I haven't seen any 3DMark11 scores in this forum yet...or maybe I'm just blind. But anyways here is my score
P4178 3DMarks @ Performance Mode
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/10828
P4178 3DMarks @ Performance Mode
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/10828
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
3DMark11 Score
- Thread starter Haiku214
- Start date
WorldExclusive
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 11,538
Single GTX 480: P6530
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/9004?show_ads=true&page=/3dm11/9004?key=fKyeCCaJHwtM0Lyb4ahf2kpjxryT2m
Updated:
P7203 - SIngle GTX 570
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1359589;jse...11/1359589?key=fyudCSu76a4tL6fmPeWDLx5m3uLyQH
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/9004?show_ads=true&page=/3dm11/9004?key=fKyeCCaJHwtM0Lyb4ahf2kpjxryT2m
Updated:
P7203 - SIngle GTX 570
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1359589;jse...11/1359589?key=fyudCSu76a4tL6fmPeWDLx5m3uLyQH
Last edited:
Geforce 460 1GB @ 870/2050
P4049: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/6502
X1318: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/6894
Edit: Hate the new site layout. It's such an annoyance trying to use the compare feature.
P4049: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/6502
X1318: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/6894
Edit: Hate the new site layout. It's such an annoyance trying to use the compare feature.
Last edited:
pandora's box
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2004
- Messages
- 4,831
5850 at 975/1200
piratepress
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2002
- Messages
- 1,665
Looking forward to trying this when I get home tonight. 
LOCO LAPTOP
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- May 4, 2006
- Messages
- 12,301
i7 870 @ 4.2, no HT, GTX460 1gb 880/1100, quadro drivers modified.
P4171
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/33031;jsess...dm11/33031?key=kT2RqesWmb5vc6J6qTep3ScSuNuXcK
P4171
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/33031;jsess...dm11/33031?key=kT2RqesWmb5vc6J6qTep3ScSuNuXcK
looks like my 9550+gtx480 > i7 870+gtx460
and i nearly spend $800 bucks for an i7 system, good that i held off.
sirmonkey1985
[H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 22,376
looks like my 9550+gtx480 > i7 870+gtx460
and i nearly spend $800 bucks for an i7 system, good that i held off.
lol using 3dmark11 as a justification to why you didnt spend 800 dollars for an i7 system. could of thought of a 100 different reasons why not to and 3dmark software is definitely not one of them.
LOCO LAPTOP
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- May 4, 2006
- Messages
- 12,301
highest I seen so far, so yes.
Last edited:
WorldExclusive
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 11,538
http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/872945-top-30-3d-mark-11-scores.html
Seems like it will take two high end cards to break 8000 with a kickass CPU and OC. Maybe a GTX 580 OC to 950+ can break 8000.
The 10000 score was done with a 5970+5870. Almost every person at the top is above 4GHz.
SonDa5
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 7,430
It's all about tesselation. NVIDIA 400+ series gpus do a great job at displaying high tesselation quality.
I noticed this when I went from AMD HD6850 to GTX470. NVIDIA looks much better.
I think the reason why newer NVIDIA cards run slower and hotter than newer AMD video cards is because there is alot more going on with the NVIDIA processing. More load at slower speeds doing more.
Only thing I can think of. When I had the HD6850 I could easily get it to go 1GHZ on the core and with the NVIDIA GTX470 I'm lucky to get 830mhz on the core with stock cooling and the fan at 100%.
Last edited:
SonDa5
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 7,430
How does CPU effect this benchmark score?
I went from 4ghz to 4.2 here is the difference..
4ghz
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/35863
4.2ghz
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/36100
SonDa5
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 7,430
Barely an increase in performance. Looks like this benchmark is more about the GPU performance than CPU performance.
Last edited:
Yeah it didn't seem to matter much..I turned it back to 4ghz and will keep tuning the 5870s and see how that goes..
Is this an overclocked Q9550? This is quite a high score.
another-user
Gawd
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2006
- Messages
- 984
SonDa5
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 7,430
I don't think quite that high. The best overclockers are only to 15,357 so far.
Maybe 12,000 with 3 570's
http://3dmark.com/search?resultTypeId=232&_linkedDisplayAdapters=on&cpuModelId=0&chipsetId=0
SicKlown42012
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,319
I got P4732 with my sig rig. Seems like it where it should be considering I have my CPU's power saving features on.
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/37725
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/37725
SonDa5
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 7,430
The best over clocker single HD5870 with stock cooling Vantage score has been beating by a relatively moderately over clocked GTX570 on stock cooling as well.
single HD5870 Vantage 25,900 @1,150/1,300MHz
http://hwbot.org/community/submissi...tage___performance_radeon_hd_5870_25900_marks
Single GTX570 Vantage 27,987 @900/1150MHz
http://hwbot.org/community/submissi...age___performance_geforce_gtx_570_27987_marks
Based on these results I don't think it will be a problem for 2xGTX570 in SLI to reach 12,000+ in 3DMark11
Sig system #1 @ 3.8ghz:
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/38052
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/38052
I suppose it's possible with heavy overclocks. So far the top person with SLi 480s only has P11166 though there is no way to know the clocks. I'm guessing they are very high as there are other guys over at EVGA forums who are getting about 9,000 with SLI 480s.
There is also a guy with 3x 470s overclocked and he is getting just shy of 10,000.
Thats pretty good considering my crossfire setup gets around 30000 with Vantage..
http://3dmark.com/3dmv/2781370
my e-penis is smalll apparently...
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/38694
I'm a little disappointed to have one of the lowest scores in this thread and a quite capable (and recently built computer).
I7-920 overclocked to 4.0ghz
EVGA X58
Galaxy GTX460 1GB Super O/Ced edition
12GB DDR3 RAM
OCZ Vertex 2
.......I don't even break 4K. (3850) Do my scores look low?
I guess I shouldn't care because I don't have a SINGLE game that I can't run at max settings...at perfectly playable framerates (that I've tried anyway)
EDIT - 4/20/2011
I upgraded to a GTX 560 ti and now my score is 4419 (unoptimized - no overclock on the graphics card, no driver optimizations, no trickery, I didn't even close open programs - just ran it.)
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/38694
I'm a little disappointed to have one of the lowest scores in this thread and a quite capable (and recently built computer).
I7-920 overclocked to 4.0ghz
EVGA X58
Galaxy GTX460 1GB Super O/Ced edition
12GB DDR3 RAM
OCZ Vertex 2
.......I don't even break 4K. (3850) Do my scores look low?
I guess I shouldn't care because I don't have a SINGLE game that I can't run at max settings...at perfectly playable framerates (that I've tried anyway)
EDIT - 4/20/2011
I upgraded to a GTX 560 ti and now my score is 4419 (unoptimized - no overclock on the graphics card, no driver optimizations, no trickery, I didn't even close open programs - just ran it.)
Last edited:
That is the average 3DMark 11 GPU score on most gtx460 I've seen. So yours is normal.
SonDa5
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 7,430
I'd like to run a test on my GTX470 but right now my Windows 7 is down. Waiting for SSDs for fresh W7 install.
DogsofJune
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2008
- Messages
- 4,388
I feel better now. We have pretty close systems.
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/39103
I too have no issues playing anything as yet either. Wish sli would work.