Yogi said:I see nothing wrong with that review.
Is he pushing any beliefs on anyone? No.
Is the review inconsistant with others on the site? No. Other games seem to be judges by the same criteria.
Does the site make it clear what it is they are looking at in the review? Yes. They don't try and fool you in any way. They make it obvious that it is being reviewed on conservative moral grounds first and foremost, with gameplay a distant second.
Is he trying to ban the game or anything crazy like that? No.
Do you have to read the site? No.
Should you be complaining about the review or bashing the authour? No. He has done nothing wrong and has not tricked you into viewing the article in any way. You have to know what you are about to read at a site named Christ Centered Game Reviews.
If I was a huge Elvis fan, and decided to review games based on Elvis content, I would probably give Doom 3 a 0 for having no mention of Elvis at all. It's just a different criteria for reviewing, and just because it's different than normal doesn't mean it's wrong.
Go to that site if you are interested in reading reviews that tell you how appropriate games are for people that like to avoid questionable content. Go to gamespot, gamespy, or IGN to find reviews based on graphics and gameplay without much mention of content.
Either way stop acting like children and respect other people's rights to judge games on different criteria then your own.
Look at their review of "Hitman" and tell me it's consistant with the other reviews. It's a game about killing people for a living, and they gave it a higher score than Doom 3. So basically they are saying it's better to kill innocent humans than it is to kill demons and evil things. Let's not forget, Doom 3 is about hell and demons, but it's about KILLING demons, NOT BEING a demon and doing evil deeds. Hitman is a game about doing evil deeds, yet they gave it a better score. How is that for moral logic??