BoogerBomb
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2003
- Messages
- 6,470
C4rniV0r said:<shakes internet dick>
You joining in with Nvidia regarding their press release about their dual video cards being better than one?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
C4rniV0r said:<shakes internet dick>
BoogerBomb said:You joining in with Nvidia regarding their press release about their dual video cards being better than one?
S_Z said:GI is not part of "SM2.0b". GI is a SM3.0 (VS3.0) feature, ATI use a "hack" to get it to work on thier cards. Anyway 3DMark05 does not even use GI.
TheRapture said:4567 here with the rig n my sig...and a screene to go with it...
Main Test Results:
3DMark Score 4547 3DMarks
CPU Score 3858 CPUMarks
compare: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=15715
![]()
SnakEyez187 said:Jeez it's not a hack, if Microsoft hadn't lumped it arbitrarily with the SM3.0 spec, then the way ATI does it would be the standard way of doing it
Didnt you see my "". I said hack because its not the way microsoft would like you to access it.SnakEyez187 said:Jeez it's not a hack, if Microsoft hadn't lumped it arbitrarily with the SM3.0 spec, then the way ATI does it would be the standard way of doing it
from the look of the benchmarks, your computer is slower than faster computers and faster than slower computers. that's right, and that is what the benchmark is for..V0ltage said:wow..... runs like complete garbage, got 2,153.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=7090
such a completely useless benchmark.
you need a DX9 card...KarateBob said:tried to run it on my Duron 1.8GHz + GeForce3 Ti 500 comp.....
IDirect3DDevice9::CreatePixelShader failed: Invalid call (D3DERR_INVALIDCALL)
can't even run the CPU tests =\
Oh well, at least it can play ut2k4, that's what really matters.
UberL33tjarad said:from the look of the benchmarks, your computer is slower than faster computers and faster than slower computers. that's right, and that is what the benchmark is for..
with PS2.0 and i think VS1.1 (prolly VS2.0) support.bobsaget said:you need a DX9 card...
JoeP? if it is, i'm assuming your 8500le is getting a nice round score of 0. get a couble of those and throw a whole number infront, and you have yourself a decent score!joecuddles said:Ahahaha, it's jarad! I'd be sad too if I only got 2K
i have a cpu score higher than most ppl's.joecuddles said:Ahahaha, it's jarad! I'd be sad too if I only got 2K
UberL33tjarad said:JoeP? if it is, i'm assuming your 8500le is getting a nice round score of 0. get a couble of those and throw a whole number infront, and you have yourself a decent score!
i got a shitload of money coming for my bday, plus i go $4k for graduation. gonna get an x800pro, and then sell that for the R500 in Q1 2005.
i have a cpu score higher than most ppl's.
UberL33tjarad said:JoeP? if it is, i'm assuming your 8500le is getting a nice round score of 0. get a couble of those and throw a whole number infront, and you have yourself a decent score!
UberL33tjarad said:i got a shitload of money coming for my bday, plus i go $4k for graduation. gonna get an x800pro, and then sell that for the R500 in Q1 2005.
i have a cpu score higher than most ppl's.
bobsaget said:you need a DX9 card...
vanilla pro? i didn't realize there was a vanilla pro. just pro, xt, xt pe. yes, i would be getting the vivo. maybe even two.The Batman said:Why would you get an X800 Pro over a GT. A Vivo I can understand if you're going to flash it, but a the vanilla Pro? Thing get's bitch-slapped by the GT.
UberL33tjarad said:vanilla pro? i didn't realize there was a vanilla pro. just pro, xt, xt pe. yes, i would be getting the vivo. maybe even two.
i didn't know non-vivo cards were considered "vanilla" x800pro's, and that not knowing that tidbit made you sound like a semantic bitcher.The Batman said:Stop with the semantic bitching. You know what I meant with vanilla. I'll call it the non-VIVO from now on okay.
UberL33tjarad said:i didn't know non-vivo cards were considered "vanilla" x800pro's, and that not knowing that tidbit made you sound like a semantic bitcher.
rancor said:Christ both ya guys sound like you were marriedArgue over the most pointless things
it's not my fault i leave the toilet seat up!rancor said:Christ both ya guys sound like you were marriedArgue over the most pointless things
UberL33tjarad said:it's not my fault i leave the toilet seat up!
The Batman said:I'll castrate myself and join a nunnery first.
And since we're on the topic of semantics, semantic bitcher makes no sense.![]()
The Batman said:Why would you get an X800 Pro over a GT. A Vivo I can understand if you're going to flash it, but the vanilla Pro? Thing get's bitch-slapped by the GT.
AMD T-type said:No Vivo here, still beat your score without the "fix", and no flash
I can see where you're coming from though, you only like benchmarks when your card can beat an ATI, makes sense![]()
and back to the 3dMark '05 discussionrancor said:? sorry, but the GT wastes the pro in all game benchmarks also well noted with aa AND af.
Synthetic benchmarks who cares, your card/system might have less running in the background, my gt system only gets 4434 but I have tons of shit in the background.
S_Z said:rancor: sireric confirms that there are some other performance enhancements in the beta driver but the main thing is the mem bug fix.
phaelinx said:not using a dx9 card?
Spiff1333 said:System in sig, 6800gt