"Agile" software development may be trendy and hip, but does not create in users a sense of obligation to accept an inferior product or change for the sake of change with no notable improvements. Agile development did not give Microsoft a license to fire the entire QA division before ensuring the Windows product wouldn't become worse for it.It's got nothing to do with faith but an understanding of how modern software works. All non-trivial software has bugs and continuous, iterative development and delivery has become the prevailing practice in software all across the board.
Users don't care how the sausage is made. And Windows 10's been a disaster that started out with a scandal (GWX), and has been in a constant state of flux ever since - often breaking or outright removing features in every major update.
In earlier Windows days, you still had real engineers and a real QA team putting out well-tested service packs that delta updated - didn't require a full-install disguised as a "feature update" that reset or outright removed installed programs. And you had windows updates you could trust, rather than having to be on guard against them. There was no selfie obsessed millennial running the show and trying to infest the desktop with useless me-too social apps and digital assistants meant for devices they aren't selling.
Windows 10's continuing anemic adoption rate - still unable to topple Windows 7 - tells you everything. Nobody's choosing it. They're ending up with it, barely tolerating it, and generally ignoring all the bloatware mobile focused crap.
Last edited: