-Snip-
The OC does worse than the stock, seems legit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
-Snip-
Maybe AMD shouldn't have marketed it so hard as a "4K card", with 4K slathered over all the slides in their E3 presentation.
Gta v benches look odd.
And Steam HW survey doesn't account for all the people like me gaming 4K on a 1080 or 1440 display with DSR/VSR.
And what exactly has been the benefit of HDMI 2.0 on those cards? Yeah you can say you have it and wave the Nvidia pride flag but who actually is using it?
HDMI 2.0 the most worthless thing since _______. (fill in the blank)
Need a graph of how HDMI crappers were actually ever going to buy a Fury.
damn this thread was a goofy ass ride.
the fury x looks somewhat juicy, but it aint enough (same with the 980ti).
4GB really is an issue for the non-1080p'ers/AA junkies like meself (trad. and shader-based); call me a minority, call me an enthusiast, it doesnt matter. i dont buy a GPU just to play todays games, i want it to play tomorrow's games too, and unless vram usage goes down in future games (ha... but hey it could), vanilla settings at 4k will likely eat up 4GB+ at times. most important to me however is having the headroom for modding and forcing graphics settings. i already have a card with 4GB, i already run ~4k resolutions (how close to 4k depends on the game), and i already max out 4GB. you know when youve maxed out your vram, you can feel it, as im sure a lot of yall know.
and of course you dont need a 4k tv to run games at 4k, nor do you need a 4k tv to see the benefits of running a game at 4k. if your pc clobbers 1080p and you have a 1080p monitor, downsample ya doofus - free image quality.
~50fps w/ far cry 4 @4k? that isnt exciting, however the minimum fps of ~40 is pretty damn good. a delta of ~10 fps between the avg and minimum? fuck yeah.
if HBM1 can show a nice tangible boost, thatll make HBM2 really exciting.
and big screens are where its at. 144hz better than 60hz? no shit. higher PPI a good thing? of course. but there are ~5" 1440p phone screens... how come no one uses those for gaming? because comparatively, small screens suck. high PPI is amazing, but small screens suck. they suck hard.
hdmi 2.0 aint hot shit, but i can say hdmi 1.4a sucks shit. any of yall ever played a game at 24hz or 30hz? its miserable. go create custom resolutions at those refresh rates and play a game. its unacceptable. hdmi 2.0 sucks due to color limitations, but if youre stuck using hdmi and want 4k gaming, having to use 1.4a is a legitimate complaint, esp. if 4k gaming is, you know, one of the main marketing points of a flagship gpu. hope the vendors offer 2.0.
all in all, fuck yeah amd. fury x is not a card for me, but if itll light a fire under nvidias ass, cheers!
Well I think their graphics division will keep them going, possibly flat to little loss, much less then they had this quarter till Zen comes out, if Zen isn't good, they are going to have problems,
Their credit rating has been slashed from B+ to B- if I'm not mistaken, this past quarter, so loans are out of the question, not to mention they are paying high interest on the current loan they are in right now.
Gta v benches look odd.
Midnight EST or 8:00 AM EST.Sorry to interrupt this meandering meeting of hotdog and condiment aficionados, but does anyone know when the NDA expires so Reviews of the Fury X should start to appear?
Why are the minimums FPS lower with OC?
3,5 hours left if I'm counting right
No, there will be a cut down version on air
Nano will be cut down, but I haven't seen any official confirmation that Air Fury will be cut down (other than WCCFTech who have no source)
lol damn didn't even notice that
In addition to SSAA, nVidia now has SSOC (super-scaling overclocking) LOL j/k
Shit benches are shit
Damm if those VMOD becnhmarks are real, the Fury X is getting crapped on. I hope it aint real, because srsly AMD will go bank rupt, that's terrible performance.