• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

3DMark11 Score

lol @ 3 * 6950's beating quad 590gtx , price to performance AMD is doing really great. Not that synth benches mean much though.
 
Tessellation can be disabled in CCC for all DX11 apps. No AMD benchmarks can be trusted until this gets fixed. Considering it has existed since 11.1, AMD don't seem to care.
 
sadbuttrue said:
Tessellation can be disabled in CCC for all DX11 apps. No AMD benchmarks can be trusted until this gets fixed. Considering it has existed since 11.1, AMD don't seem to care.
Click to expand...

Uh?

If that option is disabled, the score will be extraordinary...

It's pretty obvious when you turn it off..

A single 6950/6970 can easily get P9k+ score when you disable it...
 
SIRTIM3 said:
Why B.S.??? Here is same setup on extreme X6273 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/994610
Click to expand...

It's BS because you are cheating and changing the tessellation levels in the cpanel.
I just ran it again with my CPU @ 4.5ghz, so thats definitely not where you are gaining the massive GPU score.
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1006729

Compare the FPS of the first test of mine to yours and you will see that the FPS is the same because it doesn't use tessellation.

EDIT: I just ran it without tessellation and got this: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1006818

Pretty much exactly the same FPS as you got. There's no need to cheat and lie about your score.
 
Last edited:
My results were achieved on a fresh install of windows 7 and catalyst 11.4. I'm glad you were able to tweak your catalyst settings, but I ran that benchmark to do a quick test of stability and changed nothing but the clocks... besides none of the benchmarks aren't official without using the qualified drivers!!!!! How many posts on here are using qualified drivers???
 
Last edited:
P2256

Clevo P151HM Notebook
Sandy Bridge i7-2720QM
GTX 460M
 
Last edited:
nobody_here said:
Something is way off, I'm scoring 3800 on my system in sig with my card running 850/1800/2000

http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/6803/3d11850mhz.jpg
Click to expand...

You're running a GTX460 he's running a 6870, you can't really compare AMD to Nvidia like that on synthetic benchmarks.
I get 51** with an overclocked GTX470 on an overclocked i7 920 (see first page), now compare that to your overclocked GTX460 on an overclocked Phenom II 955BE and again, seems about right. Take into consideration that you get better results on an i7 than anything on the AMD side (at the moment).
Also, take these benchmarks with a large bucket of salt. hell that guy's 2xGTX590 only got 14***..
 
SonDa5 said:
Socket 775 Intel Q9550 system with GTX470 P5468.

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1008293
Click to expand...

Wow!, not surprised.

Core2Quad @ 4330 MHz
GTX470 @ 900MHz!!/2000MHz!!

That GTX470 has to be under water and not OCCT Error Check stable to achieve those clocks surely, unless its generally a damn good card under a lot of volts. Mines not stable over 755/1800 and is under 75c :(
 
screw OCCT error stable and pumping volts just so it can pass some not real world scenario OCCT simulates
 
Rossi~ said:
What system? The system in your signature? i3 @ 4GHz + and an overclocked 6850 would beat it.
33** seems about right to be honest. An x6 @ 3.5 with a stock 6870
Click to expand...

Really? here is my old system

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/650682

Athlon II x4 3.5, 6850 at 900/1150(I think) same everything else in my sig system. Would think his CPU performance would make the score higher. My overclocked 6850 is at best close to a stock 6870. Something seems off, even just a little.

I must have forgot to save my current system as I only have basic 3dmark11 and I just sold my 6850 yesterday so I can't repost, but his scores are kind of surprising.
 
Last edited:
Rossi~ said:
Wow!, not surprised.

Core2Quad @ 4330 MHz
GTX470 @ 900MHz!!/2000MHz!!

That GTX470 has to be under water and not OCCT Error Check stable to achieve those clocks surely, unless its generally a damn good card under a lot of volts. Mines not stable over 755/1800 and is under 75c :(
Click to expand...


It's water cooled and is stable at 900mhz. It gets unstable at around 920mhz.
 
It's just that I see most people get ~P4000 with AMD + 6870 and Intel i5/i7 + 6870 ~P4500. That's what I remember anyway. If that is correct something is not right with my system. x6 @ 3.5 + stock 6870(11.4) getting P3387 and same cpu/gpu with 11.2 getting P2557 is low. Maybe I'm wrong. Any ideas?
 
flexcore said:
It's just that I see most people get ~P4000 with AMD + 6870 and Intel i5/i7 + 6870 ~P4500. That's what I remember anyway. If that is correct something is not right with my system. x6 @ 3.5 + stock 6870(11.4) getting P3387 and same cpu/gpu with 11.2 getting P2557 is low. Maybe I'm wrong. Any ideas?
Click to expand...

Got any games with built in benchmarks? How about grabbing Heaven. While 3dmark doesn't matter it can show performance issues that could be related to faulty hardware, drivers or combination of the two.

Tried with 1 stick of memory? Chipset drivers installed? It looks like your CPU is working fine as the score looks about right. The GPU score is low, and the combination score seems low considering your Physics score.

Just rule things out one at a time and you should get it solved. Sounds like the GPU though. You really need to try some games and see if you are getting comparable performance. Maybe your system just hates 3dmark 11. I posted my old system score, and that Athlon II at 3.5 and overclocked 6850 had a higher score with 11.2 I believe.
 
I have the Call of Pripyat benchmark. Would that help tell if I'm getting roughly the performance I should be?

What should I use for setting for that Stalker BM?
 
New Score with 3 x eVGA GTX 580 Black Ops:

P15210.png


http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1036805;jse...lse&isAdmin=false&dm03Results=0&dm05Results=0
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top