• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Nvidia GeForce 320.49 WHQL

Hopefully my stock boost clocks will be raised from 1136mhz to higher+ on that drivers.:) After uninstalling 320.08.
 
Quite the flood of drivers lately. While a little quirky to install on day 1, the Windows 8.1 drivers have been kind to me.
 
I am just uninstall 320.08 and install 320.49 WHQL. No differences for me. Temps the same. FPS the same.
 
These drivers are perfect for me, every game tested runs great. Also, the prior 329.18 release had some issues with custom color settings being lost on reboot, that seems to be fixed in this WHQL.
 
No issues for me either. BF3 runs smooth as ever. I see no difference in performance however. Always good to stay up to date on these drivers.
 
What's the deal with those and 325.71 WHQL drivers released in same time ?
 
This driver may claim to have resolved surround on Haswell, but it's still pretty busted. Don't run it with surround enabled if you're planning to let you're machine sleep/standby at any point... or let it standby the monitors.
 
litwicki23 said:
Hopefully my stock boost clocks will be raised from 1136mhz to higher+ on that drivers.:) After uninstalling 320.08.
Click to expand...

Easy. I have a regular EVGA GTX680 with a Zotac AMP! Edition bios. Works fine as my "stock" clock. :p

3uh.png
 
WHQL 320.49 shows up on nvidia's driver search for all cards (incl. 760) except 770, for which it still shows as beta with 320.18 being the WHQL version. Just got my 770 today, should I go for the .49 or is there a good reason it's still listed as beta for my card?

Edit: The 770 is listed in the supported products for the WHQL .49, so I presume it's just a minor bug for it not coming up on search.
 
Last edited:
anyone ever have issues with geforce experience? my computer is saying it doesn't meet the minimum requirements...

i am running a zotac gtx 660 ti amp! 2gb, using both this version and the previous (320.18) on win7x64, with i5-4670k and 16gb ddr3. everything has a check mark except the graphics card, weirdly enough?!?!?
 
I reverting back to 320.08 BETA. On 320.49 now my temps in Crysis 3 increase 2C up.

2C + up on 320.49 than 320.08 drivers.

On Crysis 3 i get on the same place 80C on the 320.49 drivers
When on 320.08 get 78C.

GPU: 770 Twin Frozr all auto settings.
 
litwicki23 said:
I reverting back to 320.08 BETA. On 320.49 now my temps in Crysis 3 increase 2C up.

2C + up on 320.49 than 320.08 drivers.

On Crysis 3 i get on the same place 80C on the 320.49 drivers
When on 320.08 get 78C.

GPU: 770 Twin Frozr all auto settings.
Click to expand...

That's not a bug. That's how the 700 series' boost works. All the drivers did was set your thermal target at 80C, which is the same temperature as the Titan and the 780, IIRC.
 
Terpfen said:
That's not a bug. That's how the 700 series' boost works. All the drivers did was set your thermal target at 80C, which is the same temperature as the Titan and the 780, IIRC.
Click to expand...

But if reach 80C is too high even if this is a target yes?
 
LOL even my boost go down in Metro Last Light on 79-80C to 1123 and then 1110 .
Strange because, on 320.08 dont do that.


But there was cinematic along that playthrough, and windows minimalize ( activation message ) . Maybe boost was to high and not demand ?
 
litwicki23 said:
But if reach 80C is too high even if this is a target yes?
Click to expand...

No, 80C is not too high. The card will throttle back if you can't maintain 80C constantly. The fact that you're maintaining 80C means that you have sufficient cooling to do so.
 
I am just thinking why one time my boost go to 1123 and 1110 and then again up.

I was not in room at that time. When i back i see windows minimalized with WINDOWS ACTIVATION msg. Maybe this is the reason? Or something with GPU cause downclocked was?
 
litwicki23 said:
I am just thinking why one time my boost go to 1123 and 1110 and then again up.

I was not in room at that time. When i back i see windows minimalized with WINDOWS ACTIVATION msg. Maybe this is the reason? Or something with GPU cause downclocked was?
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's probably related to downclocking at idle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top