Who Won E3?

Who Won e3??


  • Total voters
    209
I looked on the video where damage was on GT5 and didn't see it.. where does it show damage specifically?
 
I forgot, in my original post about why I thought Microsoft had the best show, that they announced Crackdown 2. Considering what was said about a sequel, in the past, I wasn't expecting it at all. Either way, I can't wait for it.
 
Quality takes time. The game is incredibly massive. 800 cars, 90 tracks.

Regarding damage, I thought there were hints it would only be for rally cars and race cars. I suspect most of the cars won't have damage.
 
Regarding damage, I thought there were hints it would only be for rally cars and race cars. I suspect most of the cars won't have damage.
There's really no excuse for that though. Especially given all manufacturers have been allowing their cars to get beaten up for a while now.

Hardly any of them will allow rollover though (which makes me wonder how Forza is getting around it)
 
Hardly any of them will allow rollover though (which makes me wonder how Forza is getting around it)

They just sent their buddy Cash over to talk to the different manufacturers. With the problems some auto manufacturers are in I'm sure they were more then willing to make some concessions, for further licensing.
 
I would rather have it all up front instead of pay dlc.
Word is you're getting both anyway. The normal game is supposed to release in two flavours... Standard, and Premium (Premium will include upcoming DLC for free... or so they say)
 
lol@ damage being more important than all of the actual announcements at e3, by any of the three companies...

Anyway, I'd give a super slight edge to MS, then Sony. Nintendo was a total failure.

MS.Sony..............................................................................Nintendo
 
GT5 will probably make me get a Playstation 3. Probably the only game I will own on PS3. Okay I might LBP... And MGS...

EDIT: E3 winnars...

Sony > MS >...> Nintendo

I'm sad that the big N doesn't even try anymore. They were awesome in the 90s IMO.
 
lol@ damage being more important than all of the actual announcements at e3, by any of the three companies...

Anyway, I'd give a super slight edge to MS, then Sony. Nintendo was a total failure.

MS.Sony..............................................................................Nintendo


lol @ usual suspect.

As far as Sony's megaton announcement, damage in GT5 is it.
 
You think damage in gt5 is more important than sony's cool new motion control system, FF14, or their exclusive with Rockstar?

Nah, it doesn't take 'the cake' but it is a huge (expected..well, hoped for) announcement. GT5 represents alot of unrealized customers, clearly evidenced not just within the last 5 posts here at [H], but all over the internet.

You don't think it's a big deal?
 
Sony.

Damage in GT5, delivered.
24c9mqb.gif
 
Nah, but it is a huge (expected..well, hoped for) announcement. GT5 represents alot of unrealized customers, clearly evidenced not just within the last 5 posts but all over the internet.

You don't think it's a big deal?

GT5 might be the hugest deal that Sony will have on their console from here on out, but other than the fact that it's still coming out...eventually...no, I don't think the consumer cares that they announced a limited damage modeling in the game. And I definitely don't think that such an announcement is bigger or more newsworthy than the actual games that were announced that we didn't already know about.
 
I liked MS's show the best of the 3, though Sony's was also impressive. If the Project Natal thing does what they said it's going to be able to do, then it would be an absolute must have accessory for the 360. Sony's motion sensing system seemed decent, but also a bit too much like the Wii for my tastes. MS has them beat hands down if Natal isn't a buggy POS when it releases.
 
GT5 might be the hugest deal that Sony will have on their console from here on out, but other than the fact that it's still coming out...eventually...no, I don't think the consumer cares that they announced a limited damage modeling in the game. And I definitely don't think that such an announcement is bigger or more newsworthy than the actual games that were announced that we didn't already know about.

It's OK you don't care, but to discount the news is laughable, to me. Ha ha. It's megaton worthy. Limited model??? That damage is from hitting the ground, ffs. That's some serious physics, though we'll need more video to verify the actual level of detail.

Kudos Stereophile, video linkage!
 
All we've seen so far is basic cosmetic damage on one class of car... probably best not to assume much more.

True, but it's pretty nice looking damage for just hitting the ground, no? I think it suggests that the model is pretty extensive, however limited it might be among other race types.

There is other excellent news from E3 but GT5 damage has me most excited. Can't sue me for that... not in Canada, anyways! ...yet :p
 
It's OK you don't care, but to discount the news is laughable, to me. Ha ha. It's megaton worthy. Limited model??? That damage is from hitting the ground, ffs. That's some serious physics, though we'll need more video to verify the actual level of detail.

Kudos Stereophile, video linkage!

I was quoting stereophile actually regarding the fact that damage will probably not be included in every car model.

I also never said I don't care. I'm just baffled that something that was already assumed to be in a game that's already announced is somehow a megaton, when an exclusive rockstar game is somehow not in comparison. Get it?
 
I was quoting stereophile actually regarding the fact that damage will probably not be included in every car model.

I also never said I don't care. I'm just baffled that something that was already assumed to be in a game that's already announced is somehow a megaton, when an exclusive rockstar game is somehow not in comparison. Get it?

Get it and still, GT5 damage is the megaton, for me. Do you get it? Reason I bought the PS3 kind of deal.

GT fans are large in numbers, to spell it out. I'm sure you knew that anyways though. We've been waiting for confirmation of just this one little fact.
 
Last edited:
Get it and still, GT5 damage is the megaton, for me. Do you get it? Reason I bought the PS3 kind of deal.

GT fans are large in numbers, to spell it out. I'm sure you knew that anyways though. We've been waiting for confirmation of just this one little fact.

My megaton for the conference is probably crackdown 2, but I wouldn't say that it's the megaton of the conference just because I like it a lot. I thought this discussion related to all of the leaks about sony having some huge game changing announcement at E3, and while you might like it a lot, damage in gt5 isn't that announcement by any standard.
 
My megaton for the conference is probably crackdown 2, but I wouldn't say that it's the megaton of the conference just because I like it a lot. I thought this discussion related to all of the leaks about sony having some huge game changing announcement at E3, and while you might like it a lot, damage in gt5 isn't that announcement by any standard.

Is your opinion! :D

Mine is GT5!!!!!!!!!!!!

/fanboy+me
 
I don't know what's the big deal with MGS Rising announcement and the Project Natal announcement.

The MGS Rising announcement was done without any real footage and Hideo Kojima said that it would be a completely new Metal Gear experience, so it could be a completely new "game" with a totally different gameplay but only using the MGS fame to sell. He also said in the Sony keynote that the MGS4 team would be working with the MGS project for the PSP.

The Project Natal announcement was done without showing any hardware so it is hard to judge whether it is realistic or not. Sure the video looks nice but it means nothing if the hardware cost is high. All the footages were also pre-recorded so for me the videos are no different than a scene from the movie minority report.
 
I don't know what's the big deal with MGS Rising announcement and the Project Natal announcement.

The MGS Rising announcement was done without any real footage and Hideo Kojima said that it would be a completely new Metal Gear experience, so it could be a completely new "game" with a totally different gameplay but only using the MGS fame to sell. He also said in the Sony keynote that the MGS4 team would be working with the MGS project for the PSP.

The Project Natal announcement was done without showing any hardware so it is hard to judge whether it is realistic or not. Sure the video looks nice but it means nothing if the hardware cost is high. All the footages were also pre-recorded so for me the videos are no different than a scene from the movie minority report.

No, they weren't all pre recorded. They did live demos on stage. And showed the hardware even in the pre-recorded stuff.
 
I don't know what's the big deal with MGS Rising announcement and the Project Natal announcement.

The MGS Rising announcement was done without any real footage and Hideo Kojima said that it would be a completely new Metal Gear experience, so it could be a completely new "game" with a totally different gameplay but only using the MGS fame to sell. He also said in the Sony keynote that the MGS4 team would be working with the MGS project for the PSP.

The Project Natal announcement was done without showing any hardware so it is hard to judge whether it is realistic or not. Sure the video looks nice but it means nothing if the hardware cost is high. All the footages were also pre-recorded so for me the videos are no different than a scene from the movie minority report.

I don't think you actually watched the conference...first, the hardware is absolutely shown in multiple places, including hands on for the gaming press. It's a camera bar with a sensor and two cameras.

Second, you also apparently missed the live demos, of at least 5 different natal uses...the ball game, the dancing avatar, the painting thing, etc. All live, demo'ed on stage in real time.
 
The Project Natal announcement was done without showing any hardware so it is hard to judge whether it is realistic or not. Sure the video looks nice but it means nothing if the hardware cost is high. All the footages were also pre-recorded so for me the videos are no different than a scene from the movie minority report.
Did you miss the painting... because that wasn't pre-recorded.

Oh ffs, I just realised who I replied to.
 
I don't think you actually watched the conference...first, the hardware is absolutely shown in multiple places, including hands on for the gaming press. It's a camera bar with a sensor and two cameras.

Second, you also apparently missed the live demos, of at least 5 different natal uses...the ball game, the dancing avatar, the painting thing, etc. All live, demo'ed on stage in real time.

The hardware is only shown in the pre-recorded videos, there is no hardware shown on the stage. They said that they are showing the tech behind closed door for selected audience, why would they show it only to selected people if it is realistic? Watch the keynote again if you don't believe what I said, the Project Natal thing starts at around 90 minutes.
http://e3.gamespot.com/press-conference/microsoft-e3/
 
The hardware is only shown in the pre-recorded videos, there is no hardware shown on the stage. They said that they are showing the tech behind closed door for selected audience, why would they show it only to selected people if it is realistic? Watch the keynote again if you don't believe what I said, the Project Natal thing starts at around 90 minutes.
http://e3.gamespot.com/press-conference/microsoft-e3/

The hardware is a black bar on a black tv. It was there. They just didn't focus on it. But you can see the bar in some shots.

It is being shown to select people because it's far from complete. Not ready for open demos for all. It's not coming out this year. A select group of people can be walked through the demos that have been prepared and then report on it. It's pretty standard for select members of the press to be shown products in advance.

A group of gaming reporters were already shown the next WoW expansion in action months ago. But due to an NDA they can't talk about it. Does that mean the next expansion doesn't exist?
 
The hardware is only shown in the pre-recorded videos, there is no hardware shown on the stage. They said that they are showing the tech behind closed door for selected audience, why would they show it only to selected people if it is realistic? Watch the keynote again if you don't believe what I said, the Project Natal thing starts at around 90 minutes.
http://e3.gamespot.com/press-conference/microsoft-e3/

I guess Mass effect 2 doesn't exist either because that's only being showed behind closed doors too right? E3 - you appear to not understand it.

And I notice you seem to have dropped the "they didn't show it being used live" crap.
 
The hardware is a black bar on a black tv. It was there. They just didn't focus on it. But you can see the bar in some shots.

It is being shown to select people because it's far from complete. Not ready for open demos for all. It's not coming out this year. A select group of people can be walked through the demos that have been prepared and then report on it. It's pretty standard for select members of the press to be shown products in advance.

A group of gaming reporters were already shown the next WoW expansion in action months ago. But due to an NDA they can't talk about it. Does that mean the next expansion doesn't exist?

Can you point me any shot showing the hardware on stage because I've watched the keynote a few times to look for it.
 
Can you point me any shot showing the hardware on stage because I've watched the keynote a few times to look for it.
Wait... you're actually suggesting that the on stage stuff is faked?

Superb. A new low even for you. Still, if so that's some fucking fantastic choreography from the people on stage. Congrats to them.
 
Wait... you're actually suggesting that the on stage stuff is faked?

Superb. A new low even for you. Still, if so that's some fucking fantastic choreography from the people on stage. Congrats to them.

It's all fake!

Susan Boyle is fake!
 
Back
Top