Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ufster8 said:An X2 1.8GHz under 275$ is what I hope for because I need multitasking and speed for single threaded apps like games don't mean much to me these days I couldn't care less about 10-15 fps more.
(cf)Eclipse said:definitly not until 65nm, unless amd plans on being really agressive and making a ~400mm² die![]()
(cf)Eclipse said:s754 fo life yo!![]()
![]()
i did hear "rumor" of amd putting a video card into their cpu's.. in like 2008 or something. i doubt it'll pan out, but it's fun to think about.BillR said:At that point we are almost at the whole computer on one chip stage.
(cf)Eclipse said:i did hear "rumor" of amd putting a video card into their cpu's.. in like 2008 or something. i doubt it'll pan out, but it's fun to think about.
baron:![]()
![]()
robberbaron said:S754 has no upgrade path and their boards can only do a 410HTT. How weak is that? I mean come on, how could you like a platform that performs just as well as a 939 system but for an overall cost of $100 less? You should be ashamed of yourself to see value in something like that.
Project_2501 said:I'd love to see some ram that could do DDR820 with reasonable timings and didn't cost $34062723679648768.99 for a gig. And, my DFI onl;y goes to 460HTT, so that's DDR920... I can only imagine the use for this. lol![]()
![]()
flenser said:Microsoft would probably have to change their licensing before either AMD or Intel will release quad core cpus. The last time I checked, consumer licenses for windows were only good for 2 cpus.
Doubt it.ufster8 said:I was wondering if slower versions of X2 (1.8-2.0) will be released soon or at all? If so I would be more inclined to buy one.
BigDaddy85 said:Doubt it.
BigDaddy85 said:Doubt it.
(cf)Eclipse said:i know the ones that have one faulty core will simply have a core disabled, and 1/2 the cache if it's a toledo, and sold as an E6 venice (opposed to the E3 that it normally is)
this will probably account for all the cores that don't make the mhz cut too![]()
What about people with the Pentium Extreme Edition dual core chip? They have *gasp* four CPUs in Windoze! Oh noes!flenser said:Microsoft would probably have to change their licensing before either AMD or Intel will release quad core cpus. The last time I checked, consumer licenses for windows were only good for 2 cpus.
That will be called Athlon FX2 and cost $2000 a popfreeloader1969 said:Dual cores don't impress me as much as chips that have unlocked multipliers. How about AMD bringing out X2 chips with completely (up and down) unlocked multipliers? That would be nice to see again.
TehQuick said:That will be called Athlon FX2 and cost $2000 a pop![]()
robberbaron said:For $2000 it better do 2.6ghz at 0.8v and hit 4ghz on air.
robberbaron said:So they're just going to throw away all the dual cores that run only at 1.8 or 2.0ghz stable? It would certainly be expensive if they just kept selling them as BW Venices after disabling one core.