The Quadro card has been highly recommended for the work I intend to put it to. That is, digital photography involving large composite files, some approaoching a gig in size, and I'll be "making" games, using 3D Max, Maya and some of the gaming editors, mainly UnrealED. I know that the high-end gaming cards (8800) will do a great job rendering 3d construction, but the system requirements are very heavy for a build and I see that situation increasing. Each new generation of the editors tend to show more complexity and I am hoping for a video card that will handle the ever increasing workload for as long into the future as possible.
The cost for the higher end Quadro cards is steep, but whether or not the price is reasonable, these cards appear to offer the goods for specific applications. The techs I have spoken with have all recommended these cards. Sure, I'd rather purchase an 8800GTX at $800.00 than a Quadro at 2, 3 or 4 X's that price, but I'm not convinced I'll have the right tool for the job. I've posted here hoping for some info as to why these cards are not referred to as often as the "gaming cards", and to better understand what the Quadro's performance is like for 2D.
I would also bet a quadro can play a game just fine too....unless I'm concerned about winning the Unreal Tournament.
If you have experience running a Quadro 3500, 4500 etc.I'm wondering how you find it handles the basics of 2D video display (colour/contrast etc, digital photography) as well as it's gaming performance.
Thanks!!!
RobertM
(This was also posted into a thread in the Hot Deals forum, adding to a discussion about Quadro pricing and subsequent value.)
The cost for the higher end Quadro cards is steep, but whether or not the price is reasonable, these cards appear to offer the goods for specific applications. The techs I have spoken with have all recommended these cards. Sure, I'd rather purchase an 8800GTX at $800.00 than a Quadro at 2, 3 or 4 X's that price, but I'm not convinced I'll have the right tool for the job. I've posted here hoping for some info as to why these cards are not referred to as often as the "gaming cards", and to better understand what the Quadro's performance is like for 2D.
I would also bet a quadro can play a game just fine too....unless I'm concerned about winning the Unreal Tournament.
If you have experience running a Quadro 3500, 4500 etc.I'm wondering how you find it handles the basics of 2D video display (colour/contrast etc, digital photography) as well as it's gaming performance.
Thanks!!!
RobertM
(This was also posted into a thread in the Hot Deals forum, adding to a discussion about Quadro pricing and subsequent value.)