spenny2112
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2007
- Messages
- 382
What do you guys think about the Razer Mako's in terms of sound quality?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are Razer so they suck.
Please do not waste your $$ and go get the JVC HAR-X900 instead.
Not trying to justify its expensive cost but what a horrible assumption. Have you even read all the glowing reviews this system received? Just because Razer is known for making input devices doesn't mean their venture to the audio world will be subpar.
As for the topic, personally I think you can do much better by finding a used Klipsch ProMedia 5.1 (usually 150-200) than spending $400 on a 2.1 system. Unless you absolutely listen to music all day and are destined to find the best 2.1's then I'd say either the Makos or this.
Not trying to justify its expensive cost but what a horrible assumption. Have you even read all the glowing reviews this system received? Just because Razer is known for making input devices doesn't mean their venture to the audio world will be subpar.
As for the topic, personally I think you can do much better by finding a used Klipsch ProMedia 5.1 (usually 150-200) than spending $400 on a 2.1 system. Unless you absolutely listen to music all day and are destined to find the best 2.1's then I'd say either the Makos or this.
Speaking as someone who has Makos, I've been very happy with them. Compared with M10s for example, and yes I have a set of those too, I prefer the Makos for gaming and movies although I would chose the Swans for music.
Are they overpriced? Absolutely. Do I care? Nope.
Have you even heard the Makos, spaceman? If not, and I don't believe for a second you have, then you're not really in a position to judge. Posting hundreds of pages of Razer-hate isn't going to change that.
lol i like reading your posts spaceman
Me too. They make me feel warm inside.
He's the kind of person you would do the opposite of what he told you just to spite him... of course, only if it meant he'd respond indignantly, otherwise it'd be a waste even reading his replies.
That is bullshit. Nothing made by razer sounds good. You just like the bass. Never presume anything about me or what I know. I don't get pissed off just b/c I think I am right. I Know that I am right.
It is called the old xbox Spherex. I have these for my tv speakers b/c my wife can't stand seeing speakers so I have to use something tiny. This is what razer's "scientists" ripped off and put some ooh ah packaging around. Tiny omnipolar satellites which are way too small to produce real sound. There is a HUGE hole in their frequency response. I have to crank up the sub to 150hz to cover this. I would bet the mako satellites don't even hit 200hz because they are even smaller than the spherex. Bullshit overpriced CRAP.
Die.
Off topic: I have the Xbox Spherex sub...got it from Parts Express for $32 shipped. Slapped in a 70w plate amp and I must say it sound pretty good. Also how do you like the Spherex sats? I was thinking about buying them for a cheap 5.1 setup.
Keep your companion 5.
You go with Swan, M-Audio, Audioengine, Dayton, BIC for entry level pc audio. I have only written about 900 pages on this so far. What's another post?
I have been doing research on this speaker. THX was the one that designed that speaker, razer just happen to market them. ... But would you guys say this the better speaker compared to the Bose companion 5?