Privacy Statement is Broken

[M11]

				<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Contact Us</a> -
				<a href="http://hardocp.com">Sister Site to [H]ard|OCP</a> -
				<!--
				
				<a href="archive/index.php">Archive</a> -
				[b]<!-- - <a href="">Privacy Statement</a> - -->[/b]
				<a href="#top" onclick="self.scrollTo(0, 0); return false;">Top</a>

			</strong>
		</div>
	</td>

 

[jpmkm]

It's been like that for as long as I can remember. IIRC, it only affects it only affects firefox/mozilla browsers. It doesn't show up in konqueror, at least. I assume it has to do with the nesting of the html comments.

 

[sp1nfer]

Broken in Opera aswell

 

[M11]

It's been like that for as long as I can remember. IIRC, it only affects it only affects firefox/mozilla browsers. It doesn't show up in konqueror, at least. I assume it has to do with the nesting of the html comments.

That makes no sense.


I can't even find the URL of the privacy statement by scanning the code manually (notice the href=""), which tells me it is not a browser issue, unless of course Kyle has modified vBulletin server side to return broken code for Firefox browsers as judged by useragent.

 

[jpmkm]

That makes no sense.


I can't even find the URL of the privacy statement by scanning the code manually (notice the href=""), which tells me it is not a browser issue, unless of course Kyle has modified vBulletin server side to return broken code for Firefox browsers as judged by useragent.

The borked code isn't a browser issue; that's exactly the code that the server sends out. How the browser interprets it and ultimately whether it decides to display the 'Privacy Statement' is indeed a browser issue, though. Apparently some browsers choose to display it and some don't. But they're not sending out borked code based on what browser you are using.

I assume they don't even have a privacy statement, which is why there's no url and why it is supposed to be commented out.

 

[M11]

ya, I shouldn't have made those assumptions


I assumed a privacy policy would be present, since HardOCP displays one.


</thread>