• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Physics

Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
624
Hello smart kids;) Thinking of adding a GT 430 to my system as a physics card. Right now, I have the CPU delegated to this task, I would like to see what I can do with it in Metro2033. What are your thoughts on this: Would this card be a good choice??:D
 
It should work with that game/setup. If you budget can stretch a bit more i'd go for the 450 as its more powerful, but its another $25 ($115 rather than $90) so depends on you're budget. I've seen a few physx benchmarks with 430s on metro (which uses physx lots more) and it worked well. Not having to do physx does free up extra GPU power for greater FPS. CPU physx is never really a good idea over GPU based until they sort out the implimentation.

of course the best option would be 3x 460 then you could go tri-SLI on games where there was no physx :D (but that would be $160).
 
It should work with that game/setup. If you budget can stretch a bit more i'd go for the 450 as its more powerful, but its another $25 ($115 rather than $90) so depends on you're budget. I've seen a few physx benchmarks with 430s on metro (which uses physx lots more) and it worked well. Not having to do physx does free up extra GPU power for greater FPS. CPU physx is never really a good idea over GPU based until they sort out the implimentation.

of course the best option would be 3x 460 then you could go tri-SLI on games where there was no physx :D (but that would be $160).

460 cannot be tri-sli
 
Back
Top