^^ Someone gets it
I am holding a 6970 in my hands as we speak, However, NDA says I cannot tell anything of this for about another week.
Will leak information to the highest bidder
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^^ Someone gets it
I am holding a 6970 in my hands as we speak, However, NDA says I cannot tell anything of this for about another week.
Will leak information to the highest bidder
Not as impressive as the GTX 595 I have in my hands
I am holding a 6970 in my hands as we speak, However, NDA says I cannot tell anything of this for about another week.
Will leak information to the highest bidder
The nefarious schemer in me says that, if I'm AMD, and I have a soon-to-be-launched card that outperforms the competitor's just released products, I'd be leaking that information to spoil their launch. So is AMD just not nefarious enough, or are they not in a spoiling position?
Here's Fud, saying it'll be slower.......Again.
http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21113-cayman-radeon-hd-6970-and-6950-launch-december-15th
But, at this point, who's really surprised by his shenanigans?
Where it goes nuts is that 6870 has 5D shaders.
6870 1120 5D shaders = 224 Shader Blocks
5850 1440 5D shaders = 288 Shader Blocks
And they perform similar.
If the new 4D shader performs equal to the 5D shader in 6870s, then
480/224 = 214% or a 114% performance boost over 6870s, and 1 6870 = 70% of a 580, so 2x is 140% of a 580.
Here's Fud, saying it'll be slower.......Again.
http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21113-cayman-radeon-hd-6970-and-6950-launch-december-15th
But, at this point, who's really surprised by his shenanigans?
The name of the site is FUDZilla and you guys are complaining about the FUD on it.
I love how he writes that the 580 was faster than expected. You mean, a card who's specs were laid out a year ago that AMD expected?
The nefarious schemer in me says that, if I'm AMD, and I have a soon-to-be-launched card that outperforms the competitor's just released products, I'd be leaking that information to spoil their launch. So is AMD just not nefarious enough, or are they not in a spoiling position?
They're a large profit-seeking corporation, so the former is out.
They're a large profit-seeking corporation, so the former is out.
Thats the conclusion I take from this whole lack of info shill.
Really? cuz if they had a heap load of 58xx cards that are still selling, then releasing now would make them take a loss on the 58xx cards
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/12/07/nvidia_geforce_gtx_570_video_card_review/10Hardocp 570 review said:It will be interesting to see if we have another award winning GPU next week that could make us rethink our comments today, but we cannot comment on what we have not gamed with.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4051/nvidias-geforce-gtx-570-filling-in-the-gaps/16Anandtech 570 review said:And finally, that brings us to AMD. AMD’s schedule calls for the Radeon HD 6900 series to be launched by the end of the year, and the year is quickly running out. There’s still too much uncertainty to advise holding off on any GTX 500 series purchases (particularly if you expect to have a card for Christmas), but if you’re not in a rush for a card it could be worth waiting a couple more weeks to see what AMD has up their sleeves. A holiday slugfest between AMD and NVIDIA and the resulting price drops are certainly at the top of our wish lists.
http://techreport.com/articles.x/20088/14Techreport 570 review said:You can get higher performance for just a little more money out of a pair of Radeon HD 6850s in CrossFireX, and I suppose that's AMD's closest competing product offering right now. But again, the foibles of multi-GPU configs will be in play, as will the stark fact of looming obsolescence with the Radeon HD 6900 series imminent. We said a week ago that we wouldn't pull the trigger on a pair of 6850s right now, and we remain in that holding pattern.
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=22392&page=29Alienbabeltech 570 review said:Cons:
Price and uncertainty about AMD’s Cayman. The market will decide.
http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-570-review/21Guru3D 570 review said:Comparing it to its bigger brother we noticed that on average you'll spot a 20% performance differential in-between the GTX 570 and GTX 580. Next to that, there is one other thing you do need to take into account, AMD is about to release their Radeon HD 6900 series graphics cards. Knowing AMD, they will match or surpass performance with an hopefully an aggressive price, and that might bring some more balance and or confusion into the pricing. Though admittedly, the GTX 570 is priced quite fair.
Hopefully, AMD repeats what they did with 5870, which surpassed the gtx 285 by almost 25%, and the 5850, which surpassed the 275 by around 12-15%. Though it's only a marginal difference in terms of memory, the 6950 might be slower than the 570.
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?
Edit: And here's from Nordic:
AMD Radeon HD 6900 series pictured, launches Dec 15
http://www.nordichardware.com/news/...hd-6900-series-pictured-launches-dec-15-.html
JERRY: What about the breathing, the panting, the moaning, the screaming?
ELAINE: Fake, fake, fake, fake.
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?
FAKE this shit has been fake since the moment some crap Chinese website desperate for clicks posted it. Look at the freaking picture of the card. Read the number of the card on the heat sink shroud. Also the chart is fake, they don't even have the right specs for Barts...
FAKE this shit has been fake since the moment some crap Chinese website desperate for clicks posted it. Look at the freaking picture of the card. Read the number of the card on the heat sink shroud. Also the chart is fake, they don't even have the right specs for Barts...
Would MCW60/MCW80 with the passive sinks be adequate? Or do they just don't cut it anymore? (they are kinda ugly past 1 GPU...)Yes Me! I'm also disappointed the GTX 570 only has 1.2GB that's because I'll be doing surround with the 3 Asus 23 inch 120hz monitors I have here now. I was hoping to be able to get 3 6950s or 3 570s and watercool those to use for a year and change until Kepler and 8900 series come out, Not likely now. Looks like 2 GTX 580s or 2 6970s. I need the prices to come down a bit though. With the blocks I need to get they'll cost me alot of money, more than I wanted to spend for only 2 cards.
Looking at the leaked specs, is anyone else disappointed that the 6950 only has a 1GB memory buffer?
FAKE this shit has been fake since the moment some crap Chinese website desperate for clicks posted it. Look at the freaking picture of the card. Read the number of the card on the heat sink shroud, it says 6870. Their reasoning is also way off. Barts is pin compatible with Cypress not with Cayman. Also the chart is fake, they don't even have the right specs for Barts...
If a sound byte was attached to that article it would have to be when Elaine told Jerry she faked her orgasms all the time.
Would MCW60/MCW80 with the passive sinks be adequate? Or do they just don't cut it anymore? (they are kinda ugly past 1 GPU...)
LOL! Thats true. I was too busy checking the specs for Cayman to see if the Barts were correct. Its a shame though. Nordichardware have been a bit more cautious and checked this before. Seems like every site is jumping to get the rumors out first without checking.
If I was to build a pyramid this time well the pyramid would be larger than OcUK's offices haha, let me just say I have a lot.
Performance wise well for the money no one will be dissapointed.
I don't need a time machine to know that Lord_Exodia is going to end up buying green.Yes Me! I'm also disappointed the GTX 570 only has 1.2GB that's because I'll be doing surround with the 3 Asus 23 inch 120hz monitors I have here now. I was hoping to be able to get 3 6950s or 3 570s and watercool those to use for a year and change until Kepler and 8900 series come out, Not likely now. Looks like 2 GTX 580s or 2 6970s. I need the prices to come down a bit though. With the blocks I need to get they'll cost me alot of money, more than I wanted to spend for only 2 cards.