- Joined
- Dec 24, 2008
- Messages
- 2,232
excuse me for summarizing my post, but i reloaded packet tracer and now my network is working perfectlyBLA BLA BLA i have a big network with OSPF and i want you guys to fix it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
excuse me for summarizing my post, but i reloaded packet tracer and now my network is working perfectlyBLA BLA BLA i have a big network with OSPF and i want you guys to fix it
good luck!Booked my ICND2 for the 5th of October (my birthday). Bunch of WIC-2Ts coming this week along with some serial cables and a 2801.
![]()
i drew that up because i wanna make sure i have that right, does all of that look correct?
I got confused when the IOS commands called one port the outside and the other the inside, yet global inside seems to refer to the source address on the outside network.
I'm still learning this stuff along with you, so bear with meIt seems to be that you need to use the map command when doing multi-point, but you can use interface-dlci when doing point-to-point. Correct?
How often do you guys actually run into these circuits? Are they still fairly common or are they more the "IRQ" section of the A+ exam? (You learn them in case you run across it, but nothing new really uses them. (Yes I know IRQs are still used but you rarely need to dick with them anymore))
yeah, i guess that usually makes sense. I guess i'm just getting confused because one concept refers to the actual networks (inside or outside network)I saw that a lot on the PIX firewalls I have been working with. I just always remembered Inside = My stuff, may or may not be right though. With what I was doing it was though.
oh, btw, i posted this a while ago and never really got a satisfying answer.thank you, i have one more question. In packet tracer simulation software the serial cables are labeled either DTE or DCE (not the ends! the cable itself!) is this an oversimplification or perhaps just plain incorrect?
Booked my ICND2 for the 5th of October (my birthday). Bunch of WIC-2Ts coming this week along with some serial cables and a 2801.
Ok, so spanning-tree. Does spanning-tree care about VLANs? IE: Do you need a default VLAN for the spanning-tree hellos to go between switches? Or since it's multicast, will they still go through?
I guess my question is, does it need to be configured differently whether it's a regular port or part of an etherchannel or a trunk port? Say you have 4 switches in a ring. Can you have certain VLANs go "one-way" and other VLANs "the other way"? Or is it a all traffic either goes this or that way, not split?
Dur. Ignore my question. I rewatched the section of CBT Nuggets on STP. Makes sense now.
I saw that a lot on the PIX firewalls I have been working with. I just always remembered Inside = My stuff, may or may not be right though. With what I was doing it was though.
My Router#show ip nat trans
Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside global
udp x.x.61.0:52 10.0.0.2:123 96.47.67.105:123 96.47.67.105:123
udp x.x.61.0:123 10.0.0.4:123 64.90.182.55:123 64.90.182.55:123
udp x.x.61.0:123 10.0.0.4:123 96.47.67.105:123 96.47.67.105:123
udp x.x.61.0:46 10.0.0.5:123 64.90.182.55:123 64.90.182.55:123
Ok, so spanning-tree. Does spanning-tree care about VLANs? IE: Do you need a default VLAN for the spanning-tree hellos to go between switches? Or since it's multicast, will they still go through?
I guess my question is, does it need to be configured differently whether it's a regular port or part of an etherchannel or a trunk port? Say you have 4 switches in a ring. Can you have certain VLANs go "one-way" and other VLANs "the other way"? Or is it a all traffic either goes this or that way, not split?
Dur. Ignore my question. I rewatched the section of CBT Nuggets on STP. Makes sense now.
excuse me for summarizing my post, but i reloaded packet tracer and now my network is working perfectly. I am blaming this on packet tracer software.
yeah, i cross check with GNS3 but didn't use it very often because mine crashed every 5 or so minutes (the dynamips system would crash, GNS3 would still be fine)I would reccommend GNS3, it cant really do any switching but it is awesome for Routing since you are working with real IOS.
OSPF - OK, say I'm advertising 192.168.0.0 /20 and I add .17.x, .18.x, .19.x, and .20.x. Can I then advertise 192.168.0.0 /20 and 192.168.16.0 /22 ? Basically, can I do VLSM in the summarizations or do I need to use 192.168.0.0 /19 and then waste 12 networks?
Yes VLSM is supported in everything except RIPv1.
Leader#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 2 masks
O IA 10.0.0.0/30 [110/256] via 10.0.0.17, 00:00:11, Serial0/0/0
O IA 10.0.0.4/30 [110/192] via 10.0.0.17, 00:00:11, Serial0/0/0
O 10.0.0.12/30 [110/128] via 10.0.0.17, 00:00:11, Serial0/0/0
C 10.0.0.16/30 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0
O IA 10.0.1.0/24 [110/193] via 10.0.0.17, 00:00:11, Serial0/0/0
Frick Rack Ears are expensive. I can find them for like 5-10 bucks on eBay but the shipping is like $25 to
Canada. They charge 3 bucks to ship within the States. What a ripoff. It costs like 4 bucks to ship a set of rack ears through USPS.
Anyone know of a cheap place to get them in Canada or does anyone have any they want to get rid of? I'm looking for some for a 2801 and a 2611.
Retarded. PacketTracer doesn't support the range command under OSPF. Lame. I guess it's not part of CCNA, but still....
So this is my routing table from one of my routers. It is in Area 1 currently. Everything is working, but I just want to verify my OSPF config. Since I can't do a range command, this looks correct? Theoretically if I could do a range command on the 10.0.0.17 router, the table should only have one line for 10.0.0.0/29, correct? Like this: O IA 10.0.0.0/29 [110/256] via 10.0.0.17, 00:00:11, Serial0/0/0
EECLTCI1#show ip route eigrp
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 29 subnets, 4 masks
D 10.0.74.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.75.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.72.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:18, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.64.8/30 [90/307200] via 10.0.64.6, 00:42:44, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.73.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.78.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.79.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.76.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.64.12/30 [90/307200] via 10.0.64.1, 00:42:44, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.77.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.66.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:18, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.67.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.64.0/18 is a summary, 00:43:21, Null0
D 10.0.65.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.70.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.71.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.68.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.69.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0
D 10.0.80.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:17, FastEthernet0/1
D 10.0.64.16/30 [90/284160] via 10.0.64.6, 00:42:45, FastEthernet0/0
[90/284160] via 10.0.64.1, 00:42:45, FastEthernet0/1
D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/309760] via 10.0.64.6, 00:42:48, FastEthernet0/0
[170/309760] via 10.0.64.1, 00:42:48, FastEthernet0/1
EECLTCI1#show run int s0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 210 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0
bandwidth 8000
ip address 10.0.255.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
ip authentication key-chain eigrp 100 EIGRP-SEC
ip summary-address eigrp 100 10.0.64.0 255.255.192.0 5
clock rate 8000000
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
end
EELAXCI1#show ip route eigrp
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 13 subnets, 4 masks
D 10.0.64.0/18 [90/857600] via 10.0.255.2, 00:00:40, Serial0/0
I don't have a scaled out OSPF lab right now, but I have a massive EIGRP one setup and I will show you the beauty of sumarization.
![]()
I removed a few routes from the routing table for this example.You can see on this side that the 10.0.64.0/18 network hasn't been summarized and the routing table is crowded and massive
Code:EECLTCI1#show ip route eigrp 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 29 subnets, 4 masks D 10.0.74.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.75.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.72.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:18, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.64.8/30 [90/307200] via 10.0.64.6, 00:42:44, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.73.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.78.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.79.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.76.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.64.12/30 [90/307200] via 10.0.64.1, 00:42:44, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.77.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:16, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.66.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:18, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.67.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.64.0/18 is a summary, 00:43:21, Null0 D 10.0.65.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.70.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.71.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.68.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.69.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.6, 00:33:19, FastEthernet0/0 D 10.0.80.0/24 [90/409600] via 10.0.64.1, 00:34:17, FastEthernet0/1 D 10.0.64.16/30 [90/284160] via 10.0.64.6, 00:42:45, FastEthernet0/0 [90/284160] via 10.0.64.1, 00:42:45, FastEthernet0/1 D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/309760] via 10.0.64.6, 00:42:48, FastEthernet0/0 [170/309760] via 10.0.64.1, 00:42:48, FastEthernet0/1
However, when you configure this on the S0/0 interface...
Code:EECLTCI1#show run int s0/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 210 bytes ! interface Serial0/0 bandwidth 8000 ip address 10.0.255.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay ip authentication key-chain eigrp 100 EIGRP-SEC ip summary-address eigrp 100 10.0.64.0 255.255.192.0 5 clock rate 8000000 frame-relay lmi-type ansi end
. On this side there is a single entry
Code:EELAXCI1#show ip route eigrp 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 13 subnets, 4 masks D 10.0.64.0/18 [90/857600] via 10.0.255.2, 00:00:40, Serial0/0
This was done on GNS3 0.8.3
Am i correct in saying that this is pointless. If you're in VTP transparent mode then neither domain or password matter right?Configure and verify Sw1 and Sw2 as VTP Transparent switches. Both switches should be in the VTP domain named CISCO. Secure VTP messages with the password CISCO.
i was doing this lab
http://www.howtonetwork.net/public/1394.cfm
and this came up
Am i correct in saying that this is pointless. If you're in VTP transparent mode then neither domain or password matter right?
one of the labs i was doing asked to create a macro. My book doesn't mention macros. Packet Tracer doesn't seem to support macros. My 3600 series router in GNS3 doesn't support the macro command. My older 2900 series xl and 3500 series xl physical switches don't support macros.
Is this a new command on newer switches and has anyone seen this tested on the CCNA?
EEUSDS013550#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
EEUSDS013550(config)#int f0/1
EEUSDS013550(config-if)#switchport host
switchport mode will be set to access
spanning-tree portfast will be enabled
channel group will be disabled
EEUSDS013550(config-if)#do show run int f0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 81 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
end
EEUSDS013550(config-if)#end
EEUSDS013550#show ver
Cisco IOS Software, C3550 Software (C3550-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(52)SE, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
It was skimmed over when I was studying SWITCH. One pre-configured macro is "switchport host".
Code:EEUSDS013550#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. EEUSDS013550(config)#int f0/1 EEUSDS013550(config-if)#switchport host switchport mode will be set to access spanning-tree portfast will be enabled channel group will be disabled EEUSDS013550(config-if)#do show run int f0/1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 81 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport mode access spanning-tree portfast end EEUSDS013550(config-if)#end EEUSDS013550#show ver Cisco IOS Software, C3550 Software (C3550-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(52)SE, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
R1
frame map ip 10.0.0.2 102
frame map ip 10.0.0.3 103
R2
frame map ip 10.0.0.1 201
frame map ip 10.0.0.3 201
R3
frame map ip 10.0.0.1 301
frame map ip 10.0.0.2 301
Serial Broadcasts
![]()
Here's the setup, i was asked to create this setup and setup OSPF on it.
I was also asked to statically map the ip addresses to the DLCI interfaces.
here's what i did
Code:R1 frame map ip 10.0.0.2 102 frame map ip 10.0.0.3 103Code:R2 frame map ip 10.0.0.1 201 frame map ip 10.0.0.3 201You can see i didn't use the "broadcast" keyword at the end of all of those commands.Code:R3 frame map ip 10.0.0.1 301 frame map ip 10.0.0.2 301
Naturally OSPF failed miserably and pings to 255.255.255.255 gave me nothing.
So next i redid all of the commands with the broadcast keyword.
Here is where i am confused. OSPF is working, but it's clearly not a true broadcast network as R2 and R3 can't see each other directly, but only through R1. A ping of 255.255.255.255 from either R2 or R3 showed replies only from R1, and 255.255.255.255 ping from R1 showed replies from both R2 and R3. Pinging the routers directly works fine though, no issues there.
Interestingly, pinging R3 from R2 shows 2 duplicate packets leaving R2 destined for 255.255.255.255 (since it has two broadcast maps) for each of the 4 attempts. But R1 accepts both of them for itself since it matches 255.255.255.255 and replies to both of them.
At this point I'm wondering what's the point of adding "broadcast" at the end of the network if its still clearly not a broadcast network. Is it simply because the ip stack defaults to not accepting 255.255.255.255 pings to a serial device and putting "broadcast" tells the ip stack to accept this ip address?
I've also noticed that the destination router doesn't forward the broadcast packet onwards to other devices on the same subnet. i guess it makes sense, i meant, it accepts the broadcast packet as destined to its own interface, why would it make a copy and forward it out on the same interface it recieved it on? Plus routers don't forward any type of broadcasts in general right?