• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Privacy Statement is Broken

Status
Not open for further replies.

M11

Does Not Follow Instructions.
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
2,336
Code:
				<a href="mailto:hard.forum@hardocp.com">Contact Us</a> -
				<a href="http://hardocp.com">Sister Site to [H]ard|OCP</a> -
				<!--
				
				<a href="archive/index.php">Archive</a> -
				[b]<!-- - <a href="">Privacy Statement</a> - -->[/b]
				<a href="#top" onclick="self.scrollTo(0, 0); return false;">Top</a>

			</strong>
		</div>
	</td>
 
It's been like that for as long as I can remember. :D IIRC, it only affects it only affects firefox/mozilla browsers. It doesn't show up in konqueror, at least. I assume it has to do with the nesting of the html comments.
 
jpmkm said:
It's been like that for as long as I can remember. :D IIRC, it only affects it only affects firefox/mozilla browsers. It doesn't show up in konqueror, at least. I assume it has to do with the nesting of the html comments.
That makes no sense.


I can't even find the URL of the privacy statement by scanning the code manually (notice the href=""), which tells me it is not a browser issue, unless of course Kyle has modified vBulletin server side to return broken code for Firefox browsers as judged by useragent.
 
M11 said:
That makes no sense.


I can't even find the URL of the privacy statement by scanning the code manually (notice the href=""), which tells me it is not a browser issue, unless of course Kyle has modified vBulletin server side to return broken code for Firefox browsers as judged by useragent.
The borked code isn't a browser issue; that's exactly the code that the server sends out. How the browser interprets it and ultimately whether it decides to display the 'Privacy Statement' is indeed a browser issue, though. Apparently some browsers choose to display it and some don't. But they're not sending out borked code based on what browser you are using.

I assume they don't even have a privacy statement, which is why there's no url and why it is supposed to be commented out.
 
ya, I shouldn't have made those assumptions :p


I assumed a privacy policy would be present, since HardOCP displays one.


</thread>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top