut bet is that Intel has kept NVIDIA at arm’s length when it comes to new technology which of course is now going to upset a lot of NVIDIA motherboard owners
Even if Intel did, NVIDIA would have known sometime ago that the CPU simply would not work in the boards. But instead of doing the right thing and informing consumers as quickly as possible they simply ignored it so as not to hurt sales of the 680
 

mashie

Mawd Gawd
Joined
Oct 25, 2000
Messages
4,205
I wasn't aware that any of the Yorkfield Engineering samples worked on 680i SLI boards. If that is indeed the case then perhaps I was wrong concerning the hatred between Intel and NVIDIA.
Intel changed the microcode on the CPUs between ES and retail so all that really is needed is a BIOS update on the i680. However it seems Intel refuse to share the microcode information until Nvida give up the SLI license. :mad:

The reason a separate component now is needed to get it working isn't technical, but due to licensing.
 

brom42

2[H]4U
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
3,980
Intel is in the graphics business, granted, none of us think about this much because it's only integrated graphics, but it wasn't so long ago that Intel tried to become a player in the high-end segment. Doesn't anybody remember the i740 graphics card? It was available at the same time as GeForce2, Ati's Rage, and 3DFX's Voodoo.
QFT. Intel's graphic solutions are the largest percentage in the graphics market. I think that Intel graphic solutions are actually in over 50% of all the laptops. Intel is just trying to re-enter the discrete graphics market. I remember seeing some computers at work that came with i740 Intel cards, they weren't anything notable when it came to 3D, but the driver support and image clarity was way above the SiS and VIA integrated solution that a lot of our low end machines had.
 

AthlonXP

Fully [H]
Joined
Oct 14, 2001
Messages
20,400
notice how it says its multicore ready for 45nm chips, but it doesn't say quad core though....
 
Top