What is with intel hype?

UltimaParadox said:
I am just commenting on the fact that the guy said that Intel was based out of Israel, which is not true. Since Intel was based in Santa Clara California since its existence

No Iam tring to think were Intel has FABS
 
Any one know what countries INTEL has HI teck CPU fabs located in.

USA lots of them . Ireland I believe . Israel. I believe these are the only ones with the CPU fabs.

What American CPU company HAS Zero FABS in the Home LAND
 
MrWizard6600 said:
no i agree with the first dude. go compare some FX-62 benchies to that of conroe.

Intel has always had approx the same performance as AMD. i mean there EE line is pretty sweet. but the FX series... is cheaper.



really? i heard M2 was due out in june.

There is no FX-62 that's why they overclocked the FX-60 to 2.8GHz! If there was an FX-62 it would more then likely be 2.8GHz.
 
Man, I'm all for this Intel-hype. I actually am upset with myself for having my Athlon64 3000+ instead of a P4 3GHz. I know it sounds stupid, but I just love Intel that much. I've given AMD some chances, but my first experiences were crappy due to two 1.4GHz Athlons burning up when they were installed correctly. I've had no problems with my current setup, but I'd just be happier with an Intel.

And now, with the news that Intel will finally be the chip to have regardless, that just brings a smile to my face. So... hype it up! :D

Also, reading the Anandtech article on Conroe, how can you contest the whole benchmarking deal when they stated that the F.E.A.R. benchmark was not influenced by Intel and that the Conroe chip performed 41% better? Oh well... :eek:
 
Back
Top