Hi there,
I'm putting together a new system with a Raid 5 based on Ubuntu 8.10 and was wondering about the speed when testing it with bonnie++
My system:
Mainboard: Asus M3A78-EM
CPU: Amd Athlon X2 BE-2400 EE
RAM: 2GB
Harddisks: 3X1000GB Samsung Spinpoint F1 HD103UJ
I set up the system as follows:
Raid 1 for /boot 500MB (uses all 3 HD's)
1.5 GB on every harddisk for swap
Raid 5 for the rest of the sytem and other data
When running bonnie++ on the raid 5 I get this:
Seems to be slower than with a single harddrive or could it be correct?
Thanks
I'm putting together a new system with a Raid 5 based on Ubuntu 8.10 and was wondering about the speed when testing it with bonnie++
My system:
Mainboard: Asus M3A78-EM
CPU: Amd Athlon X2 BE-2400 EE
RAM: 2GB
Harddisks: 3X1000GB Samsung Spinpoint F1 HD103UJ
I set up the system as follows:
Raid 1 for /boot 500MB (uses all 3 HD's)
1.5 GB on every harddisk for swap
Raid 5 for the rest of the sytem and other data
When running bonnie++ on the raid 5 I get this:
lizardking@linuxtier:~$ bonnie++ -d /home/linuxshare -s 4g:256k -r 2g
Writing with putc()...done
Writing intelligently...done
Rewriting...done
Reading with getc()...done
Reading intelligently...done
start 'em...done...done...done...
Create files in sequential order...done.
Stat files in sequential order...done.
Delete files in sequential order...done.
Create files in random order...done.
Stat files in random order...done.
Delete files in random order...done.
Version 1.03c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size:chnk K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
linuxtier 4G:256k 40105 88 66121 39 35940 25 49970 95 99406 38 119.3 11
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 14100 88 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++
linuxtier,4G:256k,40105,88,66121,39,35940,25,49970,95,99406,38,119.3,11,16,14100,88,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++
Seems to be slower than with a single harddrive or could it be correct?
Thanks