So I went into a local PC shop today looking for PATA -> SATA converters (they had none) and I looked over the price lists for PCs. The only AMD system they sold was a XP2400 based system - everything else was Intel + NVIDIA only. The only video cards stocked were 5700Us. No 9600s, 5950s, 9800 PROs, and (not really surprising considering the availability) no 6800/X800s. I was really surprised at the lack of any variety, I mean yeah it was a small business but your only choice if you wanted to shop there was a 5700U unless you ordered it.
So I asked the guy working if he sold any systems faster than the XP2400 based on AMD. "We can, but we try to keep everything P4 because we have less problems with them." Basically he told me AMDs just aren't reliable enough. Uh.. ok. I asked about AMD 64s and he said he only knew 2 people who had them and one had brought it back to the store to "fix it". Then he said "Yeah, they just weren't ready for release yet." I wanted to laugh - almost everyone I have seen post on the HF with a A64 LOVES it, and the only problems I see are pretty much the same RMA/chipset troubles all boards are plagued with. Nothing unusual.
Then I commented that I was waiting for the 939 Sockets and DDR2 and PCI-E to become more mainstream, then I planned on upgrading. He told me that would be 2 years from now At that point I realized he had no idea what he was talking about - you can already order DDR2 + PCI-E Dells, I would say in 6 months they will be fairly normal standards for any new PC.
I just don't understand how people who run a computer business can be so ignorant as to the market and how it works. And seriously, there are no system-stopping problems with A64s or AMDs in general - sure, the chipsets may not be as refined in some aspects, but thats hardly a problem that is going to cause end-user reliability issues. In fact, with Intel's current "Prescott" CPU running hot as the sun and the upcoming new socket technology, I would definitely choose an A64 system for my new build instead of a P4.
</rant>
So I asked the guy working if he sold any systems faster than the XP2400 based on AMD. "We can, but we try to keep everything P4 because we have less problems with them." Basically he told me AMDs just aren't reliable enough. Uh.. ok. I asked about AMD 64s and he said he only knew 2 people who had them and one had brought it back to the store to "fix it". Then he said "Yeah, they just weren't ready for release yet." I wanted to laugh - almost everyone I have seen post on the HF with a A64 LOVES it, and the only problems I see are pretty much the same RMA/chipset troubles all boards are plagued with. Nothing unusual.
Then I commented that I was waiting for the 939 Sockets and DDR2 and PCI-E to become more mainstream, then I planned on upgrading. He told me that would be 2 years from now At that point I realized he had no idea what he was talking about - you can already order DDR2 + PCI-E Dells, I would say in 6 months they will be fairly normal standards for any new PC.
I just don't understand how people who run a computer business can be so ignorant as to the market and how it works. And seriously, there are no system-stopping problems with A64s or AMDs in general - sure, the chipsets may not be as refined in some aspects, but thats hardly a problem that is going to cause end-user reliability issues. In fact, with Intel's current "Prescott" CPU running hot as the sun and the upcoming new socket technology, I would definitely choose an A64 system for my new build instead of a P4.
</rant>