Official 3dmark06 scores here (please read first post before posting)

mark.jpg

quite pathetic..

P4 2.8b
ASUS P4S533
2GB PC3200
x1950pro @ agp 4x <<< severely bottlenecked by cpu/mobo =\
 
Something wrong with GPU-z?

My texture/pixel fillrate is like quadruple from the GT.

gpuz.jpg
 
The new 169.09 drivers seem to really improve 3dmark06 scores. Basically same clock as my previous post but I get around 600 more points.

(688/1172)
3dmkw2.jpg
 
dhahlen said:
Something wrong with GPU-z?

My texture/pixel fillrate is like quadruple from the GT.
Click to expand...

yup, the GTs texture fillrate should be about 35GT/s, it's still not fixed in 0.1.1 :(

The GT is actually much faster than an Ultra when it comes to multi-texturing speed,

G80 does 4 texture addresses / clock G92 does 8.
 
3DMark Score 11348 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 5263 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 5079 Marks
CPU Score 2682 Marks

E6600 @ 3.0Ghz
With ONE stock 8800GT. Hopefully I will get the second 8800GT soon.
 
Easy, Xeon memory requirements and the clock rates of the 8800 GTX card. In DX9 apps, the 8800 GT can beat the 8800 GTX on clocks alone. In DX10, however, the GT does not fair as well. Best I have done with my 8800 GTX is about the same 15K result. The 8800 GT will do 16K with the right CPU.
 
HeavyH20 said:
Easy, Xeon memory requirements and the clock rates of the 8800 GTX card. In DX9 apps, the 8800 GT can beat the 8800 GTX on clocks alone. In DX10, however, the GT does not fair as well. Best I have done with my 8800 GTX is about the same 15K result. The 8800 GT will do 16K with the right CPU.
Click to expand...

OK, I see. So I can gain a fair bit by using a lower mem divider and increasing my FSB?
 
Well, a little more, but in 3Dmark06, the 8800 GT fairs better. That's why they having been selling so well. But, it takes a product refresh to bring down a year old card. Not so bad.
 
long time no post here.. just got my new cpu and was messing with benches this weekend.. still haven't pushed it too hard, but at 3.6ghz I topped my old score by more than 1k.

3DMark Score 16351 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 7633 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 8277 Marks
CPU Score 3257 Marks

my SM scores went up a lot! about 700pts each with 200 more mhz on the cpu.. anyways, more cpu hourse power did help my video sub system for sure.. these 8800 series cards need some pretty serious backend system horse power to unleash their full potential.. esp in sli.

anyways, hoping to hit 3.8(+)ghz with this chip.. I'm wondering how much more I can add to those smart shader scores with just more cpu horse power.. hrm..
 
JESUS CHRIST!

4Ghz on a Q6600?!??! 800Mhz for the core on an 8800GT!!?!?!? ON AIR?!?!?!?!?!

ZOMG

afraid7.gif
 
This is kind of interesting as this set of results is at 4 different speeds two that EVGA sells.

The one above the lowest # is my other system the HTPC.






3dmark06mi1.jpg


Current settings: 648/2052


3dmark06avb5.jpg
 
HD38703DMARK06.jpg



3DMark Score 18247 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 7276 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 8597 Marks
CPU Score 5016 Marks

Q6600 @ 3500
Dual HD3870's @ 850/2500
Vista 32bit
7.11 drivers (stock)
 
This is what I get for upgrading to a C2D without upgrading my graphics card (I passed up an 8800GT because I don't play enough games to justify spending anywhere near $250 on a graphics card):

4063

Still, it's an improvement over the 3800-ish at stock GPU and graphics memory clocks that I typically achieve with my old x2 3800+ CPU.
 
I'm getting around 11,189 with this system:

Shuttle XPC w/ P35 mobo
Stock E6750
2GB RAM
XFX 8800GT 512MB XXX (670/1650)

Ocing the CPU to 3Gs increased the score to a little over 12k.

Are these scores normal? You guys with 8800GTs who are getting 15k+, is that mostly due to vidcard OC?

Thanks!
 
Those are perfectly normal. That's about what I get. My highest is 13.2k under Vista 64 with fairly unstable overclocks.

The people with 15k are either using super overclocked quad cores or SLI.

Better way to look at it is the individual scores. An 8800GT should score 5-6k on the graphics tests. A dual core CPU should score 2-3k and a quad scores 4-6k.

Just reran it and my specs in sig scored exactly 13k.
 
rhagz said:
Those are perfectly normal. That's about what I get. My highest is 13.2k under Vista 64 with fairly unstable overclocks.

The people with 15k are either using super overclocked quad cores or SLI.

Better way to look at it is the individual scores. An 8800GT should score 5-6k on the graphics tests. A dual core CPU should score 2-3k and a quad scores 4-6k.

Just reran it and my specs in sig scored exactly 13k.
Click to expand...

I see, thanks, thats what I thought. I will see what I can do after some tuning.
BTW, how do you control the fan on your 8800GT? Mine seems to always run at very low speed.

thanks again
 
Rivatuner custom fan profile. 40% at idle, 60% over 70 and 85% over 80.. which I rarely ever hit. Usually loads in the mid-upper 70s.
 
With a 3.0 Ghz quad and the 8800 GT at 700/1000, I get about 13.2K with Vista 64 so those scores are spot on.
 
3DMark---------10678
SM 2.0----------4575
SM 3.0----------5322
CPU-------------2405
Sapphire HD 3870 512Mb @ core=850Mhz, mem=2600Mhz
Vista x64 , cat 7.11
 
3DMark Score 12925 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 6166 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 5852 Marks
CPU Score 2886 Marks

EVGA 8800GT SSC 512mb - 720/1800/1000 - 169.09 drivers

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=12544619

Hope I submitted this 3dmark score right, never really saved my results.

Not really pushing my system at all, E6750 only at 3.2GHz, ram at rated settings and videocard only pushed 20 points core/shader linked.
 
no ss but 14.9K in XP on the sig system. Everytime there was a driver update, it sent my score up a lil more...

...I used to get high 12s.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top