• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

3DMark 2005 released!

BoogerBomb said:
You joining in with Nvidia regarding their press release about their dual video cards being better than one?

No, I play games rather than worthless benchmarks :rolleyes:
 
S_Z said:
GI is not part of "SM2.0b". GI is a SM3.0 (VS3.0) feature, ATI use a "hack" to get it to work on thier cards. Anyway 3DMark05 does not even use GI.

Jeez it's not a hack, if Microsoft hadn't lumped it arbitrarily with the SM3.0 spec, then the way ATI does it would be the standard way of doing it
 
TheRapture said:
4567 here with the rig n my sig...and a screene to go with it...

Main Test Results:
3DMark Score 4547 3DMarks
CPU Score 3858 CPUMarks


compare: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=15715

3dm05.jpg







His.
 
That's very low. I get almost a 1000 more at the same settings. And I've got a stock A64 3200+.
 
SnakEyez187 said:
Jeez it's not a hack, if Microsoft hadn't lumped it arbitrarily with the SM3.0 spec, then the way ATI does it would be the standard way of doing it

Kinda like Microsoft decided for fp24 instead of fp32 in the final DX9 specs?
 
SnakEyez187 said:
Jeez it's not a hack, if Microsoft hadn't lumped it arbitrarily with the SM3.0 spec, then the way ATI does it would be the standard way of doing it
Didnt you see my "". I said hack because its not the way microsoft would like you to access it.
 
2400+ @ 2.34 ghz (11.5 x 203)

512 mb 3200 @ 5-2-3-3.0 (single channel for the moment)

Radeon 9700 Pro @ 366 core - 357 memory

Abit AN7 with 17 bios tweaked

Ati beta's just released yesterday

Windows XP Pro SP2

Around 2489 I think.
 
tried to run it on my Duron 1.8GHz + GeForce3 Ti 500 comp.....
IDirect3DDevice9::CreatePixelShader failed: Invalid call (D3DERR_INVALIDCALL)
can't even run the CPU tests =\

Oh well, at least it can play ut2k4, that's what really matters.
 
KarateBob said:
tried to run it on my Duron 1.8GHz + GeForce3 Ti 500 comp.....
IDirect3DDevice9::CreatePixelShader failed: Invalid call (D3DERR_INVALIDCALL)
can't even run the CPU tests =\

Oh well, at least it can play ut2k4, that's what really matters.
you need a DX9 card...
 
UberL33tjarad said:
from the look of the benchmarks, your computer is slower than faster computers and faster than slower computers. that's right, and that is what the benchmark is for..

Ahahaha, it's jarad! I'd be sad too if I only got 2K
 
joecuddles said:
Ahahaha, it's jarad! I'd be sad too if I only got 2K
JoeP? if it is, i'm assuming your 8500le is getting a nice round score of 0. get a couble of those and throw a whole number infront, and you have yourself a decent score!

i got a shitload of money coming for my bday, plus i go $4k for graduation. gonna get an x800pro, and then sell that for the R500 in Q1 2005.

joecuddles said:
Ahahaha, it's jarad! I'd be sad too if I only got 2K
i have a cpu score higher than most ppl's.
 
UberL33tjarad said:
JoeP? if it is, i'm assuming your 8500le is getting a nice round score of 0. get a couble of those and throw a whole number infront, and you have yourself a decent score!

i got a shitload of money coming for my bday, plus i go $4k for graduation. gonna get an x800pro, and then sell that for the R500 in Q1 2005.


i have a cpu score higher than most ppl's.

Why would you get an X800 Pro over a GT. A Vivo I can understand if you're going to flash it, but the vanilla Pro? Thing get's bitch-slapped by the GT.
 
UberL33tjarad said:
JoeP? if it is, i'm assuming your 8500le is getting a nice round score of 0. get a couble of those and throw a whole number infront, and you have yourself a decent score!

I actually am running a 7200 series right now, 32 MB PCI Radeon goodness babeh. 0 score for 3DMark03 and 05! And it's cuddles, from eqii.com, not JoeP, foo.

UberL33tjarad said:
i got a shitload of money coming for my bday, plus i go $4k for graduation. gonna get an x800pro, and then sell that for the R500 in Q1 2005.

i have a cpu score higher than most ppl's.

... k? Did I threaten your e-peen without knowing it?
 
The Batman said:
Why would you get an X800 Pro over a GT. A Vivo I can understand if you're going to flash it, but a the vanilla Pro? Thing get's bitch-slapped by the GT.
vanilla pro? i didn't realize there was a vanilla pro. just pro, xt, xt pe. yes, i would be getting the vivo. maybe even two.
 
UberL33tjarad said:
vanilla pro? i didn't realize there was a vanilla pro. just pro, xt, xt pe. yes, i would be getting the vivo. maybe even two.

Stop with the semantic bitching. You know what I meant with vanilla. I'll call it the non-VIVO from now on okay.
 
The Batman said:
Stop with the semantic bitching. You know what I meant with vanilla. I'll call it the non-VIVO from now on okay.
i didn't know non-vivo cards were considered "vanilla" x800pro's, and that not knowing that tidbit made you sound like a semantic bitcher.
 
UberL33tjarad said:
i didn't know non-vivo cards were considered "vanilla" x800pro's, and that not knowing that tidbit made you sound like a semantic bitcher.


Christ both ya guys sound like you were married :D Argue over the most pointless things
 
rancor said:
Christ both ya guys sound like you were married :D Argue over the most pointless things

I'll castrate myself and join a nunnery first. :D

And since we're on the topic of semantics, semantic bitcher makes no sense. :p
 
UberL33tjarad said:
it's not my fault i leave the toilet seat up!


LOL ;) I hate it when that happens

It doesn't really matter Batman was talking about a regular non vivo pro. lets go on...
 
The Batman said:
I'll castrate myself and join a nunnery first. :D

And since we're on the topic of semantics, semantic bitcher makes no sense. :p

HEHE ouch :eek:
 
The Batman said:
Why would you get an X800 Pro over a GT. A Vivo I can understand if you're going to flash it, but the vanilla Pro? Thing get's bitch-slapped by the GT.

No Vivo here, still beat your score without the "fix", and no flash

I can see where you're coming from though, you only like benchmarks when your card can beat an ATI, makes sense :rolleyes:
 
AMD T-type said:
No Vivo here, still beat your score without the "fix", and no flash

I can see where you're coming from though, you only like benchmarks when your card can beat an ATI, makes sense :rolleyes:


? sorry, but the GT wastes the pro in all game benchmarks also well noted with aa AND af.

Synthetic benchmarks who cares, your card/system might have less running in the background, my gt system only gets 4434 but I have tons of shit in the background.
 
rancor: sireric confirms that there are some other performance enhancements in the beta driver but the main thing is the mem bug fix.
 
rancor said:
? sorry, but the GT wastes the pro in all game benchmarks also well noted with aa AND af.

Synthetic benchmarks who cares, your card/system might have less running in the background, my gt system only gets 4434 but I have tons of shit in the background.
and back to the 3dMark '05 discussion
 
S_Z said:
rancor: sireric confirms that there are some other performance enhancements in the beta driver but the main thing is the mem bug fix.


Ah cool thx for the heads up :) Just didn't make sense to me that much of a difference from the pci -e and agp and the agp being faster lol.
 
i think its been fixed..i have it and absolutely no problems, i dont have an a64 cpu but all those programs that said wouldnt work with it..work fine =/ i think through small updates they've fixed it
 
Vanilla x800 pro, no volt mod, no pipe mod, 12 pipes, 585/575 on a AMD 64 3200+ @ 2.4ghz = 5,592, that rapes the GT no? x800 pro basicly ties the GT in far cry btw, and the x800 pro beats the 6800 ultra in UT2004. Also with the 8.07 drivers that fixed the memory allocation bug with the 256MB cards didn't just up my 3dmarks, I went from 58.0FPS @ 1280*1024 doom 3 time demo, to 66.4 FPS, thats quite the increase, and in the 4.10's with AI, it has a better lookup code which will put it closer to around 75-80FPS, not bad no?
 
Back
Top