Darth Ender
Gawd
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2018
- Messages
- 543
Unlike processors where going faster has meaningful results ....there is objectively less use out of going faster than needed for graphics... So the market for such cards is extremely small. AMD doesn't have money to make massive investments in things that wont sell volume, especially when they can't deliver all of the things they want at the same time due to money and manufacturing constraints, so strategy and priority will almost always trump aiming for fastest pc title.
I just dont see amd seeking the title of fastest graphics card as high of a priority as getting their gpu's in laptops by improving the power efficiency and maintaining their push into the larger markets of mid-range and low range price points.
They are looking at intel not nvidia.
Nvidia is a temporary player ....as soon as intel gets into the discrete graphics game, it's game over for nvidia since their literal only market will be top end pc graphics and compute cards ...which is unlikely to be able to sustain them. Then they'll get cannibalized by either intel or amd (probably intel unless they file for bankruptcy)
I just dont see amd seeking the title of fastest graphics card as high of a priority as getting their gpu's in laptops by improving the power efficiency and maintaining their push into the larger markets of mid-range and low range price points.
They are looking at intel not nvidia.
Nvidia is a temporary player ....as soon as intel gets into the discrete graphics game, it's game over for nvidia since their literal only market will be top end pc graphics and compute cards ...which is unlikely to be able to sustain them. Then they'll get cannibalized by either intel or amd (probably intel unless they file for bankruptcy)