Auer
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2018
- Messages
- 1,972
https://twitter.com/RyanSmithAT/status/1301993263835086849
Nvidia Ampere GeForce RTX 30 series has SR-IOV support
Nvidia Ampere GeForce RTX 30 series has SR-IOV support
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://twitter.com/RyanSmithAT/status/1301993263835086849
Nvidia Ampere GeForce RTX 30 series has SR-IOV support
Nice find.Haven't seen this mentioned anywhere else, but it appears there is going to be an XC3 Black model as well. Seems to be on the smaller side of cards, roughly the FE's size.
https://forums.evga.com/m/tm.aspx?m=3072847&p=31
Waiting for Big Navi to come is up to whether you need to upgrade now or can wait several months for a product and stock to materialize. A 3070 with claimed performance will be great, it's up to AMD to present something which will make nvidia's products easier to pass on. Right now though? Sure is a lot of silence going around on team red...
I read on some forum that availabilty of RTX 3090 will be so low ,that chances i will get new card is new year. Trust that opinion?
Dis-information. FUD. Not lies, but not the whole story.Part of the reason we don't see Big Navi leaks, is because AMD doesn't work with AIBs until just about he reveal. According to Igor, they are only getting BOM now, and he expect there will be NO Big Navi AIB cards this year. Or maybe a couple of rush jobs in time for Xmas.
So, it back to AMD reference cooler for anyone that Wants Big Navi this year, and AMD doesn't exactly have a history good references cooler design.
The AIB part starts at 15:10min He says the AIBs do not yet have a bill of material for the Big Navi cards. It takes roughly 3 month from the bill of material to product on the shelfs so every Big Navi card this year will come directly from AMD. He says if there somehow will be AIB cards this year then these will be rush jobs and come around christmas.
I changed that last statement as it was incorrect. Please delete or edit your post, so I am not a source of FUD too.Igor is now untrustworthy?
So which part is FUD?I changed that last statement as it was incorrect. Please delete or edit your post, so I am not a source of FUD too.
I don't think I can explain right now without burning my AIB sources. Let's see how information shifts around this coming week and maybe I can speak more to that.So which part is FUD?
This is a much more complete statement. However I would suggest "rush jobs" is not correct.The AIB part starts at 15:10min He says the AIBs do not yet have a bill of material for the Big Navi cards. It takes roughly 3 month from the bill of material to product on the shelfs so every Big Navi card this year will come directly from AMD. He says if there somehow will be AIB cards this year then these will be rush jobs and come around christmas.
I would think that you could just look at aib cooler design and that by and large they don't varry much generation to generation. They largely just change some of the mounting and design to match the new pcb apart from some halo products.
How hard do people think it is to adapt say, the msi trio from the 1080, to the 2080, and now to the 3080?
Coolers have been being worked on by AIBs for quite a while already.Yet, how long did we wait for AIB 5700XT? Those are bog standard, GPU and VRAM, relatively moderate power GPUs.
This time, they might be HBM, and 300W parts, which will probably take a bit more engineering precision for the cooler over the HBM, and handling the higher power load.
Yet, how long did we wait for AIB 5700XT? Those are bog standard, GPU and VRAM, relatively moderate power GPUs.
This time, they might be HBM, and 300W parts, which will probably take a bit more engineering precision for the cooler over the HBM, and handling the higher power load.
All your posts make you sound like a salesman for nVidia.
I'm sure it'll be fine, some products not withstanding, like hydrocooled 3090's will be sometime 6-9 months late.
I understand how facts can appear biased, to the biased.
This is historically how it has played out in recent history for AMD.
All the initial card sales have been AMD reference designs. That is just a fact.
In the case of both Vega, and Navi (still fresh in my memory), AMD coolers were undesirable, and you had to wait a month or more to get a better AIB design. With lots of people urging that.
The speculative part about why this happens. A reasonable hypothesis is AMD doesn't let AIBs in early to avoid leaks.
NVidia OTOH seems to leak info like a sieve, but it has AIB designs much earlier.
Time will tell if Igor called it correctly. But given AMD recent history, and the lack of AIB leaks, it seems the Vega and Navi board pattern will repeat again.
You whole defense of the FE cooler post comes to mind, no fact, no tests, just bias speculation in favor of nVidia and some very dubious understanding of thermodynamics and airflow.
I love reading you guys. But time now for make coffee. Anyone want a coffee?
Are you qualified to understand engineering, because I highly doubt it. speculation, in favor of nVidia, with no real word data, thats why your post is junk.
Could it work? maybe, but you are completely ignoring the downside to say 'but more air ejected from case!' which is not the case if you have properly designed your cases airflow anyway. My msi trio doesn't leave air recitculating in the case to increase ambient temp, and blowing hot air directly over the cpu and its cooler is very, very likey to have an impact on cpu temp and effeciency.
I get it, your a fan, reality bends to your will and all else is blind (you drink the koolaid and marketing slides). I for one will be wise and a skeptic until real word data is out.
nVidia’s FE design is pure sex. Half the heat exiting the case and the other half aimed at the exhaust? Given they are using quite large fans I am not worried about CPU temps (which generally aren’t even close to max in real world gaming) or noise. Overall it’s way better than the typical AIB design that recirculates air in the case.
Cheaper heatsink design with fan on the back for the same performance.I think it's there for the marketing splash. The fan on the back, is an attention grabber. Put the fan on the front, and it looks like a normal cooler.
Thoughts?
Cheaper heatsink design with fan on the back for the same performance.
How does the fan on the back make it cheaper?
AFAICT, the 3070 FE cooler is a flow through design as well, but with the fan on the front, and presumably it's the cheapest cooler of the FE line shown so far.
It seems like fan in front would require additional heatpipe bends and a stepped heatsink, instead of a solid straight "brick". Not sure if the added complexity reflects on price, but this would be my first guess. Also, airflow direction control could be better this way
We would have to see both heatsinks from the side to draw conclusions. 3080's heatpipes bend before the fan for the PCB components already (but again for the fan so you're right there), and the heatsink fins don't have to be be indented in the front and extended to the rear to keep the same surface area.It seems more likely with the fan in front, they would be flatter than they are on the new FE, as front fan flow through, is just like all the conventional designs with the fans in the front.
Instead for this new FE design, they had to be bent out from the board to make space for the back fan.
In fact there are few of the AIB models with conventional open air heat sinks that are flow though, and all they have to do, is remove back plate in that area, and use a short PCB, on an otherwise conventional design. Like Sapphire has been doing for years:
View attachment 276560
You are helping to make the case that it's more expensive to put the fan in the back.
Most expensive cooler ever produced by nvidia for production cards.Cheaper heatsink design with fan on the back for the same performance.
I get that, no need to make it needlessly more expensive though. Again, maybe it would be a meaningless price difference, which would leave either airflow reasons or marketing cool factor.Most expensive cooler ever produced by nvidia for production cards.
Most expensive cooler ever produced by nvidia for production cards.
I have a feeling these coolers became necessary once they got a idea of where RDNA2 was going to land. Their wattage's scream of a process being pushed to the limit and I have a feeling these will not overclock well.
Not really. Huge package wattages, past experience for the FX coolers, and Nvidia simply has to have FE stand out.I have a feeling these coolers became necessary once they got a idea of where RDNA2 was going to land. Their wattage's scream of a process being pushed to the limit and I have a feeling these will not overclock well.
We have no idea of the overclocking, so not sure what your feeling on an unreleased/untested card is all about. Based on how they are scaling with wattage, i don't see how they wouldn't be good overclockers, plus I saw a leaked slide/vid cap that showed the 3080fe running at 19xx mhz in game. Last gen we were mostly limited by the caps imposed by Nvidia themselves, but look at the presentation for the 2080 release, we have an fe card that could oc pretty well for a launch item. With the massive throughput of all these double cuda cores, even a little overclocking should yield pretty substantial results. Regardless, soon we will all get to see it first hand if lucky enough to score on launch day.I have a feeling these coolers became necessary once they got a idea of where RDNA2 was going to land. Their wattage's scream of a process being pushed to the limit and I have a feeling these will not overclock well.
Could have stopped typing after this.We have no idea of the overclocking