- Joined
- Apr 15, 2011
- Messages
- 356
This is my first post so I would like to say hello [H]ard OCP.
I recently shopped for some new hardware and I ended up buying the AMD 1090T @ 3.875 Ghz / 3Ghz CPU-NB w/ a FSB of 250 (thanks to a Bios upgrade limiting the CPU-NB to a multiplier of 12x), an MSI 890FX GD70 with Kingston 1600Mhz CL9 RAM @ 1333 Mhz 7-7-7-24 and a 300GB Velociraptor drive for $730 while I could have gone with the I7 2600K setup for about about $40 bucks less minus having the velociraptor hard drive, but after some research the 890FX boards are going to support AM3+, what I'm asking is, did I make the right decision?
The reason I ask this is because I know there's a stark difference between the i7-2600k and 1090T performance wise. The i7 2600K is probably the best performing CPU on the market, but.. was the decision to go with AMD with the ability to upgrade to Bulldozer at a later time worth bypassing going with Sandy Bridge? I need some opinions from those who have a Sandy Bridge based setup. Thanks in advance.
I recently shopped for some new hardware and I ended up buying the AMD 1090T @ 3.875 Ghz / 3Ghz CPU-NB w/ a FSB of 250 (thanks to a Bios upgrade limiting the CPU-NB to a multiplier of 12x), an MSI 890FX GD70 with Kingston 1600Mhz CL9 RAM @ 1333 Mhz 7-7-7-24 and a 300GB Velociraptor drive for $730 while I could have gone with the I7 2600K setup for about about $40 bucks less minus having the velociraptor hard drive, but after some research the 890FX boards are going to support AM3+, what I'm asking is, did I make the right decision?
The reason I ask this is because I know there's a stark difference between the i7-2600k and 1090T performance wise. The i7 2600K is probably the best performing CPU on the market, but.. was the decision to go with AMD with the ability to upgrade to Bulldozer at a later time worth bypassing going with Sandy Bridge? I need some opinions from those who have a Sandy Bridge based setup. Thanks in advance.