Let the 6970 Rumors Begin

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am holding a 6970 in my hands as we speak, However, NDA says I cannot tell anything of this for about another week.

Will leak information to the highest bidder :p

Not as impressive as the GTX 595 I have in my hands :D
 
The nefarious schemer in me says that, if I'm AMD, and I have a soon-to-be-launched card that outperforms the competitor's just released products, I'd be leaking that information to spoil their launch. So is AMD just not nefarious enough, or are they not in a spoiling position?
 
The nefarious schemer in me says that, if I'm AMD, and I have a soon-to-be-launched card that outperforms the competitor's just released products, I'd be leaking that information to spoil their launch. So is AMD just not nefarious enough, or are they not in a spoiling position?

Or they just haven't done that since the HD4800 came out and spoiled nVidia's recently launched GTX200 party?
 
Don't be surprised if this "news article" disappears too. I still laugh when I see articles saying the 68xx would be "slow."
 
Where it goes nuts is that 6870 has 5D shaders.

6870 1120 5D shaders = 224 Shader Blocks
5850 1440 5D shaders = 288 Shader Blocks

And they perform similar.

If the new 4D shader performs equal to the 5D shader in 6870s, then
480/224 = 214% or a 114% performance boost over 6870s, and 1 6870 = 70% of a 580, so 2x is 140% of a 580.


You are forgetting the frequency of the chip ;) Lets say for argument sake the new hd 6970 has the same frequency of the hd 5870.

Lets see rumors put the 6970 with 480 4d units, each 4d unit performs like a 5d unit of the hd5870 (which is what AMD stated), the hd 5870 has 320 5d units.

160 more units will be a maximum of 50% performance increase, that is if the chip isn't bottlenecked anywhere else.
 
The name of the site is FUDZilla and you guys are complaining about the FUD on it.
 
Whats interesting from the hardware.fr quote is that he's basically hinting the 570 can have its price adjusted if 350 seems too high

Here's Fud, saying it'll be slower.......Again.

http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21113-cayman-radeon-hd-6970-and-6950-launch-december-15th

But, at this point, who's really surprised by his shenanigans?

I love how he writes that the 580 was faster than expected. You mean, a card who's specs were laid out a year ago that AMD expected?
 
The name of the site is FUDZilla and you guys are complaining about the FUD on it.

Complaining? I'm not complaining. I am, however, mocking Fuad's silliness.

I love how he writes that the 580 was faster than expected. You mean, a card who's specs were laid out a year ago that AMD expected?

Yeah, 15-20% faster. AMD must have been devastated.......*cough*
 
The nefarious schemer in me says that, if I'm AMD, and I have a soon-to-be-launched card that outperforms the competitor's just released products, I'd be leaking that information to spoil their launch. So is AMD just not nefarious enough, or are they not in a spoiling position?

They're a large profit-seeking corporation, so the former is out. :D
 
Well, if AMD pulls another "suprise, bitch!," expect the 570 and 580 to drop in price. The 580 might actually come down to the $400 range.
 
I'm betting money on the leaks I have read about, claiming 20-40% speed improves when compared to a 580.

Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have a 6870 which is performing at the same speed of my former 5870, albeit, I am not 100% convinced the image quality is the same, I have left that topic in another thread and I am not 100% convinced I am right either, its subjective, like the fact I have 2TB of lossless music, of most poorly recorded black metal that you can't tell is Lossless VS Lame VBR anyway...

However, I will say this, If 6870 can be the same speed as 5870 in most everything, except maybe 1-3 frames per second slower, or break even when OC to 1000MHZ on default stock voltage, I am BETTING not only will the 6970 be overclockable by 100MHZ, I am going to suggest that its faster than the 580 simply because it is a refresh and final optimization on the chip which brought us the 5870, And that was a revolutionary card. I know myself I have spent hours trying to find reliable leaked rumor information but there is no such thing. I have this card preordered, and I was in fact joking about actually having one to begin with.

However, the reasons for owning one now for me are less important - I sold the 27" Apple Cinema LED Display I had been saving to buy for sometime due to Color Uniform issues which were unacceptable to me, bought a Dell U2711 instead, which also doesn't have dust behind the GLASS. :p

Sooooo, Mini Displayport is not such a big deal but was one of the WTF's about the 580, Why doesn't it have the newest displayport? *Shrugs* anyway, This ATI Card better be worth the wait and hopefully better be out on 15th or 17th otherwise my return warranty for store credit is no longer valid and I am forced to sell on the street my 6870, So ATI, if you are reading this, (er: AMD), please hurry the FEH up.
 
Really? cuz if they had a heap load of 58xx cards that are still selling, then releasing now would make them take a loss on the 58xx cards :p

True, a write down of surplus inventory would be costly. But AMD wasn't really pricing them aggressively after the 580 launch so hard to know what is up.
 
What is happening? There seem to be some reservations in the 570 reviews pointing towards the release of the 6900 series. AMD was supposed to give reviewers a little more time with the 6900 then the week they got with the 6800 series. If the launch is the 15th, they should have the cards already:

Hardocp 570 review said:
It will be interesting to see if we have another award winning GPU next week that could make us rethink our comments today, but we cannot comment on what we have not gamed with.
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/12/07/nvidia_geforce_gtx_570_video_card_review/10

Anandtech 570 review said:
And finally, that brings us to AMD. AMD’s schedule calls for the Radeon HD 6900 series to be launched by the end of the year, and the year is quickly running out. There’s still too much uncertainty to advise holding off on any GTX 500 series purchases (particularly if you expect to have a card for Christmas), but if you’re not in a rush for a card it could be worth waiting a couple more weeks to see what AMD has up their sleeves. A holiday slugfest between AMD and NVIDIA and the resulting price drops are certainly at the top of our wish lists.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4051/nvidias-geforce-gtx-570-filling-in-the-gaps/16

Techreport 570 review said:
You can get higher performance for just a little more money out of a pair of Radeon HD 6850s in CrossFireX, and I suppose that's AMD's closest competing product offering right now. But again, the foibles of multi-GPU configs will be in play, as will the stark fact of looming obsolescence with the Radeon HD 6900 series imminent. We said a week ago that we wouldn't pull the trigger on a pair of 6850s right now, and we remain in that holding pattern.
http://techreport.com/articles.x/20088/14

Alienbabeltech 570 review said:
Cons:
Price and uncertainty about AMD’s Cayman. The market will decide.
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=22392&page=29

Guru3D 570 review said:
Comparing it to its bigger brother we noticed that on average you'll spot a 20% performance differential in-between the GTX 570 and GTX 580. Next to that, there is one other thing you do need to take into account, AMD is about to release their Radeon HD 6900 series graphics cards. Knowing AMD, they will match or surpass performance with an hopefully an aggressive price, and that might bring some more balance and or confusion into the pricing. Though admittedly, the GTX 570 is priced quite fair.
http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-570-review/21

etc.

Normally, one shouldn't put too much into this, but if AMD did give reviewers a bit more time (then a week like last time), a launch date at 15th should mean they already have the cards...

Edit: And here's from Nordic:

AMD Radeon HD 6900 series pictured, launches Dec 15
full.png

http://www.nordichardware.com/news/...hd-6900-series-pictured-launches-dec-15-.html
 
Hopefully, AMD repeats what they did with 5870, which surpassed the gtx 285 by almost 25%, and the 5850, which surpassed the 275 by around 12-15%. Though it's only a marginal difference in terms of memory, the 6950 might be slower than the 570.
 
Hopefully, AMD repeats what they did with 5870, which surpassed the gtx 285 by almost 25%, and the 5850, which surpassed the 275 by around 12-15%. Though it's only a marginal difference in terms of memory, the 6950 might be slower than the 570.

6900 series is a new architecture, so all bets are off. As mentioned earlier in this thread, Nvidia went 7800 gtx to 8800 gtx on the same process, but with different architecture. AMD CAN pull another RV300 out of their hats where both the 6950 and the 6970 beats the 580, or they can have a 6950 fighting the 570 and a 6970 fighting the 580. Due to the product positioning slides and similar, I doubt it will be anything less.

AMD is just as silent about it as Nvidia was around launch of 8800GTX, so its going to be fun next week. :D
 
It'll be interesting to see because from those leaked Cayman slides, Cayman is the largest change in architecture since R600, so it'll be very interesting to see which direction AMD is heading with their GPUs
 
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?
 
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?

You mean Nordic? The stuff they posted is just bullshit.


Like how the HD6850 only has 800 SP.

And how the HD6870 only has 960SP.


Little fake leak slipup, eh?
 
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?


Nah, not really. The 470 has 1.2 gb of memory, and was wrestling with the 6870. The 5830 has 1gb, yet struggled against the 768mb.

Regardless, the full specs still revolve around speculation.
 
Edit: And here's from Nordic:

AMD Radeon HD 6900 series pictured, launches Dec 15
full.png

http://www.nordichardware.com/news/...hd-6900-series-pictured-launches-dec-15-.html

FAKE this shit has been fake since the moment some crap Chinese website desperate for clicks posted it. Look at the freaking picture of the card. Read the number of the card on the heat sink shroud, it says 6870. Their reasoning is also way off. Barts is pin compatible with Cypress not with Cayman. Also the chart is fake, they don't even have the right specs for Barts...

If a sound byte was attached to that article it would have to be when Elaine told Jerry she faked her orgasms all the time.
JERRY: What about the breathing, the panting, the moaning, the screaming?
ELAINE: Fake, fake, fake, fake.
 
Last edited:
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?

Yes Me! I'm also disappointed the GTX 570 only has 1.2GB that's because I'll be doing surround with the 3 Asus 23 inch 120hz monitors I have here now. I was hoping to be able to get 3 6950s or 3 570s and watercool those to use for a year and change until Kepler and 8900 series come out, Not likely now. Looks like 2 GTX 580s or 2 6970s. I need the prices to come down a bit though. With the blocks I need to get they'll cost me alot of money, more than I wanted to spend for only 2 cards. :(
 
FAKE this shit has been fake since the moment some crap Chinese website desperate for clicks posted it. Look at the freaking picture of the card. Read the number of the card on the heat sink shroud. Also the chart is fake, they don't even have the right specs for Barts...

lol, they couldn't even properly post fake specs...

shame.
 
FAKE this shit has been fake since the moment some crap Chinese website desperate for clicks posted it. Look at the freaking picture of the card. Read the number of the card on the heat sink shroud. Also the chart is fake, they don't even have the right specs for Barts...

LOL! Thats true. I was too busy checking the specs for Cayman to see if the Barts were correct. :p Its a shame though. Nordichardware have been a bit more cautious and checked this before. Seems like every site is jumping to get the rumors out first without checking.
 
Yes Me! I'm also disappointed the GTX 570 only has 1.2GB that's because I'll be doing surround with the 3 Asus 23 inch 120hz monitors I have here now. I was hoping to be able to get 3 6950s or 3 570s and watercool those to use for a year and change until Kepler and 8900 series come out, Not likely now. Looks like 2 GTX 580s or 2 6970s. I need the prices to come down a bit though. With the blocks I need to get they'll cost me alot of money, more than I wanted to spend for only 2 cards. :(
Would MCW60/MCW80 with the passive sinks be adequate? Or do they just don't cut it anymore? (they are kinda ugly past 1 GPU...)
 
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?

Not really, my reasoning is that the people that spend 1000$ plus on monitor setups are the only ones that need the 2GB memory buffer, and they will pay half that for a video card. It takes 2560x1600 or 1920x1080 in 2 x Eyefinity minimum to benefit from more than 1GB of memory.

The ones shopping for a bargain are more likely to run 24in 1920x1080, and for that 1GB is MORE than enough. Leaving out unneeded memory = lower power and cheaper cost.

Edit. I take this back, it will hurt them in high resolution benchmarks, and that matters more right? :D
 
Last edited:
FAKE this shit has been fake since the moment some crap Chinese website desperate for clicks posted it. Look at the freaking picture of the card. Read the number of the card on the heat sink shroud, it says 6870. Their reasoning is also way off. Barts is pin compatible with Cypress not with Cayman. Also the chart is fake, they don't even have the right specs for Barts...

If a sound byte was attached to that article it would have to be when Elaine told Jerry she faked her orgasms all the time.

Thank god!!! there is still hope, cmon 6950!!
 
Would MCW60/MCW80 with the passive sinks be adequate? Or do they just don't cut it anymore? (they are kinda ugly past 1 GPU...)

Those are good but I'm looking for a full block not a gpu only block because of the ugly beyond 1GPU part. Even the one with the heatsinks look bad LOL
 
This is a really interesting launch. I can't remember the last time there was a such a hold on information. From the sound of things reviewers are still in the dark as much as we are.
 
Arrgh, I really need to know pricing of these things. I've seen rumors of $449 for the 6970 and $349 for the 6950 both 2GB with a possible $299 1GB 6950 later down the road.
I set my budget for a pair of $500 cards with a couple hundred extra in case they go up in price but I also want to get a couple of u2410s for some Eyefinity action. I've been waiting since the 5870 launched with this 4870 512MB because I wanted to see what Fermi would bring and we all know what happened. 5870 prices went up and by that time the boards with voltage control were all gone. The GTX570 looks pretty tempting at the moment but I've waited over a year and I'm not going to buy on impulse.
 
LOL! Thats true. I was too busy checking the specs for Cayman to see if the Barts were correct. :p Its a shame though. Nordichardware have been a bit more cautious and checked this before. Seems like every site is jumping to get the rumors out first without checking.

Same here. Apparently I can't read. :p
 
Here's what Gibbo at Overclockers UK said when asked about stock of HD69** and if he would stack the cards in a pyramid for a photo.

Looks like we will see a hard launch by AMD soon™. ;)

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=17954123&postcount=521
If I was to build a pyramid this time well the pyramid would be larger than OcUK's offices haha, let me just say I have a lot.

Performance wise well for the money no one will be dissapointed.
 
Yes Me! I'm also disappointed the GTX 570 only has 1.2GB that's because I'll be doing surround with the 3 Asus 23 inch 120hz monitors I have here now. I was hoping to be able to get 3 6950s or 3 570s and watercool those to use for a year and change until Kepler and 8900 series come out, Not likely now. Looks like 2 GTX 580s or 2 6970s. I need the prices to come down a bit though. With the blocks I need to get they'll cost me alot of money, more than I wanted to spend for only 2 cards. :(
I don't need a time machine to know that Lord_Exodia is going to end up buying green.
You know it, we know it, everybody knows it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top