- Joined
- May 4, 2006
- Messages
- 13,310
I wish you could do SLI 16x/16x with intel chipsets...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish you could do SLI 16x/16x with intel chipsets...
Me too. I really don't know whether to get an eVGA 680i or an ASUS/Gigabyte P35 board...![]()
Right now, I think it's a better idea to go with a P35 simply because it's ready for newer CPU's.
This is what i was thinking, but the P35 lacks an extra x16 PCI-e slot and, i'm assuming, it doesn't allow you to set memory frequency independantly to that of the CPU's FSB. Are there any problems with it at the moment; memory incompatibility, problem with sound cards etc.? I haven't had time to do any research on this chipset because i was, originally, dead-set on getting the 680i.
How do these boards handle 4GB of RAM; either 2x 2GB or 4x 1GB? Also, is there a "best" one out of the few that've been released? I would've thought that ASUS P5K Deluxe is better than the Gigabyte DQ6, right?
Thank you for your help, by the way, i really appreciate it!
How do these boards handle 4GB of RAM; either 2x 2GB or 4x 1GB? Also, is there a "best" one out of the few that've been released? I would've thought that ASUS P5K Deluxe is better than the Gigabyte DQ6, right?
Thank you for your help, by the way, i really appreciate it!

here's how my p5k-dlx handles 4x1gb of d9gmh on stock volts apart from cpu/dimm
p35 is killer
From what I've seen the P35 has a much better memory controller.
volts are in the screenshots fellas2.1v
it's 4gb of crucial d9gmh
I have been looking for a retailer who sells these boards and although I never came up with any, I did come to learn this, they few of them cost like $250+. It is looking more like I should just stick with a P965.
Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400; or something different? It's good that you don't have to lower their frequency to 333Mhz, say, with 4x 1GB. What HSF are you using for this board? I was wondering if the Thermalright Ultra-120 would fit alright.
From what I've seen the P35 has a much better memory controller.
Me too. I really don't know whether to get an eVGA 680i or an ASUS/Gigabyte P35 board...![]()
Thank you, Dan. I am still undecided as to whether i'll ever utilise SLI in the future, but it's nice to have the option to do so. My main concern, if i were to get a motherboard based ont he 680i chipset, would be whether i'd run into incompatibility issues with the memory. Either board i get, be it the 680i or P35, i'm still likely to upgrade it in the future anyway to a feature-rich solution when i get a 45nm CPU. So, in this sense, i'll probably be better to get the 680i which has more features and due to the SLI capatibility. However, looking at it realistically, i'm not likely to have the funds or needs for SLI so i would be better getting the P35 board right off the bat. However, the main feature this board brings (compatibility with the new line of processors, not DDR3 support since i'll get a DDR2 version) won't ever be used since i'll have (probably) upgraded to a more feature-rich solution, like i mentioned above. Since i have to buy this in a week, what would you suggest?
I'm not sure that the 680i supports 45nm CPU's.
If you plan on upgrading to a 45nm processor, I'd go with the P35, as it's the only board out today that is guaranteed to work with the new CPUs.
Yeah, but what i'm saying is no matter what board i get, whether its the 680i or P35, i'm still likely to upgrade to a newer, more feature-rich motherboard when i get a 45nm CPU. Therefore, the main feature the P35 board brings, the support for 45nm CPUs, won't ever be used if i make another motherboard upgrade before then. So, in this sense, i'm better to get the 680i board until i want a 45nm CPU. However, the main thing deterring me from getting the 680i board (memory incompatibility) seems to be a non-issue with the P35 board. So basically, i'm trading in the features of the 680i board for guaranteed memory compatibility with the P35 board. I just don't know if it's a worthwhile compromise. If i were to get a P35 board now, which would be the one to get?
The 680i SLI is fine. You just have to get the right memory. I can recommend several modules that I know will work and the manufacturers usually have a list as well. Corsair's website will also tell you what memory of theirs works on each 680i board as well.
I know for a fact that my OCZ Flex XLC PC9200 modules work very well on the eVGA 680i SLI but not the ASUS Striker Extreme. Also the OCZ Flex XLC modules won't work in groups of four on the EVGA 680i. (Just as examples.)
I don't know if i want to take the risk, though. Plenty of people still have problems with memory which is meant to be compatible, especially when using 4x 1GB configurations. However, with a P35 board i'm pretty much guaranteed whatever RAM i buy will be compatible in a 4x 1GB configuration. Since i'm unlikely to ever make use of SLI, what else will i be missing out on with the 680i board? LED screen which shows errors, unlinkable memory frequency. I think i'd be safer to get a P35 board. Then, also, i don't have to upgrade the motherboard straight away if i decide to get a 45nm processor, even though i'm likely to get a new one around the same time anyway. Which, out of all the available P35 boards, is the best? Bearing in mind it has to fit a vertically-mounted Thermalright Ultra-120. I know the DQ6 can do this, but i thought the P5K Deluxe was a better board.
Thank you for your help.
The 680i has more features such as dual NICs and crap like that, but you won't be missing anything performance wise by going with a P35 based board. I have always said and I still say that if you are going to buy a motherboard and you don't need SLI, Intel chipsets are the best bet. I have only worked with one P35 board myself and that was the Gigabyte version. The ASUS has been getting great reports in all the forums so you'll have to decide that one on your own.
Hmm, it seems the Gigabyte board has trouble with RAM much like the 680i boards. I guess i'm going to get the P5K Deluxe, then. I just need confirmation a Thermalright Ultra-120 can be mounted vertically on it.
Hmm, it seems the Gigabyte board has trouble with RAM much like the 680i boards. I guess i'm going to get the P5K Deluxe, then. I just need confirmation a Thermalright Ultra-120 can be mounted vertically on it.
There's some pics of a Ultra 120 extreme mounted on this board on the xtremesystems forums.
I just built 2 systems using 2 P5K deluxe boards and 1Thermalright Ultra 120 and a Tuniq Tower 120
Both fit just fine!
Hmm, it seems the Gigabyte board has trouble with RAM much like the 680i boards. I guess i'm going to get the P5K Deluxe, then. I just need confirmation a Thermalright Ultra-120 can be mounted vertically on it.
gigabyte boards always have problems and it takes them ages to fix, memory problems on their 965 boards for instance.
not that asus are perfect but i'd take the p5k-dlx over the gigabyte in a flash, apart from a couple of niggling board layout problems the bios is spot on.