Aug 7, 2009 #1 R rjolin01 [H]ard|Gawd Joined Aug 31, 2008 Messages 1,399 Is a WD Caviar Black/Green with 32mb cache and 7200rpm faster or slower than a Raptor at 10,000 rpms but only 16mb cache?
Is a WD Caviar Black/Green with 32mb cache and 7200rpm faster or slower than a Raptor at 10,000 rpms but only 16mb cache?
Aug 7, 2009 #2 Dangman Ninja Editor SuperMod Joined Dec 15, 2005 Messages 46,056 The Raptor would have better seek times but in transfer speeds and whatnot, the WD 1TB Black outperforms the older Raptor
The Raptor would have better seek times but in transfer speeds and whatnot, the WD 1TB Black outperforms the older Raptor
Aug 8, 2009 #3 C crewxp Limp Gawd Joined Jul 27, 2009 Messages 393 I like the black overall. I never really liked the raptors much. If you want PERFORMANCE, look into SSD's.. if you haven't already
I like the black overall. I never really liked the raptors much. If you want PERFORMANCE, look into SSD's.. if you haven't already
Aug 8, 2009 #4 D DougLite Supreme [H]ardness Joined Jan 3, 2005 Messages 4,764 Only the current Raptors are truly competitive with current 7200RPM drives. In addition to larger caches, newer 7200RPM drives have much higher density (which make typical desktop seeks faster) and higher transfer rates than older Raptor designs.
Only the current Raptors are truly competitive with current 7200RPM drives. In addition to larger caches, newer 7200RPM drives have much higher density (which make typical desktop seeks faster) and higher transfer rates than older Raptor designs.
Aug 17, 2009 #6 MrGuvernment Fully [H] 2FA Joined Aug 3, 2004 Messages 24,418 then get a 1TB or larger drive . Denser platters - faster over all
Aug 17, 2009 #7 S Syntax Error 2[H]4U Joined Jan 14, 2008 Messages 2,979 WD6400AAKS/WD6401AALS shortstroked would give pretty good performance on the cheap.