cageymaru
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Messages
- 22,090
Glad to see that Nvidia cards can run it just fine like I figured from the beginning.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wait...why are you getting like double the performance as your previous benchmark? What'd you change?
EDIT: Just turning DOF down?
How about we get 2 people to bench with the same settings;
A GTX 680 owner and a 7970 owner (stock settings preferably)
Maxed Settings @ 1080P ensuring DOF and TressFX is enabled. There seems to be alot of differences here lol
How about we get 2 people to bench with the same settings;
A GTX 680 owner and a 7970 owner (stock settings preferably)
Maxed Settings @ 1080P ensuring DOF and TressFX is enabled. There seems to be alot of differences here lol
Those of us without VPN's are waiting for the game to come out still.
How about we get 2 people to bench with the same settings;
A GTX 680 owner and a 7970 owner (stock settings preferably)
Maxed Settings @ 1080P ensuring DOF and TressFX is enabled. There seems to be alot of differences here lol
Looks like a stock 7970 has around a 10FPS advantage over a stock GTX 680. Pretty significant.
I want to see more Nvidia owners post their TressFX benchmarks...the game doesn't unlock for me and my GTX 580 for 5 more hours
It is a lot less than what people were thinking though so I am glad that is not all that much considering a lot of developers might take advantage of this tech unlike Physx.
Agreed. I expected it to be a big difference. I hope it gets some support from developers. I wonder if it will run well on the PS4 and Nextbox.
Why the fuck are you guys posting pics so goddamn big? Thumbnail MOFO ffs.
Seriously we have people here that can build a custom water-cooled system but apparently don't know how to thumbnail a screenshot. It happens in every thread.
god damn it. AMD has yet to email my the code for the activation, I am getting pissed here. Emailed them on friday and this morning and they have yet to email me anything.
It is a lot less than what people were thinking though so I am glad that is not all that much considering a lot of developers might take advantage of this tech unlike Physx.
Seriously we have people here that can build a custom water-cooled system but apparently don't know how to thumbnail a screenshot. It happens in every thread.
how are we so sure about this?...there's been a very small sample size to make that sort of determination yet...there's a reason Nvidia is being silent about this new feature while AMD is creating websites dedicated to TressFX...they must know that AMD performance is much higher...similar to DiRT 3 benchmarks...if Nvidia felt they could match or only have a slight performance loss compared to AMD then they would be making a bigger deal about this new hair rendering feature
Why the fuck are you guys posting pics so goddamn big? Thumbnail MOFO ffs.
Seriously we have people here that can build a custom water-cooled system but apparently don't know how to thumbnail a screenshot. It happens in every thread.
? Thumbnails still load the same image data.
It's the fact that they break tables. Most forums have rules about this sort of thing because it makes threads annoying to read.