C'mon, you act like we don't have a ton of not only job opportunities, but social service available to ensure that people aren't' starving to death. The thing is, not everyone wants to work 40 hours plus a week at a close to minimum wage job busting their ass, when you can make in three hours what takes other people three weeks.Zarathustra[H];1041160281 said:If it were victimless I'd take that approach as well, and just not associate with those people, but the truth is, many women are forced by their economic situations to humiliate themselves and sell their bodies, and that just isn't right.
Others need the high income because they are addicted to drugs which they can't afford on lower salaries, which is sad for the "bottom barrel" prostitutes.
But especially high-end prostitutes can make more than doctors. And if you think about it, a quarter of the women we know are "informal" prostitutes that will go out seeking a boyfriend that has plenty of money to support her, the only difference is that they are selling sex exclusively to one guy instead of many, but its still ultimately an informal sex for money relationship. Don't believe it? Try to pickup a random girl dressed in a walmart shirt, shorts, and flip flops, and then do the same in a $1500 suit riding up in a Lamborghini Gallardo. You'll need rolls of duck-tape to keep dozens of panties from dropping around you.
And really, everyone now is praising that elementary school teacher or figured out she can make triple digits doing 15 second vine videos twerking and quit her job. Is simulating riding a cock on video for large sums of money REALLY that different from prostitution or running a "happy ending" massage service for clients or being a porn-star? And how is it that pornography, for which the internet was invented, is not considered prostitution? Its sex for money... yeah that's prostitution. The camera doesn't change that.