Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd recommend staying away from X-fi.
Crap company, crappy product tons and tons of issues with them. Some might disagree but you slowly find more and more problems the card causes as you use the card more and more, its like a used house you slowly find cracked foundations, leaking pipes etc. Creative X-fi is like a used house, just made in the 1800's thats burnt down and been rebuilt 100's of times. It always has the same core problems no matter how many times they try to 'repaint' it.
With Vista and Win7 putting an axe to EAX (Alchemy isn't a solution) you really should just invest in card from Asus or if you must get an X-fi an Azunetech (SP?) card will suffice.
You just like to make wild claims eh?
I have no muse buzzing..and I have 4 GB and XP 32bit, Vista 64 bit and Win7 64 bit
Let me guees...crappy NVIDIA chipset?![]()
Wild claims? Look on the forums champ and google search it. Thousands of people have these issues and no it isnt run on a nvidia chipset. I said i've run it on many different board with the same issues - X48 P45 P35 X58.
Driver issues are the cause of it, read what i was saying certain circumstances create the issues. Really, i could care less about what you think when i have the issues right in front of me.
I take a peek at the x-fi's every once in a while...and I still see no compelling reason to upgrade from my Audigy 2.
80% of those people as far I can see, have a NVDIA chipset..the rest I suspect is due to IRQ sharing and other stuff:
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=40613
Do some looking around, eh..
That was just vague enough to mean something!And every time I have gained in either immersion or features.
That was just vague enough to mean something!
Seriously though, what did you gain going from the Audigy 2 to the Xfi Elite, exactly? Specifics. Things that actually matter.
Yes, the cards tech specs are plastered all over Wikipedia, that's not what I was getting at. I know there are improvements on paper, but what are you actually gaining from that? What actually makes use of that extra hardware?128 hardware accelerated sounds (with 4 similtanous effects in EAX)...you try doing that on an Audigy 2...then we can talk again.
(BTW: This should be common knowledge, don't know what rock you have been living under?)
Yes, the cards tech specs are plastered all over Wikipedia, that's not what I was getting at. I know there are improvements on paper, but what are you actually gaining from that? What actually makes use of that extra hardware?
X-Fi's share the same 109dB signal to noise ratio (apart from the X-Fi Elite Pro) as my Audigy 2, so the cards are going to sound just as clear. The 24bit crystallizer on the X-Fi is worthless, as it damages audio that's already good to begin with by running dynamic EQ over it (and if you really want it, it can be replicated via software such as FFDshow). Both cards have the CMSS-3D modes relevant to my speaker configuration. The only thing that looks marginally interesting is the upgrade from EAX 4.0 to EAX 5.0, but I'm not sure the extra 64 channels would be noticeable on my 2.1 speaker setup (in the handfull of titles that actually support EAX 5.0 and can make use of those extra channels).
It really seems like a lot of money for very little gain...
Don't be so quick to assume. I've heard EAX 5.0 working in Bioshock, and I'm hard pressed to hear any difference between that and its EAX 4.0 mode.You have never heard it right?
That explains it..
So what you're saying is, it's worth it to upgrade to an X-Fi purely for the couple of games I own that support EAX 5.0...Not really, compared to the real estate in the brain dedicated to audio.