• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

nVidia Tforce-Looks promising

Im glad theyre bringing back soundstorm, that was the best onboard sound ive ever had.
 
How about a summary of the currently known or rumored mATX boards (s939 unless noted):

Albatron KM51PV - 6150/430 **(*optional)
Asrock K8NF4G-SATA2 - 6100/410* (s754) (manual)
Asrock 939NF4G-SATA2 - 6100/410*
Asus A8N-VM - 6100/410**
Asus A8N-VM CSM - 6150/430 *****(* optional) (manual)
Biostar GeForce 6100-M9 - 6100/410* (review)
Biostar GeForce 6100-M7 - 6100/410* (s754)
Foxconn 6150K8MA-8EKRS - 6150/430*** (also 8KRS model w/o 1394) (benchmarks, review, review)
Foxconn 6100K8MA-RS - 6100/410
Foxconn 6100K8MB-RS - 6100/410 (s754)
Gigabyte GA-K8N51PVMT-9 - 6150/430 *****
Gigabyte GA-K8N51GMF-9 - 6100/430**** (manual)
Gigabyte GA-K8N51GMF - 6100/410** (s754)
MSI K8NGM2-ILD (aka K8NPVM2) - 6150/430****(*optional)
MSI K8NGM2-IL - 6100/430*
MSI K8NGM-V - 6100/410* (s754)
MSI MS-7180 - 6100/430** (microBTX)

* = PCIe x1
* = GbLAN
* = 1394
* = TV-out
* = DVI
* = HD Audio
Note: All 430 boards are likely to have GbLAN and 1394 but I've only added confirmed features.
 
Dillusion said:
Trying to steal my little asterick system there buddy?

Definitely :p Though I concentrate on hardware features rather than overclocking stuff, as I'm mainly interested in the TForce for a HTPC upgrade.
 
Also add this board to the list

Albatron KM51PV
%7b7E1FFA2D-65D5-407E-B2BF-1C5D03497FF7%


More indo
 
I might have to get me a new SFF with all these fancy features coming out. The packard doesnt have any special features, well it does have half-decent onboard audio and video and modem, but that was only cool 10 years ago.

Dammit, And I remember when we bought the 386 packard brand new with the 1x cdrom and the 5mb of ram... Didnt seem like too long ago. This one is even newer, socket 7...
 
: warms up the credit card : but I'll hold off, gotta have 4 SATA..............plus I want to see some reviews.
 
PaHick said:
Someone jump on that and let us know....got kids and im still broke from back to school clothes :(

Awesome! I just might, I am sooo sick of this P.O.S ECS RS480 and I am staying far away from any ATI chipset right now... I might just have to order this.
 
dderidex said:
Realtek AC'97 Audio!?!?

Realtek (not integrated) NIC!?!?

Good grief, no thanks!

afaik, soundstorm used ac97 with a hardware dolby digital decoder :p
 
sabrewolf732 said:
afaik, soundstorm used ac97 with a hardware dolby digital decoder :p
encoder.

soundstorm was a hardware based sound solution, ac97 codec is software.
 
sabrewolf732 said:
if you use the analog outputs it's ac97 :p
but its still decoded by hardware - not software. like any other sound device, its ac97 compliant - that doenst meant it relies on software to do encoding for it.
 
lithium726 said:
encoder.

soundstorm was a hardware based sound solution, ac97 codec is software.

Fair enough, I suppose, but I've looked all OVER the place and can find NO reference to DDL on the new chipsets.

As far as I can tell, there is nothing particular about the audio at all - IE., no audio capability in the chipset like the nForce2 had.

Instead, it's up to the mobo makers to pair the audio-less "tForce" north- and south- bridges up with vanilla AC'97 audio, or an 'Azalia' high-definition-audio solution.
 
lithium726 said:
but its still decoded by hardware - not software. like any other sound device, its ac97 compliant - that doenst meant it relies on software to do encoding for it.
nor did soundstorm-1 utilize ac97 for DD output.

DD was outputted via digital ports, bypassing ac97 altogether.
 
Skin said:
Im glad theyre bringing back soundstorm, that was the best onboard sound ive ever had.

nice wish, but did you catch the date of that article? December 8, 2004 :( nVidia cancelled soundstorm 2 many moons ago. we had a nice long thread about it (glances at the search function somewhat forlorn)
 
dderidex said:
Fair enough, I suppose, but I've looked all OVER the place and can find NO reference to DDL on the new chipsets.

As far as I can tell, there is nothing particular about the audio at all - IE., no audio capability in the chipset like the nForce2 had.

Instead, it's up to the mobo makers to pair the audio-less "tForce" north- and south- bridges up with vanilla AC'97 audio, or an 'Azalia' high-definition-audio solution.
i never said the new sets had DDL?

(someone else said something about SS using ac'97, when every sound device is ac'97 compliant.)
 
Added MSI boards to the list...
..Found specs on the Asus A8N-VM CSM, looks pretty schweet..
 
r00k said:
nice wish, but did you catch the date of that article? December 8, 2004 :( nVidia cancelled soundstorm 2 many moons ago. we had a nice long thread about it (glances at the search function somewhat forlorn)

Yep, SS2 is dead.
 
Finally some good mATX mobos by the big manufacturers. Cant wait until the Asus and MSI offerings are out. :p
 
Is the Asrock K9NF4G-SATA2 socket M2? This thought is based off the naming convention.

Nice to see the nVidia beating the ATI in video performance, I'd like to see a 6150 put against the Jetway pro to see if how much of a difference the onboard memory makes.
 
ND40oz said:
Is the Asrock K9NF4G-SATA2 socket M2? This thought is based off the naming convention.
no.

if youre talking about K9, K9 is generally reguarded to be the X2, but AMD has dropped the "Kx" naming convention
 
ND40oz said:
Is the Asrock K9NF4G-SATA2 socket M2? This thought is based off the naming convention.

Socket 939 if anything. I've only seen this board mentioned in a single place, so take it as a very vague rumor for now.
 
Anybody know how these boards will perform compared to nforce 4? I'm not interested in using the onboard graphics, but I am interested in the overall system performance.
 
Considering the T-Force is an nVidia chipset, i would imagine it should work very similarly. Only time and benchmarks......

The question i have is, is there any chance we'll be seeing AGP support on a TForce board? I fear i already know the answer to this, but i have to put it out there. (yeah i know , its nvidia we're talking bout here)
 
r00k said:
The question i have is, is there any chance we'll be seeing AGP support on a TForce board? I fear i already know the answer to this, but i have to put it out there. (yeah i know , its nvidia we're talking bout here)
no.
 
r00k said:
Considering the T-Force is an nVidia chipset, i would imagine it should work very similarly. Only time and benchmarks......

The question i have is, is there any chance we'll be seeing AGP support on a TForce board? I fear i already know the answer to this, but i have to put it out there. (yeah i know , its nvidia we're talking bout here)

no

AGP = Dead
 
r00k said:
The question i have is, is there any chance we'll be seeing AGP support on a TForce board? I fear i already know the answer to this, but i have to put it out there. (yeah i know , its nvidia we're talking bout here)

no

Note from FLECOM: no name calling please, its not nessicary and against the rules, thanks
 
no need to be offensive about it, a simple no would b good enough. plus someone already said it before you.
 
Back
Top