You said, "Don't base your buying decisions on the Inq since they were wrong about something they said in 2002." This is despite the fact that they have been right on the mark about a surprising number of things on a surprising number of subjects of late. Everyone knows that they were wrong about many things regarding the NV30, so the safe, easy thing to assume was that they would be wrong again.
Of course, anyone who's been paying attention could see that there was a certain ring of truth about the Inq's NV40 reporting this time around.
Your advice turned out to be incorrect, as I predicted. 'Pnwed,' I guess