What do you use to test stability?

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by M76, Nov 22, 2019.

What do you use to test stability?

  1. Prime 95 Smallest FFT with AVX2

    1 vote(s)
    4.8%
  2. Prime 95 Small FFT with AVX2

    1 vote(s)
    4.8%
  3. Prime 95 Blend with AVX2

    4 vote(s)
    19.0%
  4. Prime 95 Smallest FFT no AVX2

    1 vote(s)
    4.8%
  5. Prime 95 Small FFT no AVX2

    1 vote(s)
    4.8%
  6. Prime 95 Blend no AVX2

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Cinebench 20

    2 vote(s)
    9.5%
  8. CPU-Z stress test

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. Other

    11 vote(s)
    52.4%
  1. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,791
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    prime95-1.png

    People always gloat that it is not stable unless it can run prime95 But it has multiple settings and I rarely see anyone clarify.
    So I wish to know what is your choice.

    How many hours is a question for another day.
     
  2. ThatITGuy

    ThatITGuy Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    257
    Joined:
    May 5, 2017
    I always used Blend, because I thought the idea was to push not just the CPU, but also the RAM, since its stability would play a part in overall stability of the system and would be affected by the overclocks
     
  3. VanGoghComplex

    VanGoghComplex [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,821
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2016
  4. Dark12

    Dark12 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,541
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    If I can get past POST then I consider it rock solid.
     
  5. TheSlySyl

    TheSlySyl Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    210
    Joined:
    May 30, 2018
    Usually the Blend with AVX and at least one other prime95. Then a ridiculous scenario of me attempting to run two different heavily multi-threaded games and a 4k video simultaneously all on different monitors.
     
  6. notarat

    notarat [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,901
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    I voted "Other" because to stest stability I use Tequila. Just kidding. Scotch.
     
    cyclone3d likes this.
  7. Falkentyne

    Falkentyne [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,582
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2000
    Small FFT with AVX is more irrelevant as a stress test than before, because the chips become completely impossible to cool unless you are using non conventional cooling methods (direct die, multiple 360 rads, etc). You can't say this is a valid stress test if your chip needs enough voltage so it runs at 115C just trying to pass it without a BSOD, CPU L0 error, or a dropped thread. It's a thermal solution test, not a stress test now.

    FMA3 testing (AVX2) is even more worthless because NO game uses FMA3 instructions. Or AVX 512 instructions. I am not even sure if any game uses AVX2 instructions. I know AVX2 is part of directmath, but still. People MUST remember that if your prime95 FMA3 (subset of AVX2) reaches 105C and crashes and burns, that does **NOT** mean that a game that uses FMA3 (if it exists) will crash! Not even close. Why does Prime95 small FFT FMA3 reach 105C on 8 core processors? Because the instructions REMAIN in the CPU caches and do not ever access main memory, so the CPU never has a chance to cool down or run other instructions. That is NOT how real applications work (except applications DESIGNED to crush prime numbers, which games do NOT do).

    Even SSE2 4.2 is a bit of a stretch. Phenom doesn't support it, for instance.

    If you're trying to be Battlefield 5 game stable, Realbench 2.56, Cinebench R20 and HWbot x.265 or x.264 stress tests are a lot more realistic.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2019
    PhaseNoise likes this.
  8. cyclone3d

    cyclone3d [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    13,129
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    That and memes.
     
  9. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,791
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Who said anything about games? I want my system to be stable in every possible real world scenario it might encounter, not just games. And especially not select games.
     
  10. freeagentt

    freeagentt [H]Lite

    Messages:
    85
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2018
    I’ve seen prime fail after 24 hours, so to me it’s a waste of time. Also, if you can’t run an app because it makes your cpu too hot then you shouldn’t be running at that clock speed.
     
  11. Spartacus09

    Spartacus09 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,113
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2018
    Intel burn test and then prime 95
     
  12. SticKx911

    SticKx911 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,252
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2004
    depends on the needs of the box. Typically I’ll just play a few games and keep an eye on it over a few days. If there’s issues, I’ll re assess, otherwise I’ll keep it rolling until that day comes. My 2500k rig is starting to dislike its 1ghz oc so I’ve had to tweak a lot more lately. And that’s all I’ve done. A little instability does not bother me.

    For something I or a family member where dependability matters, I’d either not OC or run occt and furmark for a bit and watch temps. No bench will prove a completely stable system, but as long as temps are well within spec, I know I’m not throttling at least.
     
  13. Falkentyne

    Falkentyne [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,582
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2000
    Prime95 is NOT an "App". Neither is LinX 0.9.6
    They are power viruses. Prime95 can be used as an app if you know what you're doing with the test options.

    With that logic you wrote in your post, no one should be overclocking their video cards if they burn up the VRM's running furmark.
    Come on, man.
     
  14. freeagentt

    freeagentt [H]Lite

    Messages:
    85
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2018
    Well, not sure what to tell you, I can run them. Yeah things can get toasty if I am at the limit of my hardware, but I can run them. There's no difference between now, and the good old days. If it makes it too hot, you gotta turn it down. Sure you can use offsets now a days when certain instructions appear, but to me, that's cheating.. like just to be able to say me too. Fake it to make it, know what I mean? Sorry I'm not trying to be a jerk, that's just how I see it. If what you do works for you, all the power man, I'm not going to tell you how to run your pc. I set mine up so that I can run anything I throw at it. And if it makes it too hot, then I gotta turn it down, because I just use straight voltage, no offsets. My GPU is kind of out of my hands, it does its own thing, usually 1 bin higher than I set.. but its just stock voltage. I am not worried at all about my VRM's in the slightest, as I have many, many CFM's at my disposal.
     
  15. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,791
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    If your car spins the tires you need bigger tires, you can't blame the asphalt. So if your CPU gets too hot you need better cooling, and not "let's avoid doing that test then". It's a similar situation as VW cheating on emission tests.

    A stress test is supposed to be more demanding than real world situations, otherwise it wouldn't be much of a stress test.

    I'd rather have 200Mhz smaller epeen, than have my CPU crash during a 24 hour render.
     
  16. VanGoghComplex

    VanGoghComplex [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,821
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2016
    This right here is why it's almost impossible to say what the "best" stress test is. Use case is so fundamental in the choice.

    If your overclock isn't stable, you may lose a day of render time. Of course you're going to want to most demanding test and ensure that your system will not crash under any circumstances.

    If my overclock isn't stable, my leisure time gets one reboot's worth of interruption. Maybe I lose a few minutes worth of work on a 3D model. I can be much less stringent with my testing methodology because the potential impact is so small for me.

    This hardline "there is only one best way to stress test" mentality has got to stop. It's not reasonable.
     
    noko likes this.
  17. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,791
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    When I say the best way I mean the way that ensures stability in every real world scenario, while not testing for loads that are entirely impossible in real world application.
    If a stability test is only good for gaming application then it is not good in my book. Then again there can be wild differences from game to game too. So I wouldn't trust any game as a test. The only way to test for all around stability is synthetic stress tests.
     
  18. VanGoghComplex

    VanGoghComplex [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,821
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2016
    That still doesn't make sense though. There's no such thing as "loads that are entirely impossible in real world application." Computers are general purpose machines. Sure, there are applications that are much less common, (calculating primes as fast as possible comes to mind), but they are still real world applications for someone. Most of the tests I know of are by-products of someone's effort to do real work. And claiming a system is 100% stable is essentially attempting to prove a negative. You can't say "this system will never crash." You can only say "this system has not crashed yet."

    I know my argument is very pedantic, but I reiterate it to preface this point: it makes no sense to use stress tests that aren't good for your use case, and the total number of real use cases is essentially the sum total of PC users, plus one: Kyle Bennett counts twice.
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
    noko and GalacticAC like this.
  19. freeagentt

    freeagentt [H]Lite

    Messages:
    85
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2018
    I like Linpack Xtreme, its what I run. Gets a bit warmer than Intel Burn Test.
     
  20. DrDoU

    DrDoU 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,462
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
  21. TheSlySyl

    TheSlySyl Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    210
    Joined:
    May 30, 2018
    I really should just use MH World as my gpu stability test, it crashes under such a weirdly light stress load.
     
  22. thesmokingman

    thesmokingman [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,399
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Blend with avx if you really mean it with stability.
     
  23. empirebuilder1

    empirebuilder1 n00b

    Messages:
    7
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2019
    The all of twice I've had to, I run multiple tests. P95 is a good start, but I mainly use OCCT as it has a more broad-spectrum tests, with a lot of options (heat generating, error-generating, Linpack, memory hammer, etc).
     
  24. zoobaka

    zoobaka n00b

    Messages:
    16
    Joined:
    May 8, 2018
    OCCT large avx2, linpack

    3 hours each stable