me: i been using vista from the beggining, first it was full of problems, finally i couldn't install sp1, lol so i bought a new copy with sp1 already installed. and it is finally working. what do i expect? total perfection. i want an operating system with no problems at all. i expect that from...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817171022&nm_mc=OTC-C173T&cm_mmc=OTC-C173T-_-Power+Supplies-_-Cooler+Master-_-17171022
is this a good psu?:confused::)
shouldn't the new PhysX processor be available only in the new 260/280 gtx cards?! why are they saying, that it is, in the "old" 9800s also? that's strange!
vista is working fine now (after a lot of doing). but sometimes i get a black screen for 1 sec and everything returns to normal, and i get a message saying my video card stopped responding... what does that mean? does anyone get any similar message??
i will always prefer desktops, down with notebooks. they are small and hard to upgrade and more expensive to replace parts.
have you guys heard, they say people are buying more notebooks than desktops. what do you guys prefer, notebook or desktop?
what do you guys think, anybody have gone from vista x64 to xp 64? it seems like a logical thing to do since vista x64 still have bugs. at least i can address my 8gb of ram. would you or have you done it?
i just bought a legal copy of crysis. did you guys know about what piracy is doing to the makers of this game?! shame. and my question is, if it's easy to obtain a illegal copy of this game online, how come they just take the illegal sites off the internet (put them down) ??
isn't ddr memory fast enough already, why do we need faster than what we already have? and i think the same about processors. maybe gpus need to be faster but memory? and cpus?
i have the d975xbx mobo (1st version). and i think that this mobo is the reason why vista 64bit won't run stable in my system when i try using windows update application. do you have this mobo and are you running vista 64 at same time?
would you buy this dell:
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Monitors/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-6272
or this samsung:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001264
and can you say why?
this is not a new vista thing, xp too was like this. while copying files from one folder to another windows takes to long. why is that? it was so easy in dos.
so many people in the forum and computer magazines, people waiting for windows 7, some using xp again and buying xp 64bit. what do you guys personally each one think of vista, is it here to stay or has it failed?
why is that in windows, icons and wallpapers and gadgets look so ugly. and on the macs they are so pretty. is it because apple works harder in making them or is it because of some windows, technical, limitations??
i run "sfc /scannow" and got this message, "verification 100% complete. windows resource protection found corrupt files but was unable to fix some of them."
how do i fix this?