• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

BFS scheduling tweaks

C

cactus

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
422
Has anyone tried changing scheduling priority or rr_interval for BFS?

Right now I have rr-interval set to 300 (from 6, in ms) and SCHED_BATCH for fah6 and all of its children. I am going to try SCHED_ISO because it is mentioned in CK's scheduling doc.

SR-2 3.6GHz, kraken, 3.1 with BFS
WU Time Prio:rr_interval
6903 ~27:28 SCHED_BATCH:300
6903 ~27:27 SCHED_ISO:300 - thinking there are not enough processes running for prio to matter
6903 ~27:41 SCHED_ISO:150
 
Last edited:
I never messed with them when I had PCs that benefited from them. Let us know what you find out.
 
cactus said:
Has anyone tried changing scheduling priority or rr_interval for BFS?

Right now I have rr-interval set to 300 (from 6, in ms) and SCHED_BATCH for fah6 and all of its children. I am going to try SCHED_ISO because it is mentioned in CK's scheduling doc.

SR-2 3.6GHz, kraken, 3.1 with BFS
6903 TPF ~27:28 w/ SCHED_BATCH
6903 TPF ~27:27 w/ SCHED_ISO - thinking there are not enough processes running for prio to matter
Click to expand...

Congratulations on the extra 168 ppd. ;)
 
Time increased when dropping the rr_interval to 150, still not by much
 
cactus said:
Time increased when dropping the rr_interval to 150, still not by much
Click to expand...
300 seems to be the sweet spot I've recently discovered for my dedicated CLI only folders.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top