Chris_B
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- May 29, 2001
- Messages
- 5,484
Got mine in the post this morning, shuttle 350 watt psu seems incapable of runnig it with 2 hdd's and a dvd rom in tow, had to disconnect 1 hdd and the dvd rom drive to get this bastard running.
Size comparrison to x1900
Ran some basic benchmarks over the last couple of days on my x1900 in xp and vista 64 just to compare them to the new card:
The cod one obviously shows that there has to be some kinda aa bug going on, all tests ran at 1920x1200 4xfsaa 16xhqaf: fx60 @ 2.8ghz
Company of Heroes Performance Test (demo version): Average 43,6 Min 17.4, Max 121.5 (x1900xt)
Company of Heroes Performance Test (demo version): Average 64.6, Min 30.5, Max 180.9 (2900xt)
2007-05-14 17:34:25 - cod2sp_s crossing the rhine (x1900xt)
Frames: 5218 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 28.988 - Min: 15 - Max: 56 (vista 64)
2007-05-15 16:39:31 - cod2sp_s crossing the rhine (2900xt)
Frames: 5346 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 29.700 - Min: 15 - Max: 57 (vista 64)
2007-05-14 17:43:00 - Quake4 air defense trenches (x1900xt)
Frames: 8181 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 45.450 - Min: 13 - Max: 62 (vista 64)
2007-05-15 17:37:52 - Quake4 air defense trenches (2900xt)
Frames: 10473 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 58.183 - Min: 32 - Max: 62 (vista 64)
Fear Performance Test: Average 42, Min 19, Max 95 (x1900xt)
Fear Performance Test: Average 51, Min 18 Max 99 (2900xt)
Half Life 2 Lost coast stress test 70.8fps (average) (x1900xt)
Half Life 2 Lost coast stress test 70.17fps (average) (2900xt)
Doom 3 54.2 fps (x1900xt)
Doom 3 70.5fps (2900xt)
I dunno how reliable these are as i think the card is just barely geting enough juice to run, notice how company of heroes seems to love vista though. In the benches i done in xp the performance for the x1900xt didn't even break 100fps in coh.
oos can't forget about cockmark 06 (vista 64)
3DMark Score 5817 3DMarks (x1900xt)
SM 2.0 Score 2247 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 2557 Marks
CPU Score 1977 Marks
3DMark Score 9293 3DMarks (2900xt)
SM 2.0 Score 4219 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 4627 Marks
CPU Score 1952 Marks
Size comparrison to x1900
Ran some basic benchmarks over the last couple of days on my x1900 in xp and vista 64 just to compare them to the new card:
The cod one obviously shows that there has to be some kinda aa bug going on, all tests ran at 1920x1200 4xfsaa 16xhqaf: fx60 @ 2.8ghz
Company of Heroes Performance Test (demo version): Average 43,6 Min 17.4, Max 121.5 (x1900xt)
Company of Heroes Performance Test (demo version): Average 64.6, Min 30.5, Max 180.9 (2900xt)
2007-05-14 17:34:25 - cod2sp_s crossing the rhine (x1900xt)
Frames: 5218 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 28.988 - Min: 15 - Max: 56 (vista 64)
2007-05-15 16:39:31 - cod2sp_s crossing the rhine (2900xt)
Frames: 5346 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 29.700 - Min: 15 - Max: 57 (vista 64)
2007-05-14 17:43:00 - Quake4 air defense trenches (x1900xt)
Frames: 8181 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 45.450 - Min: 13 - Max: 62 (vista 64)
2007-05-15 17:37:52 - Quake4 air defense trenches (2900xt)
Frames: 10473 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 58.183 - Min: 32 - Max: 62 (vista 64)
Fear Performance Test: Average 42, Min 19, Max 95 (x1900xt)
Fear Performance Test: Average 51, Min 18 Max 99 (2900xt)
Half Life 2 Lost coast stress test 70.8fps (average) (x1900xt)
Half Life 2 Lost coast stress test 70.17fps (average) (2900xt)
Doom 3 54.2 fps (x1900xt)
Doom 3 70.5fps (2900xt)
I dunno how reliable these are as i think the card is just barely geting enough juice to run, notice how company of heroes seems to love vista though. In the benches i done in xp the performance for the x1900xt didn't even break 100fps in coh.
oos can't forget about cockmark 06 (vista 64)
3DMark Score 5817 3DMarks (x1900xt)
SM 2.0 Score 2247 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 2557 Marks
CPU Score 1977 Marks
3DMark Score 9293 3DMarks (2900xt)
SM 2.0 Score 4219 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 4627 Marks
CPU Score 1952 Marks