Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conker said:I have a agp system works great in games and now they are forcing everyone to spend another 300 bucks on a new system. They should just make both agp and pci-e. Where is this petition.
My computer isnt even a year old. I am only 16 and I can't piss out money to spend on computers. Really I don't even care about the 7800 i just wanted to accomplish getting an agp version made, lol.I(illa Bee said:RIP AGP, you were good to me, but now your dead...
BTW: there not going to make a AGP 7800GTX, and there will be no further AGP...
You can buy your self a PCIe mobo cheap now, and you should allready have a new Pentium or AMD64 to put on it, if you dont then its time to upgrade that CPU as well.
Quick EDIT: if your on an older AGP platform like a Nforce2, then you CPU is too weak to feed a 7800GTX anyway.. the people really getting screwes are like Nfore3 useres where they might have a good 2500Mhz AMD 64 with AGP, that it very capable of running a 7800GTX. But anyone with AlthlonXP should not even bother with a 7800GTX untill theey upgrade that CPU and board
I bet the guy around here who has is mobile 2500+ clocked at 3GHz would disagree with this statement.I(illa Bee said:Quick EDIT: if your on an older AGP platform like a Nforce2, then you CPU is too weak to feed a 7800GTX anyway.. the people really getting screwes are like Nfore3 useres where they might have a good 2500Mhz AMD 64 with AGP, that it very capable of running a 7800GTX. But anyone with AlthlonXP should not even bother with a 7800GTX untill theey upgrade that CPU and board
GVX said:I bet the guy around here who has is mobile 2500+ clocked at 3GHz would disagree with this statement.
I understand what you're saying, however. For most of us Socket A users, there's no point in upgrading to anything higher than a 6600GT. But you have to realize that there are some people who have heavily overclocked Mobile Bartons (that would perform as well as some A64's) and others who like to play games at 2048x1536; in which case a Socket A processor wouldn't bottleneck performance because even a 7800GTX would still struggle with most games at that resolution.
In general, however, (myself included) I think that most Socket A users should consider upgrading to a FCPGA939 or LGA775 motherboard before buying such a card.
Erasmus354 said:If there is demand for the AGP parts third party manufacturers will use a bridge chip to make the AGP 7800GTX, nvidia doesn't have to release one, the third party board makers just have to make one.
I(illa Bee said:RIP AGP, you were good to me, but now your dead...
BTW: there not going to make a AGP 7800GTX, and there will be no further AGP...
You can buy your self a PCIe mobo cheap now, and you should allready have a new Pentium or AMD64 to put on it, if you dont then its time to upgrade that CPU as well.
Quick EDIT: if your on an older AGP platform like a Nforce2, then you CPU is too weak to feed a 7800GTX anyway.. the people really getting screwes are like Nfore3 useres where they might have a good 2500Mhz AMD 64 with AGP, that it very capable of running a 7800GTX. But anyone with AlthlonXP should not even bother with a 7800GTX untill theey upgrade that CPU and board
JRT said:What a load of bullshit.
AGP is not dead; there is zero advantage to PCI-e right now.
I have a K8N-neo2, this boards life span is far from over.
Why should a spend $120 on top of $600 to buy a new gen when there is no performance advantage to PCI-e?
.
JRT said:What a load of bullshit.
AGP is not dead; there is zero advantage to PCI-e right now.
I have a K8N-neo2, this boards life span is far from over.
Why should a spend $120 on top of $600 to buy a new gen when there is no performance advantage to PCI-e?
Im all for progress and raising the bar of lower end machines, but the total move to PCI-e is too quick.
Further more it now makes my resale of my current motherboard harder and worth less money.
I believe at least this generation and perhaps the next should be available in AGP as well.
That is not the point... when I was a kid some years ago, If this was then, I would have been with you. But I can think logically now after some expirance.JRT said:What a load of bullshit.
AGP is not dead; there is zero advantage to PCI-e right now.
robberbaron said:I guess the increased bandwidth which allows for discreet cards to share system memory isn't an advantage? It allows for cheaper cards since there's less ram on the card.
Also, PCI-e makes SLI possible. If you say that SLI doesn't have a performance boost, maybe you should read more. PCI-e is a great technology.
That said, I've no doubts they'll make a 7800 in AGP. DFI just released their nF3 ultra-d board, afterall.
Siciliano said:A AMD 64 3000+ s754 is still a good cpu, and even though the newest cards are CPU bound, that is just extra juice you can pump into higher resolutions and AA and AF. So what if you don't get the highest fps the card is capable of, your fps will be practically constant the more powerful the card gets. It will just hit a wall, but a sweet wall it will be.
USMC2Hard4U said:That is not the point... when I was a kid some years ago, If this was then, I would have been with you. But I can think logically now after some expirance.
Advantage right now isnt what we are concerned with. AGP has run its course and was good, lived a long time. Now, something new is here PCIe and at its Birth, its equal to AGP... but its still young, it has room to grow and evolve. AGP has already been their done that.
Do you get my point. One architecture is over now, not because it sucks, but because something new has come along.
sculelos said:And the point of high end graphics cards is to some to get the best image quality possible at a playable framerate, anyways the AGP slot should die...
Siciliano said:Oh you mean like $600...Yeah, super cheap. SLI is awesome, but it's the price of a system wide computer upgrade, which is "dumb money spent".
Siciliano said:Yeah, I see PCI-E not going anywhere with it's 16x speeds in the next 1 1/2 years. Games haven't even hit the wall for 4x (or is it 8x?).
robberbaron said:I don't know about you, but I think $50 is pretty reasonable for the performance you get with this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814121194
And TurboCache NEEDS pci-e in order to have enough bandwidth to use the system memory. You clearly need to read more about PCIe before you can discredit it like this.
TurboCache/HyperMemory cards max out the 16x bus.
Siciliano said:And the performance is pretty sub par.
Why are you noobs so hell bent on the subject of speed. What about the efficancy and protocols they use, how about that. Tell me which architecture is better. AGP or PCIe.Siciliano said:Yeah, I see PCI-E not going anywhere with it's 16x speeds in the next 1 1/2 years. Games haven't even hit the wall for 4x (or is it 8x?).
USMC2Hard4U said:Why are you noobs so hell bent on the subject of speed. What about the efficancy and protocols they use, how about that. Tell me which architecture is better. AGP or PCIe.
You cant argue whats faster. Sure, no card uses all the bandwidth AGP 8x gives, but thats not what we are arguingg here. the Question is, which architecture is better.
Some noobs never learn. And as I said before. You also shouldnt be putting your fininical situation into this, this is about what technology is more advanced, not about how you cannot afford a PCIe system.
robberbaron said:Arguing with you is useless because you deliberately miss my point.
I'm not saying the $50 card will compete with $300 cards. But, the PCI-E allows for a card that can share system ram but still compete with $100-200 AGP cards.
I dont know how long you have been dealing wiith computers, but its not just about the bandwidth.... sigh. Thats not the reason AGP should die, get that thru your skull please.Siciliano said:It's a retarded point you are trying to make, what so if it can max out the 16x bus in a stupid way, and barely have anywhere near decent performance, how is that a reason to phase out AGP, I mean real game performance and actually needing the kind of bandwidth, not switching out memory on the card to make it cheaper. It runs like crap, how is that a reason to phase out AGP. They are practically the same thing as of now and the near future unless game devs ALL OF A SUDDEN need all that wonderous bandwidth, and ofcourse the respectable SLI, are exactly the same.
USMC2Hard4U said:Why are you noobs so hell bent on the subject of speed. What about the efficancy and protocols they use, how about that. Tell me which architecture is better. AGP or PCIe.
You cant argue whats faster. Sure, no card uses all the bandwidth AGP 8x gives, but thats not what we are arguingg here. the Question is, which architecture is better.
Some noobs never learn. And as I said before. You also shouldnt be putting your fininical situation into this, this is about what technology is more advanced, not about how you cannot afford a PCIe system.
USMC2Hard4U said:I dont know how long you have been dealing wiith computers, but its not just about the bandwidth.... sigh. Thats not the reason AGP should die, get that thru your skull please.
USMC2Hard4U said:I dont know how long you have been dealing wiith computers, but its not just about the bandwidth.... sigh. Thats not the reason AGP should die, get that thru your skull please.
robberbaron said:Give it up. Us people who are actually willing to understand the technology are dummy heads and those who judge the usefulness of something on its cost and nothing else are totally smart and cool.
I guess people just dont understand. I really hope ATi and NVidia dont put out AGP cards so people are forced to eventually switch to PCIe. It will be the new standard, now is a good of time as any to do it.robberbaron said:Give it up. Us people who are actually willing to understand the technology are dummy heads and those who judge the usefulness of something on its cost and nothing else are totally smart and cool.
Siciliano said:Besides SLI, and not having to plug in 1 power cord, oh and using shitty shared memory cards that make performance worse, what does PCI-E offer right now, that fucking destroys AGP in cost-performance ratio. Oh...