lkiller1231
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 272
Actually. I agree with him partially. If I need to print a 4x6 picture out (not everyone in my family has digital picture frames and it's nice to just open up an album on the sofa and look through the pictures), my old SE K800's 3.2MP camera does the job as well as my Canon point and shoots (SD1200 and SD900). But of course, if I need high resolution shots, the K800 can't do it. iPhone 3GS camera sucks, my old 8MP Samsung cell phone's camera sucked, Nokia N95 5MP sucked etc. It all depends on the sensor, not the megapixels. Quality sensors > megapixels any day. The old 3.2MP camera in the old SEs were very good. It's just a cheap MP race for marketing purposes nowadays with no substance in the quality.
Pixel wise, of course 9MP and 12MP will beat the cell phone. And of course I do know that quality>pixel. But trust me, a tiny cell phone sensor cannot beat a digital camera sensor (regardless of type, even point-and-shoots), in broad daylight, the difference might not be that noticable. In darker places, the noice performance will be degraded by A LOT. Plus, the color and sharpness produced by the cell phone's pinhole lens cannot be compared against a bigger, better glass lens.
I own and shoot with a Canon 30D.