• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

T1 vs. DSL

amenthes said:
You meant Kbps, correct?
Yes. Im hoping for more once I move my bridge outside (802.11 doesnt work too well with long distances, going through a wall. But, its 802.11b, I dont really expect much of a gain (usually peaks out at 3Mbps Rx).

amenthes said:
I wasn't aware there was a wireless tech.capable of those speeds. Any idea what technology they're using? Is that the Motorola equipment you're referring to?When I say wireless isn't reliable, I'm referring to the service usually offered to home or business subscribers. There is some very reliable Point to Point setups out there, but as you say they run into many thousands of dollars.
Ahem... tens of thousands of dollars :). Looks like it uses two radios at each site, one for Rx and one for Tx.

amenthes said:
We have had a fairly large wireless rollout around this area, and I've heard plenty of horror stories about interference, loss of signal, etc. It all depends on the geography and weather of course.... But it generally seems to be far less reliable, and far slower, than competing technologies.

Wireless, no matter what technology is going to be flakey at times 802.11b, like what I use is probably the worst of them all. Id assume the 20k per-link motorola wireless backhaul setup would be up at the top for reliability, but you still need to invest a fortune and have line of sight. I just mentioned the whole wireless mess, because the OP sounded like there wasnt any other options to get higher upload speeds. Two ISP's here are using it, because im sure its far cheaper for them to pay out 60k for a 900Mbps connection out in the middle of nowhere, compared to running fiber optics all over to three different sites.

So anyways...
 
if you need 1.5 up and down, there is SDSL. The ONLY reason to go for T1 is because of uptime. That's all there is to it. If that's not all that important to you, get ADSL or SDSL and save yourself some money.
 
QwertyJuan said:
Motorola Canopy is 'supposed' to be capable of 7Mb/sec.... I am currently using it with a 600/150 package.... but have used a FULL T1 on it before, and it worked flawless.


Depends what hardware you get.....I have a few clients on the Canopy they get through a strategic partner of mine...he lights up a lots of businesses nearby my office.

We're currently awaiting grant approval from a school client of mine..to shoot a 15 meg Canopy pipe across 8 miles of sound (water)...to an island.
 
Back
Top