Dangman
Ninja Editor SuperMod
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2005
- Messages
- 46,056
Nope. The P43/P45 are rock solid chipsets. The G43/G45 chipsets are not that good compared to their P43/P45 brothers in terms of overclocking, stability, and features.I think Tiraides very early in this thread mentioned something that the G43/45 have had some problems- does that mean the P43/45 also have problems?
I might also just get the asus micro atx and put it into the mid tower since I read online that it's possible. Which do you recommend: micro atx mobo in my previous build's mid tower (to save money on the case), micro atx mobo in a new sff case (my original plan), atx mobo in my mid tower?
If you don't mind having that ATX case, then go for either the mATX or ATX mobo. Just figure which mobo fits your needs best.
Can you just briefly explain what each of these is used for: RAID, sata ports (difference from esata?), pci slots (how is this different from pci-e slots), legacy ports, firewire, and gigabit ports.
- SATA ports are the current connectors for hard drives. eSATA is a sort of USB version of SATA in terms of external connectivity. Basically eSATA is the external version of SATA. In other words, you can now connect external hard drives and get faster speeds via eSATA rather than USB.
- PCI are an older interface for sound cards, NICs, etc. PCI-E is a significantly faster and more advanced version of PCI to put in simple terms.
- Legacy ports are parallel and serial ports. If you don't know what they are, then more than likely you don't need them.
- Gigabit NICs is the actual ethernet connection on the mobo. Gigabit is the speed of the ethernet connection. It won't increase your actual downloading or internet browsing speeds BUT it speeds up LAN transfers like from your PC to another PC on your network.
- RAID: read this:
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2007/06/11/understanding_raid/1
But for simplicity sake, just avoid using RAID altogether.
I was just wondering because Tiraides recommended the E8400 over the E8200. The person I'm building this for wants at least an E8200, but I can try explaining what you said. How much of a performance drop would you notice from E8200 to E5200 and E2200?
For all those general tasks (web browsing, word processing, watching HD content, etc), you would not notice a single difference or performance drop between the E8200 to E5200 to E2200.
Is either of the E2200/5200 ok for a final build with no intermediate upgrades (the person wants to use it for about 4 years)? What I mean is, would an E8200 somehow be "less obsolete" than an E2200 in 4 years time?
Oh for four years then? Hmm, well to start off, the E8200 is a very very poor choice for CPU considering the faster E8400 is just $10 more. In this particular situation, I guess it would be OK to get the E8400 over the E2200 or E5200. The higher performance of the E8400 might be justified due to such a long period of time. Though to throw this out there: I still know a few people who still use older Pentium D systems for just general tasks for close to three years now and they're not anywhere near disatisfied with their systems. So certainly the E2200 has a long shelf life considering that it's faster than those old Pentium Ds.