Yes. Im hoping for more once I move my bridge outside (802.11 doesnt work too well with long distances, going through a wall. But, its 802.11b, I dont really expect much of a gain (usually peaks out at 3Mbps Rx).amenthes said:You meant Kbps, correct?
Ahem... tens of thousands of dollarsamenthes said:I wasn't aware there was a wireless tech.capable of those speeds. Any idea what technology they're using? Is that the Motorola equipment you're referring to?When I say wireless isn't reliable, I'm referring to the service usually offered to home or business subscribers. There is some very reliable Point to Point setups out there, but as you say they run into many thousands of dollars.
amenthes said:We have had a fairly large wireless rollout around this area, and I've heard plenty of horror stories about interference, loss of signal, etc. It all depends on the geography and weather of course.... But it generally seems to be far less reliable, and far slower, than competing technologies.
Wireless, no matter what technology is going to be flakey at times 802.11b, like what I use is probably the worst of them all. Id assume the 20k per-link motorola wireless backhaul setup would be up at the top for reliability, but you still need to invest a fortune and have line of sight. I just mentioned the whole wireless mess, because the OP sounded like there wasnt any other options to get higher upload speeds. Two ISP's here are using it, because im sure its far cheaper for them to pay out 60k for a 900Mbps connection out in the middle of nowhere, compared to running fiber optics all over to three different sites.
So anyways...