Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's the generally accepted best training material/method? I just finished setting up my lab and I'm looking into the actual educational aspect now.
Woot! Passed ICND2. Now I'm a CCNA. Feels good. Thanks to you guys for your help with questions. Now time to start CCNA Voice
Woot! Passed ICND2. Now I'm a CCNA. Feels good. Thanks to you guys for your help with questions. Now time to start CCNA Voice
how was your experience with the test?
Easy/hard?
lots of time left/barely scraped by?
clear questions/some ambiguety?
Hi everyone,
I am commited and have decided to start studying for CCENT. I just had a quick question about hardware and software for my lab.
Can you recommend me some equipment/software that would be a good start?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought you could use PacketTracer to at least pass the CCNA tests (maybe not the others).
His "magic number" way of subnetting is excellent. I've seen some that are ridiculous.
I tried several different methods for subnetting. I knew the concept, and I could do it, it just took a while. After a few different people trying to explain it, it just clicked. I could do it easily in my head. I don't know which method worked, as it wasn't really a conscience thing. It was a 'here's the number, and here's the answer'. I will have to think about it, but the math is just done in my head. More of a habit (similar to 100+100 = 200 - you just know it). I have to think and subtract and whatnot, but it just works.
So, if a method doesn't work. Try a different one. Then practice with it. If that doesn't work as good as you want, try a different method. Eventually, either through practice or some method, it will just start working for you (maybe). It's like other math concepts, some people can pick them up real quick, other people need a different point of view.
Subnetting is supposedly one of the most difficult topics for the CCNA, and it is until you can master it. Then, it's just another simple topic. Once you learn it, you know it and it's easy. CCNA tests big on it (and not just general 'what subnet' questions - they are part of the bigger question).
Hey all.
So been a slacker with trying to get my CCENT however I think I'm getting a bit closer to being ready for the test.
I've got me a lab (2x 2950, 3x2621XM and all the cables). I find the lab useful however once I found packet tracer I haven't really used it that much. I like the ability to add whatever into the packet tracer and it's awesome.
Gone through the Odom ICND1 book front to back and doing the Boson tests now. Are the Boson test questions close to what the actual ICND1 exam would be?
Also picked up that groupon for the ITU (http://www.ituniversityonline.com/) Cisco course, the videos are nice and a bit of good information in there but it's lacking in a lot of areas and I'm glad I'm not relying on that alone or there would be no way I could pass the ICND1 exam. Has anyone else used this service? Their practice tests are not nearly as difficult as Boson. for $99 it was ok, but I feel sorry for someone who spent the $4k on those courses.
I'm thinking next week for trying for my exam....Boson's practice tests are making me think twice though. The post above mine mentions Network+, if I can get through CCENT could the Network+ be doable as well based off the same knowledge?
Those are the ones I used, along with packet tracer and a little bit of GNS3. Most of my work was done in packet tracer, it's a pretty good simulation software.So I've been mandated by my company to start getting these certs...I have no idea where to begin!
I started browsing Amazon for books...
http://www.amazon.com/b?ie=UTF8&node=379347011
Which ones should I start off with for the CCNA exam? Would these 2 suffice along with using GNS3?
CCENT/CCNA ICND1 640-822 Official Cert Guide (3rd Edition) by Wendell Odom
CCNA ICND2 640-816 Official Cert Guide (3rd Edition) by Wendell Odom
Those are the ones I used, along with packet tracer and a little bit of GNS3. Most of my work was done in packet tracer, it's a pretty good simulation software.
Just so you know, i used the second edition of those books, and I had to read them critically questioning every single sentence and every ip address because there was a REDICULOUS amount of errors in the book (especially the chapter quizes/questions). The errata they provided on their website didn't fix all of them either.
I don't know how the third editions hold up.
So I'm starting off reading the Lammle CCNA Book...finishing reading thru Chapter 1 and 2 a few times. In the Chapter 2 practice test there are some questions about the different Ethernet cable types...there are 18 different cable types in total in the chapter...is it even worth stressing over memorizing these types? How important is memorization of things like this (atleast within the first 3 chapter types) for the CCNA exam?
So I'm starting off reading the Lammle CCNA Book...finishing reading thru Chapter 1 and 2 a few times. In the Chapter 2 practice test there are some questions about the different Ethernet cable types...there are 18 different cable types in total in the chapter...is it even worth stressing over memorizing these types? How important is memorization of things like this (atleast within the first 3 chapter types) for the CCNA exam?
Chapter 4... subnetting basics....he refers to "subnetting in your head", however I cannot subnet without writing out the "formula" on paper, I guess I must be mildly stupid....will I be at a huge disadvantage during the test if I need to write out a table for it.
Chapter 4... subnetting basics....he refers to "subnetting in your head", however I cannot subnet without writing out the "formula" on paper, I guess I must be mildly stupid....will I be at a huge disadvantage during the test if I need to write out a table for it.
I was allowed time right before the test to write out anything from my memory onto a whiteboard. I just wrote out the subnet tables for quick reference, my proctor said it was ok. Others from a different forum suggested I do that, even for future ccnp level tests too if allowed